Following are just
some of the errors in Post #148 by Oxbridge
Experiment:
'FRIEND'
That is utterly incorrect usage of apostrophes, and Oxbridge
Experiment commits the sin repeatedly. The only circumstance in which apostrophes may serve the purpose of quotation marks is when one includes a quotation within a quotation. The secondary quotation receives the apostrophes in place of quotation marks.
WRONG - END
That is utterly incorrect usage of a hyphen.
lecturers then that is your choice
The necessary comma after "lecturers" is missing. "Then" is absolutely unnecessary.
END OF!
A proper sentence may not end with a preposition.
university too - no longer
The necessary comma after "university" is missing. That is also utterly incorrect usage of a hyphen.
no longer I fear if they employ illiterates
There should be a comma after both "longer" and "fear."
choice - but
That is utterly incorrect usage of a hyphen, which Oxbridge
Experiment repeats with brazen ignorance.
punctuation - but I can.
That is utterly incorrect usage of a hyphen. "Punctuation" should be followed by a comma.
little yellow
Blatant racism aside, when using multiple adjectives, one must-if at all concerned about sound writing-separate each of those adjectives with a comma.
Punctuation is NOT fixed
Nonsense. Regardless of the venue or context, certain punctuation is absolutely mandatory. Only a mouth-breathing simpleton would claim otherwise.
. . . in the context of a cheap little message board full of retards - one can use any punctuation or lack thereof that one wishes. It is APPROPRIATE USAGE FOR THE CONTEXT.
Nothing about your poisonous grammar and punctuation is "appropriate." Truly qualified writers aren't capable of writing poorly.
There is not punctuation on English used in signage.
What language is
that, exactly?
For formal English, formal punctuation is needed - such as semi-colons (;).
There is nothing "formal" about a semi-colon. Qualified writers know exactly how and why to use a semi-colon; you couldn't possibly understand.
In a legal context, commas are never used because of the ambiguity they can cause.
That's complete rubbish. To claim that commas are "never" used in legal documents is asinine.
(You
Sorry, but capitalizing "you" is incorrect.
(You mean 'glaring' actually - mistakes are not a car horn)
Please educate yourself. My goodness-are you not aware that words often have multiple meanings? "Blaring" also means "flamboyant" or "loud" in inaudible presentation.
This however is NOT
The more proper, fluid form is "However, this is NOT . . . ."
And by the way
Regularly beginning sentences with "or," "and," or "but" is generally poor, amateur practice. Oxbridge
Experiment does so repeatedly.
what I say
One doesn't "say" anything on a message board. (Believe it or not, we can't actually
hear Oxbridge
Experiment's Neanderthal-like grunts.)
you too as well as
The comma is your friend.
stuff BOY
The comma is your friend.
f you want Asian Writer
The comma is your friend.
That however puts
The more proper, fluid form is "However, that puts . . . ."
no surprise then to find
"Then" is absolutely unnecessary.
who think their degrees
I'm fed up with Oxbridge[i]Experiment's incessant, ignorant omission of "that."
online anyway
The comma is your friend.
. As is MANY MORE PEOPLE.
That is improper sentence structure (i.e., a "sentence fragment").
WRONG WRONG WRONG
The comma is your friend.
A comma (Or COMA!!!! AS WRT SAYS! HA HA HA WRT!!!!! HA HA HA!!!!) CANNOT join separate clause except in certain cases
Please, please, PLEASE do not purport to have even the slightest knowledge of how to properly employ commas.
There are NO fixed rules for punctuation
Nonsense.
Appropriate punctuation is what is required
There is no such thing as "venue-appropriate" punctuation. There are only two types of punctuation: "correct" and "incorrect."