The Hierarchy System within Essay Writing Companies

He is the consummate troll. Combine trolling with a distinct lack of intelligence/reasoning, and you get editor75.

if I respond when provoked by your asinine behavior, it doesn't make me a troll-- it just means I've sunk to your level. I'd also like to apologize to Jess, who still hasn't gotten an answer. it must really suck to come here for information, and get crucified by a bunch of entitled-acting shatheads for not having proper grammar.

Why don't YOU answer him instead of badgering us to do it? Oh, that's right-you're a fu**ing clueless idiot.

You do a lot more of the provoking around here, and only stop responding when you're out of even your inane and illogical arguments and rationalizations.

you're the experts!

It doesn't take an expert to know that you're full of ****.

you think I'm full of ****? well, you're a random, sad weirdo on the internet, who has over 1000 posts and can't answer a simple question about your own industry without trying to make someone feel stupid.

I would assume that although companies differ, most have writers undergo a period of observation under which their skills are tested, and then give writers more autonomy if/when they prove themselves to be capable.

does it rly matter?

that's an odd question for a company owner to ask, stu.

I actually work in this industry, making my presence here a lot less random than yours. I also answer plenty of questions when not asked by stupid a-holes in stupid and a-holey ways.


All you have are assumptions, and you are completely unwilling to alter those assumptions based on information/reality. This makes you full of s-i*.


Actually, it isn't. You really have no idea how this industry operates.

Also, I've been a member on this forum for 809 days, giving me an average post-per-day count of 2.25. You've been here 112 days and have an average post-per-day count of 3.21, meaning you actually post here more often than I do even though you have no knowledge of the industry and no purpose for being here. I know you don't get along with objective reality very well, so sorry for pointing out yet another instance in which you failed miserably, but I'm sure you won't let it get you down....

Ive more than 1 firm. Whats the question and your solution to it?

with lazy overkill like this, it's probably best that you're writing copy on which you don't have to put your name. I don't see what was so offensive about Jess' question. at least you're actually typing the word now... as if you've just learned it.


did you forget already? the question was "who really cares?" the solution is to address your apathy, and start becoming more involved in the manufacture of your product.

Again, showing off your complete misunderstanding of how this industry operates. You have nothing of value to add here, and even your attempts at derision fall apart under the slightest bit of scrutiny. You really are the only person convinced that you're somehow scoring points.

If I was to start writing (get involved) then many clients would want money back coz they would have it hard to understand my complex points. And in many instances they would be perfectly right to do so. Lolz

just because you're a selfish jerk, doesn't make your opinion universal. if you can't show any dignity, try showing some restraint. you go on about logic, and then state something like this... what a fool.


I wasn't talking about writing; I was talking about screening writers.

Writers buy and sell accounts between them every day.

that's a weird excuse.

Until you can quote at least ONE person supporting you, pheelyks' opinion does stand as universal.

I really dislike the term "universal" when used in this manner. I should have clarified my original statement; I meant that Buford is the only person here on this forumthat thinks he's scoring points, and assumed this would be understood as it would be rather ridiculous for anyone that hasn't been reading the forum to form an opinion either way. My opinion does appear to be the opinion had by every forum member other than Buford, but I wouldn't call it "universal"--it's like talk about "universal" healthcare when really no one is talking about a universe-wide healthcare program, but simply a nation-wide all-inclusive healthcare program.

What goes around... :p

I was only using the term in response to the manner in which the idiot used it. I probably should have put it in quotation marks.

so your opinions don't represent the whole universe... just everyone who reads or posts here. thanks for clarifying; you wouldn't want to seem egotistical.

Neither I nor WB ever said anything about my opinions generally. We are speaking about one specific opinion: the fact that you lose every argument you enter. I have differences of opinion with many posters on this forum, and even those of them that have responded to you appear to agree with me in thinking you and the things you say are illogical and irrelevant.

do I? I've learned not to use absolutes, anyway. oh well, at least I answered Jess.

btw, this statement shows you to be the last person who should be going on about logic or relevance. did you read it after you typed it? do you write this way when you're doing people's homework for them? if so, it's probably best that you don't get to see the grades you get.

No, you didn't--you supplied a possible answer that has nothing to do with reality, because you don't know what you're talking about. This is one of the reasons you lose all of your arguments here.


Well, that doesn't make any sense. Maybe if you explained your reasoning instead of just saying things randomly you'd be doing a bit better.

I did answer Jess, and much better than you did. with all of your extensive experience doing people's homework for them, people expect more from you... and you act more and more like WB, helping no one and, generally, being a shathat.

if you can't see the illogical nature of explicitly defining an "opinion" as a "fact," you need more help than I can give you.


you may also want to think about what I mentioned re: absolutes (hint, hint). and if you call saying the same thing repeatedly to a brick wall an argument, I guess I've lost a few arguments...

....while ignoring responses that contain valid counterarguments and actual evidence? Yeah, that's called losing.

I'll take it from you; you seem like a real expert.

Nuh-uh, you are!

Is this really the only level at which you feel comfortable?

I feel comfortable on the 2 other message boards I belong to, where people like you and WB, instead of being allowed to take over and make a mess, are kicked repeatedly until they either learn to act like adults, or leave.

Here's another shining example of your ignorance. Do you really want to stand by the assertion that I have helped nobody?


The "opinion" is that you are an ignorant, worthless, know-nothing piece of s-i*. The "fact" is that not a single member of this forum agrees with any substantive positions that you have taken. Get it, dumb?

WB, those are both your opinions... although you phrase them as charmingly as ever, this does not make them facts. speaking of addressing issues, I wonder what you think about posing as an independent fraud buster in an industry in which you are employed? and speaking of stupid, it seems fairly stupid to assume that most people won't see through this huge conflict of interest, don't you think?

Following are merely a fraction of the helpful, informative threads that I have posted in this forum, doubtless having saved innumerable people from being scammed:

* aaaessays.com[DND*] = another scam from Pakistan
* Fake "reviews" site from Indian fraudsters: CustomEssayWritingServices.com
* uk-dissertation.com + A-writer.com = more garbage from Ukraine
* MOD: Please auto-detect members' country of posting origin . . .
* List of spamming, incompetent writers for customers to avoid
* "ESL Spotlight" company #3: dissertationindia.com of India
* BestEssayHelp.com, BookWormLab.com, and GlobalWriters.co.uk - Ukrainian masquerading as a Brit
* plagiarismanalyzer.org is a fake "plagiarizm detection service"
* Substantive issues in the essay industry
* NEW MEMBERS: Use the search box before asking for information about a site!
* If you SPAM or promote your site here, your lies will be exposed!
* christopherthebest = spammer from blatantly fraudulent customessayexperts.com
* AlwaysA is a spammer for paperexperts.co.uk
* EssayScamAlert.com - Melissa's domain up for auction
* EssayWriter.co.uk now claims to be located in Dubai, UAE
* Scenario: Customer seeks native Spanish-speaking writer
* Criminal record of Yuri, owner of essaywriters.net, bestessays.com, superiorpapers.com, etc.
* Huge laughs, courtesy of the ESL frauds from India at essayacademia.com[DND*][DND*][DND*]
* Beware of PlagiarismAnalyzer.org - associated with writing-services.org from Ukraine
* Pending lawsuit against Ben Roberts of 24houressay.co.uk
* "UK" essay blog gets suspended
* New network of which to beware
* Email validation as a requirement for membership
* "ESL Spotlight" company #2: uppsatser.se & essays.se of Sweden
* "ESL Spotlight" company #1: oodoc.com & writrs.com of France
* Multiple usernames
* oxbridgeessays.com investigation
* FRAUD: essaybrunch = ukessaywriting.co.uk = mastersessay.com
* The Ukrainians behind BestEssays and essaywriters.net now claim to be Canadian!
* bestessays.com and besttermpaper.com now impersonating innocent webmasters
* New sites from Pakistan (Dec. 9, 2009)
* bestessays.com, superiorpapers.com, and WritersAssembly.org busted by a SPAM victim
* Ukrainian citizen filing a lawsuit against essaywriters.net?
* Yuri ("Yura") vs. Alexey
* AcademicWritingHelp.com appears to be the epitome of fraud
* Get ready for a belly laugh . . . I present rapidwriters.net
* EssayScamAlert (owner of PriorityEssays) "borrows" content from EssayScam.org
* TermPaperStar.com = Ukrainian ripoff garbage
* 'Great' News for essaywriters.net and Academia-Research.com
* PlagiarismSearch.com + ManyEssays.com = Same Owner
* List of qualified writers who have been defrauded by essaywriters.net
* USAtermpapers.com - New Scam from Pakistan?
* American, British, and Canadian Fraud
* The REAL reasons why certain companies fine writers
* MightyStudents.com now trying to remove evidence of reselling essaywriters.net papers?
* More fraud in the making? Check out this job ad.
* essaywriters.net (Universal Research) owner now running scared and trying to hide evidence?
* bestessays.com, superiorpapers.com, essaywriters.net investigated by "Chronicle of Higher Education"
* Universal Research and/or Uniwork Inc. now legally vulnerable in US, UK, and Philippines?
* More lies from BestEssays and Universal Research?
* WARNING: If you use Viper / Raptor Plagiarism Scanner, you waive copyright to your own property!
* Proposed amendment to Terms of Use
* bestessays.com claims to hold a 300-seat, "Fire Prevention Seminar" - in a fake, VIRTUAL OFFICE!
* essaywriters.net creates fake "Writer Certification" organization to promote bestessays.com, et al?
* New crime by essaywriters.net & bestessays.com - Reselling papers despite advertising otherwise


Really? All you have to do is quote a SINGLE member to prove you correct and me incorrect. Can you handle that incredibly difficult challenge?

QUESTION: How do you know that you're an ignorant fool?

ANSWER: EW_writer, WritersBeware, stu4, pheelyks, and literally every other member who has "voiced" an opinion about your positions disagrees with you.


Again, I would love to see even the slightest bit of evidence supporting your claim. What-you don't have any? SHOCKING!

This ignorant claim is quite similar in utter lack of substance to your claim that I am a man. It is also quite similar in that, even if it were true, it would not make any of my assertions any less true and/or valid.

How does it feel to be mentally/intellectually impotent?

it's so easy to see through BS like this. you obviously think you have numbers here, that you're God's gift, and that everyone else is stupid, but really... you come off as sort of deluded.

oh, and that exhaustive list of slander against your competitors doesn't count as helping. sorry that you worked so hard on nothing.

thanks for answering my question, though, and stating another of your hilarious, corrupt, and indefensible claims in the bargain:


so, let me get this straight: someone who is a representative of a company within a given industry, can then be trusted to be a watchdog within that industry, without any risk of a conflict of interest. you're really sticking to that?

If it's "BS," why can't you answer my challenge to quote a SINGLE member voicing support for any of your substantive assertions? It's a FACT, moron. NOBODY supports you. You're such an unbelievable loser.


1. An absolute defense to libel/slander is truth. Pick any one of those threads and quote a "false" statement that I have made. Good luck with that, loser.

2. I don't have "competitors."
3. Why do I receive countless "thank you" responses via both PM and forum posts if I'm not helping people?


How many times do I have to ask you to provide evidence to support your ignorant accusation? Why are so so incapable of proving ANY of your assertions?


Please quote a post in which I claim to be a "watchdog." It's quite obvious that you have never engaged in any form of formal debate, so allow me to clue you in on a little secret: you can't assign your opponent a bogus label and then falsely attack your opponent for using that label.

One more time: please quote a post in which I "slander" (slander is verbal, you ******* idiot) any company. I have nearly 7,100 posts, which means that you have nearly 7,100 potential pieces of evidence against me. All you have to do is quote ONE false accusation that I have made against any company since April of 2007.

I can't wait.

I'll say this one more time before you change the subject again.

it's not a matter of false accusations... it's a manner of being employed by a company in the industry in which you've set yourself up as a scam-buster, and losing both your objectivity and your credibility. please don't try to worm your way out of that untenable position with insults and off-topic challenges. address it.

You accused WB of slander. By definition, this means you are accusing WB of making false accusations (if a statement is true, it cannot be slanderous). You really need to do a bit of reading before you start typing.

speaking of reading before typing, you should read whom my last post was addressing before chirping in to try and defend your boss' indefensible position. but hey, when have you ever let that stop you, you fawning little toady kiss-ass? what an excellent replacement for WRT you make!

Do we really need to go over the whole "public forum" concept again?


I'm my boss, and I wouldn't need anyone else to tell me when I should point out your idiocy, anyway.


It's not especially encouraging to see that you have to resort to this kind of base insult when you find yourself without a leg to stand on, logically speaking. I've also been here longer than WRT, am not British, and don;t own/operate any websites--things all of which WRT has acknowledged elsewhere on this forum. Again, try obtaining some actual REAL INFORMATION before making statements like these.

well, if you're going to butt in, then, you also might want to address the matter of pointing out "frauds" in an industry in which you're employed by the so-called frauds' competitors, and how this isn't a conflict of interest... if that's the party line to which you want to adhere.

or are you too busy poaching clueless customers who come here for advice?