My opinion on this is that Jen was thinking about 'active promotions' of the essay bank.
For example, we run email campaigns and yahoo ads for our other sites and services to drive sales and traffic, but we really do nothing to the essaybank.
Her actual comment was:
And again yes! The 'essay bank' which we don't actively promote any more
As she said - we don't actively promote it - she didn't say we don't advertise it on our sites.
In the year and a half + that I've worked here, nobody has actually touched the essay bank - it's not part of the 'company plan' at the moment, and it being left in the sidebar of EssayBay was, as I stated, simply an oversight. It didn't harm the site - it never occurred to me that it didn't need to be on there. In fact, I am sure it is on several other AA sites for the same reason.
Though, I took your comments on board - last week I was updating the menu and decided to take it off. It has no real value to our business or our customers right now.
2. Did you (and/or do you now) not agree that the "professional essay" marketing of the essay bank through your "law essays" site directly contradicts Jennifer's claim
Again, my point about this was about a simple error in communication. Yes, the essays in the essay bank are written by students, and uploaded in exchange for commission. Nope, they're not from a pool of AA papers. Did Jen set out to intentionally misrepresent our company on this instance? Nope, I told you a member of my team had made this error *in the meta data* of the site - she just didn't know about it! While I agree it puts out the wrong impression about us, it was never an intentional lie!
3. Did you (and/or do you now) not agree that Jennifer's written word (referenced above) communicates that EB is not a part of AA (regardless of what she "meant" to communicate)?
I agree that it sounds like she's trying to disown EB as a part of AA. As Jen states, she sits right near me - I work on EB stuff, she liaises with me with the new plan we're writing for the site, and it's new functionality/design. It states openly that we're apart of AA, I say I work for AA, etc etc. She'd really have no reason at all the pretend that it doesn't belong to the company. Does it sound like the contrary? Yes, I have gotta agree it does. Did I say that Jen has made multiple misrepresentations? No, it's not that black and white. I just said there were a few communication errors. I mean, the meta data is so insignificant too - it's not like we sit writing this stuff on the essaybank pages intentially trying to dupe people into thinking they'll get 'professional papers' - this is how you've made it sound!!
4. I really don't think that I need to revisit the contract issues . . . .
I'm not sure what these are, so I won't comment. Contract with using Viper, or being a writer on AA?
I said it before, but again, thanks for pulling us up on the errors that've been made. You know, it's easy to add a word into a meta description and not think about how it relates to the page, and it's really hard to pick stuff up like that if you're working in the middle of it every single day. Having a fresh, non-industry related outsider point things out gives you a bit of perspective and really makes you challenge yourselves. I for one will be a bit more careful now when describing what a page is all about; something I'll also pass to my team.
I hope this helps to communicate my views on the above effectively,
Carly