if you have information on any other jobs I've left "forcefully" (very awkward word choice-- do you write papers this sloppily?), please post it.

I'm willing to wait forever, since you don't have this information-- it doesn't exist. I left AR after an argument with management, with which you had nothing to do. I quit EW.net years ago, and Spunspek went under. I still work for academia, despite your ridiculous, years-old threats that you are going to have me fired. get over yourself.

you have no teeth; you lost them in Yuri's garbage. I have a chip on my shoulder about you because I don't like racists, braggarts, or fools... and you're all three.

btw, nice try, dodging my question. you're trying to have it both ways, complaining to the mods that I'm still posting publicly, and then claiming my posts are invisible. I'm calling you on it-- WBS! stop avoiding the "challenge."

I don't assume you're trying to bite... you've already proven that you don't have any teeth.

I just assume that you you can explain why you, in the same thread, tell the mod to remove me (which implies my post's visibility), and then claim that my post is invisible (while answering it).

if you can't explain this, I don't blame you.

as far as I know, this forum doesn't have an ignore function, or block posts for public viewing. in any case, I haven't been notified of any such situation. so, please stop being cryptic and condescending, and explain yourself. till then, you'll proven only that you are, once again, all bark.

:)

charmed, I'm sure. since you're an internet master, maybe you could tell me how you're able to read, and respond to, my "invisible" messages.

as far as I know, this forum doesn't have an ignore function, or block posts for public viewing. in any case, I haven't been notified of any such situation. so, please stop being cryptic and condescending, and explain yourself. till then, you'll proven only that you are, once again, all bark.

you're almost right-- that comment would have been funny, if you would only have stuck to it. the way it stands, you answered me directly in your next comment, making the above post not only much less funny, but also infinitely less effective.

anyway, I guess you're the best judge of your own humor, right? I mean, no one else is laughing...

yep... just you. I'd love to give you some company, but there's just too much pathos. after all, here you are, turning the tables on yourself yet again.

once again, loony: if my "rants" were invisible, would you be responding to them? it makes no sense. insults aren't all projection, btw... this is something you have to learn, if you're going to continue riding that one. but when insults make no rational sense, it ups the likelihood that they might be jettisoned facets of your own self-loathing. feeling invisible lately?

I can't imagine why...

creepy! but keep reaching for the stars, WBS. I like a good laugh as much as the next person, and I'm eagerly awaiting the day when you're actually funny.

WB is a lying wannabe bully with no power, who gets off making empty threats and discrediting competitors (he works for Write My Custom Essay) on an anonymous message board, where he pretends to be a female. can it get any more sad?

WB: WME's incompetent, hostile, self-appointed live chat support.

you're lucky they don't know your name, WB... oh, wait, you use the same SN at My Essay. I don't know how you get away with it... if I owned that company, the last thing I would want would be some obnoxious rogue alienating my customers.

whatever their level of training, wrtngservice brings up some good points about pay-scales and assignment matching.

and pheelyks, essayscam's resident "published poet," yet again goes out of his way to be an unhelpful dick.

what's the matter, pheelyks? trouble at home? not enough exercise? what?

Pheelyks, his head buried in a dictionary, can't see the forest for the trees, as usual.

what an a-hole!

you might want to also add some reading lessons to your list.

Meo, before you go recommending Gestalt therapy, consider this: the non corporeal internet entity of this message board is actually your own "empty chair." no wonder you're such a fan.

btw, incredulous is one of those adjectives that only applies to people, not things, places, or ideas (although it may work for an object associated with a a person, such as a smile). keep it in mind for the future.

the next English lesson will cost you, though.

Meo- you're welcome for answering your question about why Kim posted here. if you actually knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't have had to ask. maybe you're scolding in this thread, maybe not... but you certainly were in the other.

your tone is what worries me-- that mix of misplaced pride and arrogance that marks another WB disciple. if I had doubts before, your last post has laid them to rest. you have joined the ranks.

Pheelyks- keep those definitions coming. not only do they make you look insecure and ignorant of the living language, but they also prove my point on a very basic level.

it's a combination. at times, the customer is also involved in the bidding process. say someone wants a 2 page paper for tomorrow-- they place an order, and the company puts out a $30 order. no one takes it, because the pay's too low. in some systems, writers can actually bid this order up, rather than down, in price.

Pheelyks-- I claim that the inferred meaning I get from scolding's usage, personally, involves the person doing the scolding having authority.

that doesn't mean that Khan can't try to do it-- just that he probably won't be successful, so he should probably stop... because the authority he's assuming is illusory.

whether the authority is illusory or not seems to be what's bothering you. think about it... and while you're doing so, watch that calling someone a dumb doesn't come back to haunt you.

as for Khan's snide comment being fault-finding, most definitely. as for it being a reprimand or reproof... you really don't think so? really? think again, and once again, watch out for boomerangs.

I'm sorry that it's been in vain. have you tried Berlitz?


what did your parents do to you? why won't you talk about it?

Pheelyks-- please show everyone how much of a semanticist you are, and explain how Meokhan's abovementioned send-up of a newbie for wordiness isn't scolding, according to your own referenced definition.

you've mixed up my personal definition with the dictionary definition, which you didn't even read. how are you going to get better at English, if you don't study your vocab?

here is another lesson that may clear up your second misunderstanding:

the present tense can often be used to suggest habitual action: "Khan tends to try and scold newbies." here, the plural is used to indicate a group involved in a general, habitual action.

the simple past refers to a specific, completed action: "Khan tried to scold a newbie the other day-- it went horribly, in part because he's not very secure in the English language." here, the singular indicates the specificity of the past action.

the next lesson costs money.

in any case, your misunderstandings and attempts at holding your own in English are boring object lessons. the really interesting question is still unanswered: what did your parents do to you when you swore as a child?

it depends on the company-- most have evolved their own back-end systems, or use the same system across multiple affiliates. a lot of companies have systems that are hierarchical and based on bidding.

I'm glad you agree with me.

btw, what part of the condition "When I hear..." is unclear for you? you're the one who asked for my personal definition. byeither definition, in that other thread, Khan scolded a newbie for being too wordy.

speaking of personal definitions, I enjoy your literal interpretation of "published" to no end.


I don't think "lost" is quite the word for it. in any case, I had a new contractor within a week or two. feed your fantasies on someone else's bad luck, you pompous lard-ass.

the customers in this industry are dumb as rocks, and a lot of the companies are run by mobbed-up scumbags (who are also dumb as rocks). a lot of their contracts are about getting the customer to think that the company doesn't have him/her by the short hairs. once the customers take the step of purchasing a "research guide," it becomes a very slippery slope for them.


it varies. you can tell which online sites are run by whom, because they tend to use the same interface. if you want a sample contract, try applying to a few places.

it's interesting that you bring up anal-retentiveness and etymology, Pheelyks, because I'd like your two cents, as one of our nation's young "published" poets, regarding MeoKhan's response to the above-indicated "pay cheap, get cheap" post (did you read it, Pheelyks)-- a response that seems to fit the exact definition of scold, not just as a noun and verb, but also in the medieval sense of "skalding" and "flyting."

speaking of etymology, when I hear the word "scold," I think of it as being something which an authority figure does to someone of lesser power-- which brings me back to my main complaint here, snootiness aside-- MeoKhan's presumption of authority on this forum, and his lack of a stable base for this presumption.

I also wonder: MeoKhan, did your parents used to scold you for swearing? or did they take things further?

Pheelyks-- yes, that's what I meant by anal-retentive. I'm glad you agree.

Meo-- once again, just so you know, kids don't usually learn to swear because their parents teach them. in most cases, parents punish their kids for swearing. kids primarily learn to swear by listening to and talking to their friends, and through watching movies and TV. I'm not sure what your projection of this problem says about your own childhood, but I'm very interested. what was your relationship with your parents like?

MeoKhan, most children learn to swear from their friends... if you had friends as a child, you'd understand.

I think it's funny that you think of the western world as a place in which most parents are actively engaged in teaching their offspring foul language. I think maybe you have some "issues" with your own parents to think about first, before you go blindly guessing about others'. how about it?

as for a reference, Pheelyks, since you're so anal-retentive about what passes for empiricism in this pit, it's still towards the top of the list-- I think the title is "you get cheap, you pay cheap."

Meokhan scolds newbies all the time... he's learning to be an unhelpful dick from the masters.

the difference is, he doesn't have anything to be a snide ass about, because he doesn't know wtf he's talking about.

Meo, do you still think you can scold and correct newbies?

if a writer is ripped off by a company or customer, this forum is a convenient place to post the essay so that it shows up in Google plagiarism searches.

do a little research.

you've made your bed. I'm done barking. see you in court.

RustyIronChains was my former SN here, and I'd like to reassure everyone reading this that WB never tracked me down or took me to court. it's just his intimidation game.

as RustyIronChains, I wasn't being paid by anyone to attack WB or WRT, the forum's resident paranoid dumb-a---s. I was attacking them for pure fun and sport. that he and WRT came to the erroneous conclusion that I was a paid agent is a tragic testament to what a bunch of bumbling, clueless, dangerous losers they are...

and, now that you've admitted having me fired on false pretenses, WB, I think this may be something for me to look into as actionable. I made a lot of money for AR, so I was always confused about why they killed the golden goose. thanks for the clarification. I'll be calling two people tomorrow: my private investigator and my lawyer. talk about libel and defamation! you and WRT are both going to be paying me for the rest of my life for what you did to my career and family. I'm not some two-bit gangster you can scare with a lot of hot air.

thanks for the story! I had to wait a while, but it was truly worth it.

I said proof, you stooge. I never said Writer Help Me was paying you to represent them here in any of those quotations. of course you work for them, doing kids' homework. I've seen the screen-shots.


you wish they paid you to represent them here... no one is that stupid.

haha-- well, at least you got to exercise your OCD.

all that work, and you only answered 1 question... and you didn't even understand it!

as for RIC, from what I can tell, you did absolutely nothing to him... except for making hilarious, grandiose, empty threats, much like the ones you're making here. but, since he had you pinned as a cyber-stalker, who knows? maybe I missed the thread where you posted screen-shots of his house.

it's your turn to quote some evidence on this one, you pathetic punching-clown... I'd love to see it, because I've never "specifically stated" any such thing.

the idea that anyone would pay you to represent them here is hilarious, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't attribute it to me anymore.


speaking of hilarious, it's a pretty gusty wind you're pissing into here... please, I'm dying to hear more about your legal plans. and while you're at it, I still haven't heard the story of RustyIronChains. remember? you told me that I should check out what happened to him when he "took his accusations too far." so, what happened?


while you're fessing up, WB, this is also a pretty good question.

not an argument-a-thon, Khan, but a warning to watch whom you emulate. there is enough alienation and aggression aimed at forum newbies already, don't you agree?

WB, you are in no position to be judging others based on the criteria of honesty and/or accurately represented qualifications.

as anyone but a pea-brained dolt should be able to see, "taking" a refund naturally points towards the company's putting it on the table.

MeoKhan is clearly a student of WB's method of posting-- petty, rude, aggressive, unnecessary, self-righteous, and obnoxious.

Braxton makes an awesome point, and makes it in a style that is entirely appropriate.

pheelyks, you snooty, annoying priss, when will you stop trying to censor grammar on internet message boards? it would be marginally less sad if you displayed proper grammar yourself. haven't you heard the one about "glass houses?"

I suppose imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

unfortunately, pheelyks, you have your head so far up your ass that you'll never see your own boring denial patterns, or the boring denial patterns you've taken as your own (WB's endless quest for the empiricism he himself cannot provide). for that, I pity you.

btw, you both have a funny way of ignoring me, which I wish you would do. instead, it looks a lot like a sideshow.

come one, come all-- see the gibbering gimps. some say they escaped from a psych ward; others say they were raised by ostriches. ask them anything!

that's easy, pheelyks-- just look at any post where someone argues with you, or you're an arrogant dick to someone and they react with understandable (logical) resentment. you'll find yourself, complaining of their lack of reason and logic.

WB-- what happened to "RustyIronChains" when he "went too far--" did you steal someone else's unfunny idea and bore him to death with it?

choose a side, please, pheelyks. either you're ignoring me and barking with your best pal WB, or you're responding to my posts (which means responding to a certain question).

check out what I've reduced WB and pheelyks to: babbling gimps. I should take this show on the road.

speaking of creepy, WB's laugh-out-louds are always good for a shudder.

I remember doing something similar to what you two are doing, btw. it's fun, right? I have a lot of good memories from second grade.

...and you still won't say it? now this is just getting awkward!

not really, WB. anyone can think of random words.

pheelyks, WB had a pretty good idea re: ignoring me. why aren't you marching in step?

I think it's great that you keep avoiding this question. it's been almost a whole page!

the question may have assumed some things, but it left the door wide open for you to slam it shut on those assumptions. WB creeps you out, right? all you have to say is "no..." but you won't say it! ...hilarious. my favorite part is how nervous WB is acting. I think he had you pegged as his bff.