theguardian

This is the link from the Guardian, which explains why you should write your essay by yourself.

For those potential customers who may be hesitant about whether to place an order with essay-writing companies or any individual writers, please think carefully before making any decisions. (Of course, if you'd like to take the risk, it's totally up to you).

This link is absolutely reliable. This is meant to protect potential customers. Of course, I do think there's a slim chance of getting decent writers. If you do find one, please buy Lotto! You're incredibly lucky !

There's a thread about law teacher written by me. Please read it as soon as possible before it's removed. That thread has been closed.

This site is very likely to be crooked. If they had done nothing wrong, who are they so scared of being discussed? After all, I'm not slandering them. I've provided reliable sources to support my idea. For those people who try to argue that the passage by the Guardian is unreliable , they are very likely to be writers who are fraudsters !

It's simple logic. Whose opinion do you tend to trust? The Guardian's or the opinion from someone whom you don't know in the forum?

Of course, I do not agree to the idea of submitting the work without any amendment. You won't learn anything. However, I'm shocked at the quality of essay in which lawteacher or perhaps other companies provide. For example, in order to help you write a 2.1 essay, a decent reference guide should at least consist of

1. cases correctly used
2. all the necessary cases required for essay used
3. all the necessary legislation used
4. include relevant journal articles as opposed to giving you some references which are irrelevant to the sentence being quoted
5. give suggestions as to how to critically analyse the issue (which is the key to a 2.1)

As the essay they provide does not even qualify to be a normal reference guide, their way of doing business is so nasty.
You can have done it yourself.

Even though I know it's old-fashioned to talk about conscience nowadays, I didn't expect the quality is so crappy. It's even worse than the Q&A reference guide from the bookstore. At least correct cases have been used in those Q&A reference books. However, I don't recommend those Q &A books cos they're too descriptive, which makes me place an order with essay-writing company and pay for a FXXking expensive lesson.

Actually, it is not difficult to understand the situation. If writers provide a genuine 2.1 or even a first-class essay, they need to spend so much time on research and amending the draft for a number of times before giving the paper to customers. This can imply they cannot take up multiple jobs at the same time. If they want to make more money, they will focus on the quantity instead of quality. After all, what the market aims at is first-time customers. This kind of strategy fits perfectly for essay-writing companies and writers.

I made orders with lawteacher because I was so desperate to get a very good essay. It can also show the approach to write a good essay and give me some inspiration on how to answer problems in exam when I can't ask anyone to help me.

However, what I have received is some crap. I didn't read the essay word-by-word. I just skimmed the essay after receiving it cos I think it is not opposed to require much amendment. I did ask the writer to amend for a few times to include more cases and journals. Sigh. It's really my fault. The first essay I received did not have the case name italised. I should have been suspicious about it. It is not literally written by a writer holding a law degree. Even a first-year law student knows about this.

Since I was preparing for my exam, I didn't spend much time on reading the essay thoroughly. But when I found out this website, I was a bit worried. So I spent 60 quid to mark the essay to see if the essay does achieve a 2.1. I literally submitted the essay written by the writer for marking without any amendment by myself. Thanks to my marker, it was a 3rd. I think if the marker was the same as the writer, the mark provided by the marking service would be over 60 %. Then, I would be completely finished. If I submitted this piece of coursework, I would receive a fail for sure. In the marking script provided by law teacher, the "marker" said the English standard is poor, but didn't say anything about the fault or merit in addressing the law concept. It's like the essay was marked by an ordinary British to check the grammar. It has nothing to do with checking the law concept.

Fortunately, I received the result of marking quite early. That's why I had a few days left to virtually rewrite my essay after spotting a number of fatal errors. The writer did include a lot of cases and journal articles. But they are not relevant to the context of essay. Worse still, some cases have been wrongly used. I didn't spot the problem earlier because I was a little bit happy about receiving an essay which contains more than 40 footnotes, which I never do in the past.

But thanks to the marking service, I spotted the problem and rewrote the essay when it's not too late. I've submitted the essay. Hopefully, the essay will end up nicely.

This XXking page really tricks me. How can the company receive so much media coverage when they can't even produce a normal essay ?

ukessays[DND*]/press.php

The following link is from Guardian(authoritative newspaper) about why you should seriously think of writing your essay yourself.

theguardian.com/education/mortarboard/2012/feb/06/essay-writing-for-students

I hope that what I've paid is enough to buy them a coffin. I really hope my essays will be much better than before as I rewrote them again. May god bless me.

Even if they say the essay is used for reference only because you can't hand in the work as your own, it is the worst reference ever. I won't give a penny because it'll ruin your degree.

If you just skim the essay, you won't find any problem. Only if you read the essay word-by-word, you'll spot loads of problem. Wrong cases used, leading cases missing, irrelevant concept, missing legislation...

I 'll pay at least 50 quid if the above things are all included.

If the essay is treated as a collection of cases, there's no need to buy essays from these companies unless you didn't attend any lectures and seminars.

Even if you are as "clever" as this, you should be able to grasp the central idea from reading some lecture notes unless you don't bother to do so.

The essay they produce lacks critical analysis, which is the key to a 2.1.

I didn't study every day, but I only spent three hours to understand the whole picture of the essay.

This is simply the worst experience I've had ever. I really don't know what I should do to make up for the loss of money. Perhaps only a decent mark for the coursework can help.