anyone used criticalproof?

Hey

I need some help with my report, i just found this site and it seems reliable?
anyone have any experience or knowledge about them?

thanks

Hi yes I do they have fond a few essays for me now and Karen is really helpful . Especially after reading this forum past couple of days think I have been lucky to have gone to them first.

Any second review i mean you cant trust the word of one person!

Well, I sure wouldn't trust "Becky88." She has only 6 total posts, and 4 of them are blatant ads for Critical Poof.

I wouldn't trust you, either.

That's another difference between you and me. People don't have to trust me. They can simply simply review the evidence that I provide and decide for themselves. What evidence do you provide, coward?

check this and read what the admin wrote:

WB, you're still here?

WB is a dumb, vicious guard-dog of the company ######, which is on the Do Not Discuss list. ###### is owned by Student Network Resources. he was recently banned, and his presence here may be considered tenuous.

Critical Proof, of course, is a competitor of SNR... just so everyone is clear on where WB's "evidence" is coming from.

It seems like writers2beware's evidence was coming form this very forum, in which Becky88 has been using many different usernames (according to the moderators) some of which explicitly promote the company in question. Whether or not you think writers2beware is objective, the conclusion in regards to Becky88 and criticalproof are pretty clear. So is your determination to denigrate anything said by anyone you don't like.

that's not evidence. evidence is testimony from Critical Proof's writers and/or customers. spam does not equal scam.

All writers2beware said was that she wouldn't trust Becky88. The fact that Becky88, who is posing as a student, has been identified as a representative of the company in question, is pretty compelling evidence that Becky88 shouldn't be trusted. It's the same logic you use to suggest that writers2beware shouldn't be trusted because of an association with a particular company, though in your case the evidence establishing that association is lacking.

I'd like to thank "exact" for pointing out that the moderator has already proved my suspicions correct.

essayscam.org/forum/rt/essay-word-helppppp-3857/#msg61781

"Becky88" (karen_criticalproof) is a fraudulent representative of criticalproof.

criticalproof.co.uk

Has anyone used this service? Please answer soon, time is, as always an issue.

Extracts taken from essay chat.

1 17 Feb 2013, 06:59am
Suspended for spamming. It takes a lot to get suspended from Twitter. They should get suspended from here too. Does it say why they got suspended then? I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. I suppose they can get reinstated if they promise to stop...

2. 16 Feb 2013, 01:57pm
Critical Proof Ltd (Critical_Proof) on Twitter "Account suspended Suspended for spamming. It takes a lot to get suspended from Twitter. They should get suspended from here too.

3. 16 Feb 2013, 03:16am
Interesting
Critical Proof Ltd (Critical_Proof) on Twitter "Account suspended The profile you are trying to view has been suspended"

Make your own mind up but Karen has admitted on Essay Chat that she encouraged people to give her company a glowing report and that she was stupid. I would have thought that in the vague chance that you are a genuine inquirer you would steer well clear. if you are in fact Karen or someone involved with Critical Proof then please get a life. Oh twitter account been reinstated no doubt after promising not to spam......

This is Karen from Critical Proof and I would like the opportunity to reply to this answer. LawEssayUK you have completed twisted the account of my recommendations that were deleted off essayscam.

Again, I am having to go through this entire saga, but here goes. Last August, I asked some regular clients and writers if they were willing to write about their experiences with my company on here (no I didn't pay them, bribe them or anything else of the sort). They did so, genuine people who were happy to oblige, and I was kicked off here for being told I had been writing about myself. This wasn't true in the slightest but as you know positive comments about anyone are not allowed on this website.

Then a few months later I thought (yes stupidly) that as the site thinks I am writing about myself I may as well go ahead and do it, as I'm sure many other companies on here do. I made it rather too obvious and got found out. :)

As for the Twitter incident, I was suspended for aggressively following people. I was new to social networking and was unaware that following too many people was "against the rules." Our account was reinstated after a very short time and we have had no problems since.

So to say "steer well clear" because I have made a few online blunders is completely out of proportion. I run an excellent company, I am based in the UK, so are the vast majority of my writers, all writers are native English speakers, and we cover a wide range of subjects up to and including PhD level. So, if you are interested in purchasing our company's services, come and have a chat with us, and please feel free to make up your own mind.

Karen

Find yourself a genuine UK company. Check out the company's registered address, VAT number etc. If the website doesn't have these details then it is not a genuine UK website. Please be aware that a having a UK phone number does not mean that they are based in the UK as phone numbers can be forwarded. Feel free to get in touch with us at Critical Proof, otherwise I wish you best of luck. Karen

So you don't pay your writers?


Because your writers wrote what you asked them to write (ie. self-promotion).


You (wrongly) assume something and then violate the forum rules because you (wrongly) assume your assumption is correct.


Not a surprise here, either.


Asking writers to post spam and fake reviews, violating the forum rules, violating Twitter terms is just an online blunder for you? For me it looks like your online reputation will be very hard to repair, even in the long term.

PS. If you didn't know, you continue violating the forum rules by continuing posting ads.

Major

Well I beg to differ. I have a very high rate of repeat clients and have a steady stream of new clients coming onto my books. We must be doing something right, hey?

Spamming piece of s-i* . . . .

Karen, you're a bottom-feeder.

writers2beware

Resorting to lowest common denominator tactics only makes yourself look ridiculous...

Wow some real high class comments here lol.

Again, to any students reading this post, you will notice that there are not actually any bad comments about real life orders we have completed within this thread. We have an extremely high client retention rate and I think speaks for itself. Any student wishing to make such a purchase is far more interested in the quality of work produced than a business owner who made an error of judgement when getting to grips with using Twitter.

These other posters on here are all either competitors or people who just want to discredit anyone and everyone who works in this industry because they don't agree that such a service should exist.

Not quite, lady. You've already been exposed as a shameless spammer by many different people and major corporations.

Karen, once again, you're a PROVEN spammer (in this forum and elsewhere throughout the Internet). If you had anywhere near as many "repeat clients" as you falsely claim, you'd have no need to shamelessly troll message boards and repeatedly spam your URL in blatant violation of this forum's rules.

FYI, Karen, s-i* attracts flies. Don't be a s-i*.

I don't need to falsely claim anything. Without putting up my business financials and client details on here of course I can't prove it. But you know that and so that's why you come out with these allegations.

I have been neglecting the forums of late because yes I have been too busy to bother. But I have decided to rejoin the conversation on here. Furthermore I am not a "spammer" either on this site or anywhere else.

By the way you seem to be the most prolific poster on here. How's your own company doing?

Lol what major corporations? Oh Twitter! Yes that one again. Yes I hold my hands up I followed too many people without realising this wasn't allowed. This did not constitute spamming. This doesn't mean that the service we provide falls short of our clients expectations. And this is what counts to prospective customers.

That's funny, because you sure do.


You don't need to do that because I already KNOW that you are a liar. Either that, or you're delusional about what constitutes "success."


You've been neglecting RULES of late (and ever since you arrived.)


You've decided to return strictly to w*0re your URL at every opportunity.


Multiple users in this forum have called you out for your blatant spamming. TWITTER banned you for spamming their "following" system. The more you deny, the more I will expose you as a liar.


Sorry, but I will not allow you to pass the buck. Nice try, but no cigar. As I have stated countless times over the years, I do not operate a company and I do not write papers for students. Buy a clue.


Yes, it absolutely DOES constitute spamming under Twitter's terms of service, which is precisicley why Twitter banned you. What you did is what all bottom-feeding spammers do on Twitter in an attempt to gain instant followers in return. FAIL.

I haven't lied at all I have been open about my mistakes on here.

Why are you here anyway? What is your goal exactly? If you're not from a competitor it strikes me you are quite a sad person with nothing better to do than to use expletives against decent hardworking people.

I do not operate a scam company, I have a legitimate UK company properly registered in every way. I don't see streams of dissatisfied customers complaining about us on here do you? No. That is because we provide an excellent service and on the few occasions where the work wasn't to standard have provided full refunds to clients.

Anyway that's all unlike you I do actually have a business to run.

I've been here for over 6 years. You've been here for 10 minutes. You want answers that I've already given about 100 times? Learn how to use a simple search box.


I'm quite happy, actually. People tend to be quite happy when they are incredibly successful in both their personal and professional lives.


You have been neither "decent" nor "hardworking." You've done nothing but break rules and take shortcuts, even AFTER being warned by multiple members of this forum.


That's because you don't have "streams" of customers at all (unless, of course, you're metaphorically referring to the business equivalent of your piss stream again).


Learn how to punctuate and capitalize properly, "professional" writer.

I'm no longer breaking any rules I am merely responding to unfounded accusations on my character on this forum. You are obviously not a very happy person as if you were you wouldn't feel the need to be so malicious against me. Yes I made an error on Twitter. From this you are incorrectly portraying me as an indecent lazy person who somehow, not yet identified by you, scams her customers.

I think the way you behave and speak about me on this forum is quite frankly despicable.

Cry me a river.


You need to learn how to read and comprehend simple English. Your spamming in Twitter is absolutely NOT the only thing that you have done wrong. You know damn well that you have repeatedly broken the rules of this forum. Keep denying, and I will keep repeating.

Karen you are a spammer and have even confessed to it although not in name. You were banned for spamming on twitter.
You constantly self promote here and on Essay Chat.
Everyone can make one mistake and then learn from it but the point is that you have failed to take heed. You resort to personal attacks when others point out your failings and hit the nail on the head.

Your "helpful" comments to other posts are laced with self promotion.

You are a spamming addict and need help.

Critical Proof, now Critical Essays, is now advertising on this forum. Considering that the mods are something like 6/6 at accepting ads from blatant scams, maybe Karen will be back to spam some more, too... or, since anything is possible, she may also answer some questions, just to reinforce the perception that the law of averages isn't against her. I have some questions myself.

The deal on this company is not just about spam. If she comes back, I can't wait to ask Karen about her "editors' fees" structure, which is essentially the exact same thing academia-research.com does with "writer penalties:" whittle down a payment that is average for the industry to virtually nothing, and pocket the rest. Way to go again, mods.

Nice gem from a psychotic mongrel to a criminal.

She was right. You're just here trolling her for the umpteenth time under your personal vendetta, and she's right a lot more often than you are. What's your biggest contribution, advice to "write your own papers?" I don't know if WB's right about you, too, but her batting average is a hell of a lot better than yours.

Thanks for keeping whatever place you're so ashamed of's anti-US propaganda down, though. I appreciate it.

Do you have anything to add about Critical Proof?

Hi everybody, good to be back. Firstly, thank you so much for bringing up the subject of my company, Critical Essays Ltd, again on this website, it always brings in so many orders when you do, so a big thank you for that.

Ah so editor75, you seem to think you know so much about my editor's fees when in fact you don't even work for me. For the record, for the past 18 months I haven't had to deduct any monies from editors fees at all because at that point, with the opening of a new company, I completely changed the way I ran my business. One of those changes was to only work with a select group of writers and editors, i.e. the most highly-qualified and reliable ones. I have a great relationship with these freelancers and we also have a very robust Quality Control procedure. In fact, in the last 18 months I have only had to give one refund, which is pretty incredible. And that was because a repeat client needed the services of a particular writer due to her specialist subject area. As she had decided to stop freelance writing and concentrate on her career in the traditional workplace we were unable to fulfil his order. No we didn't just lie to him and get someone unqualified in his field to carry out the work, we were honest about the situation and gave him a full refund.

To us, quality is everything. If I didn't pay my editors properly, as you accuse me of here, then I would hardly be able to maintain such high standards, would I?

Furthermore, just for the record, we do not "scam" clients. That would infer that we take clients' money and run, either quite literally or by providing inferior work. We do neither of these things and if we did there would be hoards of angry students complaining about us on this website. As you can see there are none, unlike the myriad of other true scam companies spoken of on this forum.

If any student wishes to discuss my company and the way I run things I am more than happy to speak with them directly. My contact details are detailed clearly on my website.

I hope you all have a great week.

Karen

So you still have "editors:" good for you. Let me know if any positions open up, since the way I remember it, your "editors" make much more than your writers.

The sad truth about this mad cow is that editing positions never open up, because the "editors" are actually just hungry ghosts in her empty pockets.

Prospective writers: don't make the same mistake I did; don't believe a word she says.

I don't understand why you would keep a team of editors. Just wondering if your writers lack necessary language skills, do they? In that case, yours are most probably with underdeveloped skills because to date I think all of the senior writers here and elsewhere I know do the editing themselves whether freelance or tied to a company.

If a company truly employes skilled, native English-speaking writers, the company has no need for follow-up editors. That is a cold, hard fact.

Well, that's not true, now is it? So much for your cold, hard facts. Everything ever written needs to be edited. Whether the piece is edited is entirely another question.

Yes, it is. Either one is a qualified writer who can catch his/her own typos/errors or one isn't. There is no middle ground.

Just by saying the opposite doesn't make it true. And its awfully arrogant. But I guess it may be true if you're writing low-level papers for students who shouldn't be in college. So I guess it is easy to be arrogant about that.

Even so, I'll wager that there isn't single writer in the universe that can catch all of there own mistakes on something above 1000 words.

You're missing the point. There are no editors.

Does this mean that you don't exist? Please say yes.

I worked for this company. Get out of the thread, troll.