List of qualified writers who have been defrauded by essaywriters.net

I know the case and you are right to point it out :)
However,


Yes, but AR, RWC and EW, all very very clearly act contrary to their hardly visible disclaimers. They openly acknowledge (to their writers and clients) that the purpose is submission for academic credit. Not difficult to prove that they are acting contrary to what they claim as it is very very clearly stated on their writer sites. Just take a look at the EW screen shot I put up there.

• 
  Doc2.jpg
  

Yup, like I said, all the sites that exist now are safe...

I know that too but like you responded to a previous statement I made:

The fact remains that to date, the only company that has ever been successfully compelled by court to give their clients up is an American company.

Hey WB, see this? People can engage in arguments and disagree with one another without resorting to baseless accusations and pointless bigotry.

Actually, it was found guilty of that charge. It was entered into the ruling against it and is one of the primary reasons for the $2+ million that ***** was ordered to pay SNR:

The ownership of *****'s 500+ sites was passed on to SNR. The real issue is this: ***** did not pay SNR the $2+ million. Why? Because, just like EW, AR and others, ***** was operating outside of the jurisdictions in question. Hence, customers and writers have no legal protection whatsoever. If you, as a writer, are not paid, there is absolutely nothing you can really do about it. If customers do not get their work, they can do very very little about it.

Therefore, in the absence of concerted and focused action, I will not hold my breath. We can, however, bring them down by spready consumer awareness; showing both customers and writers the truth.

I want to add something:
Ukraine is an EU Trade Priority Partner and is aiming for EU membership. That, however, will never happen unless Ukraine demonstrates compliance with EU standards (especially in areas of trade). The EU-Ukraine Cooperation Council overseas compliance. What does this mean? Ukraine will, eventually, have to crack down on its Yuriys and Alexies. Their operations are completely contrary to EU trading laws; they are utterly disrespectful of consumer protection and fair trade laws. They will, eventually, have to shape up or pay the piper. AR and EW are no longer as beyond the reach of law as they once were.

I still, however, will not hold my breath. Their writers and clients are way too passive.

• 
  Doc2.jpg
  

You are a fu**-n moron. You've obviously never stepped foot in an American courtroom, yet you purport to be an American legal expert (just like your fraudulent employer purports to be an "American writing expert"). American judges do not specifically regurgitate in an Order every, little detail encompassed by broader counts of "fraud" and "misrepresentation." The documents and exhibits (evidence) that the Judge reviewed prior to writing the Order include overwhelming evidence that Pakistani ***** was masquerading as a U.S. company through its essay sites. All acts of fraud and misrepresentation recounted in SNR's counterclaims are specifically covered under *****'s broad, enjoined acts of "fraud" and "misrepresentation" as reflected by the indisputable fact that the Judge ruled 100% in favor of SNR on SNR's counterclaims. I am 100% correct, and any person with any legal knowledge whatsoever (or common sense) will confirm.

Hey, WRT, what say you? Please educate EW_writer, as I'm getting really tired of his lying garbage.


Um, sorry, liar. Again, you're an idiot. In 1996, Boston University sued "The Paper Store" and other companies on those precise grounds! The university LOST! There's a little thing on the table called "precedent," which is why no entity has tried to sue again in 13 years! They know perfectly well that their case is already dead in the water.


Good catch, WRT. I could have sworn that I had already included that quote, but I guess I never pasted it after copying it.

------------------
ORDERED that *****, those in privy with it and those with notice of the injunction, including any Internet search engines, Web hosts and domain-name registrars that are provided with notice of the injunction, shall be and hereby are enjoined (i) from falsely advertising and misrepresenting the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographical origin of *****'s goods and services in violation of the Lanham Act or the common law.

------------------

EW_writer = proven liar, fraud-defender, and criminal


I didn't think it possible for all of the world's stupidity to exist in a single brain. I was wrong.

Since EW_writer is such a flaming idiot, he forces me to explain the obvious, mundane, and trivial. The Boston University lawsuit to which EW_writer ignorantly refers took place in 1996. The lawsuit was feasible for BU-thirteen years ago-only because the term paper sites in question had not yet adopted the "Terms and Conditions" policies that we see on legitimate sites today. Today's "terms and conditions," combined with the legal precedent of BU's existing defeat on the same grounds, make repeating the charges a fruitless venture for any plaintiff, as certainly advised by their own attorneys.

If what I type were false, any one of thousands of different universities or professors would have initiated a new lawsuit by now. In fact, to take advantage of the blood in the water, they would have immediately filed new lawsuits in order to take advantage of the defendants' weak monetary state after having paid over $200,000 to defeat the first lawsuit.


Your employer openly advertises-on bestessays.com and superiorpapers.com-blatant prejudice against "Pakistanis, Filipinos, Indians, and Nigerians."

Keep burying yourself, dirt-diver.

ORDERED that *****, those in privy with it and those with notice of the injunction, including any Internet search engines, Web hosts and domain-name registrars that are provided with notice of the injunction, shall be and hereby are enjoined (i) from falsely advertising and misrepresenting the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographical origin of *****'s goods and services in violation of the Lanham Act or the common law.

I reiterate: the ability to enforce damages through applicable jurisdiction in Ukraine means absolutely nothing. The only thing that matters is securing a search engine ban against all of the Ukrainian crooks' sites, which is precisely what SNR succeeded in doing against *****'s 555 sites (in addition to taking ownership of them). Heck, SNR even made side deals with Google's lead attorney, which is reflected in the case docket. That takes serious money and legal expertise, folks.

Bottom line: the more EW_writer forces me and others to highlight his employer's crimes and educate all potential plaintiffs on essaywriters.net's legal weaknesses, the easier and cheaper realizing the lawsuits will become.

Thank you, EW_writer.

Racial/Ethnic prejudice (and the discriminatory acts which arise from it) is not only illegal in the UK and US but there are internationally enforceable laws against this precise practice all across the world.


This is akin to capital punishment; the firing squad kind.


How about *****'s own lawyers withdrawing from the case and accusing ***** of having misled them? They lied to their own lawyers.


Yes, but as the Ukranian government is intent on complying with EU standards to maintain its economic partnership with the bloc, these companies are gradually coming within the direct reach of the law. Any and all rulings will soon be enforceable.

EW and AR writers and customers, you really should be heading the effort to expose these scammers.

I remember when essaywriters put up that abomination above, scolding its writers about using turnitin.com-- whatever happens, you can bet money they'll find a way to blame their writers for affronts for which their clients and clients' professors are responsible.

Exactly. ;)

Isn't it funny how EW_writer has suddenly disappeared from this thread, but has no problem posting trash in other threads all day long?

Wow.. you peppered the thread with posts while I slept and then claimed that I "disappeared"? Ha!


Good show, WRT. My position in the matter seems to have become indefensible with that quote. >.< One of the charges that ***** was found guilty of was purporting that their papers were written in the U.S. Serves me right for depending on WB for matter. XD However, I do wonder why you think that that particular ruling was "one of the primary reasons for the $2+ million" order.


Riiiight... ^_____^

You made numerous posts today in other threads, completely ignoring this thread, of which you had been so very fond until you got b**-h-salapped with evidence.


Hook
Line
Sinker . . . AGAIN.

I'm sorry, but I just had to take another opportunity to make a blithering, foot-swallowing fool out of EW_writer. Of course, I did already post the crucial quote that WRT repeated. In fact, my original quote is clearly visible, directly above, in Post #88:


https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/list-qualified-writers-defrauded-essaywriters-1282/2/

Laughing
My
Ass
Off

Haha! You mean the post on this same thread? Of course I read that, but like I said in another active thread:


ROFLMAO!

First of all, your witty comeback doesn't even make sense. Secondly, I posted the link to the ruling LONG ago.

Bottom line: you lost, and I flat-out tricked you into openly admitting that it was evidence that I originally posted that broke and humiliated you in defeat.


LMAO!

EW_writer, here's your consolation prize:

True.

Pity... if only you posted it on this thread relevant to the issue at hand. :D


ROFLMAO! You're really pathetic. :D Let's not forget that your first reaction to WRT's post was:


So, you wanna 'splain again how you came to trick anyone? :D

Hey, WRT, care to explain to this flaming moron the definition of "setup" (aka, "playing possum in order to coax lying opponent into lodging feet in mouth")? S?-t, I've done it to the imbecile TWICE in this thread alone! Hahahahahah.

If EW_writer's employers are equally incompetent chess players, they are in for one hell of a ride.

I would like to take credit but WB posted it long before me. I really could not understand why, after her post, the argument over geo location was still going on. So, I posted the screenshot. I honestly doubt WB missed out on that; don't believe it at all, actually.

And, what is the purpose of this particular argument? The original argument was about the illegality of falsely claiming an American corporate base. The court ruling settled that argument, full-stop.

The reason why I played possum is because the moron never, ever admits when I've beaten him. He'd rather deny that our planet is round than admit defeat to me. So, I knew that he would admit defeat to you-rather than continuing to play the village idiot as part of his hopelessly lost argument-if I just bit my tongue long enough.

If which thread? :p


and I believe the contrary, should there be a debate on this too? o.O


Oh please.. you missed out. Accept it and move on. :)

You are a thick-headed moron. See Post #88, which proves that I had already posted what WRT re-posted in Post #97, coaxing you into admitting defeat (and that you blatantly lied).

You mean this, right?


to which I responded:


and then:


Like I said before: you missed out. Accept it and move on. :)

The quote appears in the Order, from which WRT quoted. For good reason, that definitive quote is in multiple legal documents, ya ignorant schmuck.


Um, no. I played you like a finely-tuned fiddle, and you can't stand it!

LMAO!

Anyway, shut up. You've already humiliated yourself enough for one night (or lifetime). People come here to get real information and facts, not to read your fraud-defending rants and criminal propaganda.

Which is my exact point. ^__^ These two quotes below refer to identical blocks of text, blockhead. However, WRT identified the correct document.



It's so funny how even though I have already admitted defeat to WRT in the argument in question, you're still desperately trying to show everyone here that you won the argument. Even after WRT himself/herself (WRT, can you fix this for future reference please?) gave you credit for the original post, you're still not satisfied. You truly put the "P" in PATHETIC. ^_^

Moron, the quote in the Order and the quote in SNR's final counterclaim are the same. Do you know why that is? The Judge wrote the Order based directly on the text in the final counterclaim! You are so freaking clueless about the American legal system that it's not worth my time proving you to be an idiot-you take care of that all by your lonesome.

Can't you read?


There's simply no end to your desperate need for affirmation. :D

That has absolutely nothing to do with it. I will not let you get away with lying and making false claims about anything-period.

Of course it doesn't. ^_^ I'm sure everyone here sees that. ^_~

But hey, I'm in a giving mood so have a candy. :) I hope it'll make you feel better.

• 
  ^__^
  

Hey, EW_writer, guess what: nobody believes anything that you type. You're a proven liar and a gullible, incompetent, weak debater for your criminal cause.

Sez who? You? ROFLMAO! :p You're a sad, sad creature indeed. :)

Well, let's find out, shall we?

Is there anyone here who genuinely believes and supports EW_writer's fraud-defending claims in favor of EssayWriters.net? Cast your vote of support today!

Nice try, but everyone here knows that I'm just as much against ew's unfair practices as anybody else.

Let's use the original matter in question shall we?


Is there anyone here who genuinely believes and supports the quoted statement above? Cast your vote today! :D

The game is over. Shut up.

My Vote - Against the statement

Call me naive, but I always thought if a company like essaywriters was consistently accused of fraud, then its payment system (i.e. the company that processes its credit card payments, perhaps incl. its bank accounts etc.) would refuse to do business with them. If they're really Ukrainian and hard to touch legally, would it be more effective to target their (maybe American?) payment processors (did I spell that right, it looks wrong)?

it's SWREG, right?

It will all hit the fan at once-trust me. I'm sure that everything's covered.

They use two processors. SWreg and Authorize.net.
AR uses SWreg only as their Paypal was shut down about 2 years ago and their e-bank account a few months ago (current paypal payments are processed through SWreg; e-cheques are no longer a payment option). AR writers may notice (from time to time) that payments are not processed on time. This is because SWreg (a very reputable company) is forever limiting AR's account due to customer complaints. They are now trying to bypass Swreg by slowly shifting to Alertpay and e-gold.

----------------------------------
Where is your business located?

We are located in Albany, New York [proven lie] and our writers are based in the United States, Canada, U.K and Australia. All of our writers are Native English speakers [proven lie] meaning their first language is English and their experience will be evident in your term paper. We are meticulous about what our writer's produce [proven lie] because we understand that we are only as good as the last term paper we write.

SOURCE:
masterpapers.com/FAQ.php
----------------------------------

Swreg
Authorize.net
Alertpay
e-gold

If people consistently send evidence of fraud to each of these payment processors, crooks will be left with no other option but to accept snail mail payments (cash / money order / bank draft) or Western Union, both of which are extremely unattractive payment options to potential customers due to personal inconvenience and delays in service commencement.

Should we post their refund and complaints' department emails?

It's probably better to start an entirely new thread about how to rightfully cripple fraudsters through payment processor complaints. We can then post all of the juicy details in one place.

Hmm... EW-1, WB-0? ;p

It's happening all over again.>.<

Here we go again-the moron, EW_writer, claims some sort of "victory" because another fraud-supporter gives him a cookie. Pathetic, and borderline psychotic. LOL!