Researcher:
show me a single sensible evidence from WB?
Statement from OR
"Masterpapers = fake address, she posted the pix
Bestessays, etc = she stated that the address they used was one wich they had randomly picked up from anywhere and CNN confirmed this
Only Native English Writers, re several sites = she disputed this, provided the evidence AND we all know it is true
American, UK-based companies = everybody claims to be one or the other and she disputed their claims, posting the relevant whois info
Do you need me to go on?
Just think about it for a sec ... you are claiming that her posts make less sense than his??! As none would ever make such a claim, I have begun to suspect smthg very very interesting ...."
Actually, no, I didn't, but I can understand the assumption.
According to OR, Pix posted(I assume this also include the fake video posted by WB) are of masterpapers whereas WB claims that they are of bestessays.com.. Whose claim is right? Just fliming a random fake video does not mean it is plausible evidence..
he could have meant `running behind' on his schedule - not the client's.
Nice defence of a Pal...... But a pathetic one.... Leave it to the market to decide whose assumption is erroneous... you know market always act rationally.......
Pheelyks was stating his opinion ... OPINION.
Really? I don't think so? Two persons are supporting each other on this forum since long and even do not know the basic facts about themselves.. this is really strange..... I can sense something really really interesting here...