Well lo and behold, while the average did increase by taking out WB's IQ score, the standard deviation ended up decreasing.
Evidently, the who called me a mr-n for lack of anything brilliant to write, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND the definition of deviation. Lack of comprehension, eh? Didn't you know that it takes a 140 IQ to understand the complexities of mathematics?
And her pigheadedness is amazing, it's almost brilliant if it weren't moronic.
My guess for the posters IQ here would be:
Margie: 140
EW: 140
JULIE: 120
WritersBeware: 100
Lavinia: 84
Take a guess who got the lowest? I'm quite generous as it is.
Here's a hint, Lavinia: when you try to defend a mathematical ehrm, error, you don't use too much words. Only stupid math posers do that. The real math geniuses would understand an explanation without the verbiage. Have you seen how theorems are proven?
I know that you are pertaining to the fact that 73 jumped to 96 and the difference between the two is roughly 2 population deviations, but saying that the score "increased" in this manner is incorrect where statistical terminology is concerned.
Hahaha, you're actually bothering to explain it? You're a saint. Ops! Now, I'm going to get accused of defending you -- the proven crook. ",)
"How dare you call a crook a saint?" "You are in league. You are paid by these fraudulent writing companies." And so it goes...
Buh-bye. Don't get too pissed. I'm not really serious about EW being a saint. :D