I suggest that you post your requirements on essaychat.com where you will be able to receive replies without breaking any forum rules. It might be useful to post the question or give an indication of the subject matter.

You are going to be flooded with PMs as every writer will consider themselves as genuine.
You can also post on essaychat.com where "new" posters who aren't able to send PMs on this forum, will be able to reply.

Yes OK that includes me but I am limited to Law (the clue is in the name).
Good luck whatever you decide to do.

Extracts taken from essay chat.

1 17 Feb 2013, 06:59am
Suspended for spamming. It takes a lot to get suspended from Twitter. They should get suspended from here too. Does it say why they got suspended then? I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. I suppose they can get reinstated if they promise to stop...

2. 16 Feb 2013, 01:57pm
Critical Proof Ltd (Critical_Proof) on Twitter "Account suspended Suspended for spamming. It takes a lot to get suspended from Twitter. They should get suspended from here too.

3. 16 Feb 2013, 03:16am
Interesting
Critical Proof Ltd (Critical_Proof) on Twitter "Account suspended The profile you are trying to view has been suspended"

Make your own mind up but Karen has admitted on Essay Chat that she encouraged people to give her company a glowing report and that she was stupid. I would have thought that in the vague chance that you are a genuine inquirer you would steer well clear. if you are in fact Karen or someone involved with Critical Proof then please get a life. Oh twitter account been reinstated no doubt after promising not to spam......

Karen you are a spammer and have even confessed to it although not in name. You were banned for spamming on twitter.
You constantly self promote here and on Essay Chat.
Everyone can make one mistake and then learn from it but the point is that you have failed to take heed. You resort to personal attacks when others point out your failings and hit the nail on the head.

Your "helpful" comments to other posts are laced with self promotion.

You are a spamming addict and need help.

@noted
There is nothing to stop English companies offering Proofreading Services.
The reason overseas students like English based companies is that they normally have writers with English as their first language. Foreign based students avoid foreign based companies.

A bunch of lawmakers is actually the Parliament, You plan on breaking the law which says a lot about you. There are many reputable companies which are legitimately based in UK. UKLaw Essays, Law-essay, Oxbridge, Ivory so not sure you know what the hell you are talking about.

@noted
I think I can recognise someone with an alter ego @FreelanceWriter
Not good practice to bring politics onto the forum.

@FreelanceWriter
No need to infer anything, iI's crystal clear to those with half a brain cell. Noted offered to be your defender in another post..

You have similar style to WritersBeware. A writer who fails to publish their prices is not being transparent. A writer who trashes others, using bully boy tactics.. I'm guessing you are a Yank due to your spelling. Must be hard remembering all your log-ins and passwords. Hilarious.

@FreelanceWriter
Sorry I just couldn't resist commenting on this thread as illustrating another blatant example of your self-publicity machine. The double act is in full swing. Your posts are NOTED, now let me comment on your website.

"Generally, my prices start at $30/pg (USD) for the easiest types of projects (for me, that is) and go up from there for difficulty (again, for me) and for rush due dates"

Your grammar is atrocious (that means terrible). Let me amend it for you free of charge. [b]and increase from there according to difficulty and for work required urgently

I appreciate $30/pg is for the easiest projects but I can command £350 for 1,000 words. I wouldn't get out of bed for $30/pg although It might be the American way, cheap and cheerful. Is $30/pg for kindergarten age? So why with all of your experience assuming it's true (a big assumption) do you charge peanuts?

Nice photo of you under Professional Services....

@noted
@FreelanceWriter

Anyone or any persons who react in the way you have, show that I have touched a nerve or perhaps you have OCD. Have you heard of Shakespeare? "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is a line from his play 'Hamlet'. I'll leave you to deduce its meaning.

Also just for the record English laws have nothing to do with you so why comment? You miss the point by saying that students will get around this change in the law. It will be a criminal offence for essay writers to advertise their writing services so they are the ones who will be penalised.

@Jonasbros
A newly created profile just in the nick of time. Another log-in for @noted @FreelanceWriter to memorise.
It's just so obvious that @FreelanceWriter rather than addressing elementary grammatical errors on his website, chooses to salvage his reputation (such as it is) by having a three way conversation with himself.

Regular visitors to this site can surely see though him. He doesn't even try to be subtle about it.
I referred elsewhere to the photograph strategically placed on his website by Professional Services which is straight out of thinkstock now called iStock.
Where are his qualifications listed? Non practicing attorney or practicing idiot to use USA spelling.
So @Jonas I suggest you google Con Artist.

@FreelanceWriter
Passive aggressive is your technique. Your insatiable need to justify and forensically examine everything is worrying. You and your aliases police the forum and have a pathetic need to have the last word on nearly every post. You confuse stalking with someone who calls you out. If you were that busy you wouldn't have time to police this forum on a full time basis. Use your time wisely, read some grammar books.

@FreelanceWriter
Admin cannot prove whether you have adopted an alias. Most people know how easy it is to set up different profile names using different email addresses.

Yes I agree the use of stock photographs are common on websites but putting that image directly by your bio infers that the person is you. You could have chosen another image whereby you couldn't have been passing yourself off as that person. The OP is another 'newbie' conveniently for you.

You seem to have overlooked the grammatical errors I pointed out. Are these the type of errors a genuine non-practicing attorney would make.

@FreelanceWriter
Such a pathetic comment. Do I also need to "disclose" that the other photos on my site aren't really my actual customers sitting in front of their laptops or my actual colleagues sitting around a conference table? Answer: Of course not, that is obvious but the one beside your 'Professional Services' is designed to make people think it is you. You commented on my OP when I wrote about English law and our legislation banning essay writing companies and you launched straight in, missing the point, when it doesn't even concern you. Then you commented on Boris Johnson. Where is the relevance? Then @Jonasbros, another recent creation, comes out of the woodwork to endorse you. It's laughable if it wasn't so crass and obvious.

He inferred that she was not interested in a relationship from what she said in her letter. From what you've said, I infer that it wasn't the first time this had happened? All are legitimate phrases as is the one I have used. You are desperate now. Your website says 2009-2021 but in case you hadn't noticed it's 2022.

The day I take lessons from a Yank who uses the phrase 'and I fix grammar in the stuff' will be a long time hence (that means in the future). You're not in Home Depot fixing a drain although you might be better at that than you are at presenting yourself as a legitimate writer.

@FreelanceWriter Just because you don't like my opinion of you, it seems you have taken great trouble to falsely accuse me of being Rusty Iron Chains/Editor 75. What a copycat. You would rather dismiss me as a troll than accept I have found major flaws with the impeccable pedigree you seek to present. Then we have @Noted entering the dialogue to keep the charade going.

I'll suggest you contact Admin to see if I am RustyIrons/Editor 75 as you suggested I did. You are now falsely accusing me of being WB. A bit late in the day to come up with such ridiculous accusations. It is increasingly clear that you are the sort of person who dislikes scrutiny. I am not a Yank and pleased to be British. Any website that does not display a contact phone number should be treated as 'suspicious' or in your language 'dodgy' in the opinion of most reasonable people.

You are prone to exaggeration 'I never really graduated from law school, my website is horrible', I never said that. 'It's all the same psychopath who used to post here as Editor75, and before that, as RustyIronChains' indicates the level of your desperation to promote yourself as legitimate. You have resorted to falsely accusing me of creating false profiles because I called you out on that and exposed you for the tin pot writer you are. Decent writers do not use colloquialisms on their websites :'.and you notify me within 24 hours of receipt, the fix is free....'. Are you a plumber?

@Noted 'He is just filled with rage and jealousy for you at this point. He is just looking to start and prolong senseless arguments. Something that I choose to believe is beneath you and I'. Interestingly @Noted speaks for both of you. Anyone would think you were one and the same. Isn't it time @Jonas made a cameo appearance?

@FreelanceWriter
I didn't say it! @Noted said it in #15 and it is just the sort of mistake a Yank would make. People need to be careful when they have several aliases as they can easily make errors. You cannot even attribute a post to the correct author. I rest my case my learned non-practicing attorney.or perhaps it should be nonentity.

@orchidgoblin

Yes I hold my hands up about the Yank comment. The rest of your post is spot on. 'the hacky, repetitive, run-on-riddled drivel you're advertising here' sums up @FreelanceWriter

He's not even defending himself, perhaps he's looking for a decent 'practicing' attorney.

@noted
@FreelanceWriter
The double act whose only purpose on this site is self-promotion continues. Everyone can see it for what it is. Publicity stunt.

@noted
Wouldn't you agree that not putting a telephone number on a website offering writing services looks suspicious and dodgy?