Masterpapers. Don't write for them, don't buy from them!! watch out!!

Don’t buy papers from Masterpapers and don’t write for them either!!!!! I was short of money and wrote three papers for these thieving, cheating monsters. Each paper they demanded more than the original brief, they refused to pay me, they delayed paying me and essentially in the end they stole my academic work. If you are considering writing for them, don’t bother, they won’t pay you for all your work. As if this isn’t bad enough the customers are abusive and insulting, not to mention demanding.

This is to be expected because the customers for services like Masterpapers are the lowest people there are, they are liars and cheaters. I was horrified to see essays on the site for psychoanalysis, nursing, social work. These are professions that society entrusts the most vulnerable people to and they have cheated their way through most of their degrees. The other problem is because Masterpapers are thieving cheats and their customers are rude thieving cheats, it would take the Virgin Mary to not feel inclined to take vengeful action. If you are thinking about buying an essay from Masterpapers think on….. It was easy for me to work out which University the student was at, which module the paper was for and who their teacher was. The only thing that held me back from reporting the cheating student was my belief in karma. Because writing for rude people and getting ripped off creates such bad feeling in writers it is easy to get to the point of copying and pasting huge chunks of text from the internet just to get the word count up, or making up references, or leaving a message to the marker in the middle of the essay….if its submitted close to deadline would the student be sure to read the whole document, I think not.

If you write don’t write for these people, they will steal your work and encourage you to behave as dishonestly as them. If you buy essays don’t buy from them or anyone else. Do your own degree or get a job in a shoe shop.

I agree, the Ukrainians behind MasterPapers.com are total scumbags, but you represent the epitome of hypocrisy. This thread should be deleted, as you accuse all legitimate research companies of illegal activity without any proof.

Definition of hypocrisy


WB how do you work this one out

1: a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not; especially : the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion

2: an act or instance of hypocrisy

Esquiva states: "Quoting: esquiva I was short of money and wrote three papers for these thieving, cheating monsters."

As you should not esquiva USED to write for the company not STILL writes for them. Esquiva would be a hypocrite if she were still writing for them (see definition above)

I would have thought you would have been jumping for joy since Esquiva is advising against people using Masterpapers.com or is the real agenda that Esquiva makes the point that not doing the work yourself is tantamount to cheating and therefore students should write their own essays not copy someone else's.

Research is defined as:

1: careful or diligent search

2: studious inquiry or examination; especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of such new or revised theories or laws

3: the collecting of information about a particular subject

How can students claim any of the above if they pay for a custom written paper from one of these paper mills such as masterpapers or ****** and then submit the essay as their own without making any alterations to the piece?

julie, your posts are so random it's silly. you post to nitpick and harass people about dumb topics on this board and you continue to not provide any evidence to back up your accusations of cheating. i could post the number of times that you've promised to provide that evidence for a laugh, maybe i will later.

the most recent academic research shows that 1-3% of all cheating students do so by buying essays and turning them in. that is far less than the number of students who cut and paste off the net, less than the number of students who cut and paste out of books, and less than the number of students who cheat off of their friends either in or out of class.

stop claiming that everyone who uses these services cheats, that's not even remotely offering an accurate description of reality. if you can't separate reality from personal advocacy, then it's good you aren't writing anymore.

julie24963 = IGNORE

I am not and have never claimed that everyone that buys essays submits them as their own. I have pointed out that there are those out there who do and there have been a few on here who have admitted to doing exactly that and then are annoyed that they have been caught and failed their course.

where do you get your figures from of 1-3%? There are no definitive figures nor can there be as it is impossible in some cases to catch those using these services. Even if there are only 3% cheating it is still diabolical especially when you consider the subject areas that these people are studying such as law, medicine etc. How would you feel being operated on by a doctor who got their degree by getting someone else to do the research for them?


Oh please don't ignore me, ha ha! I was so hoping that you would defend the comments that you made that were so obviously wrong

You are a complete imbecile. If you bothered to read the person's OTHER posts before ignorantly commenting (as usual) about MY response, you would have seen that I am correct.

From https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/masterpapers-write-buy-watch-348/ : Hypocrisy.


Hypocrisy.

From https://essayscam.org/forum/es/legit-assignment-writing-service-asap-333/#msg4777


Hypocrisy.

From https://essayscam.org/forum/gt/ensure-scammed-344/#msg4774 :


Hypocrisy.

Wow some of you guys are really twisted up!!!!! Why do you waste time arguing with people about who's definitions are correct? Why does that matter so much to you? I'm beginning to think this is a forum for the intellectually insecure to boast their wares. Back to the subject - It must be a nonsense to imagine that people who pay people to write their essays don't submit them as their own...what other possible use is there for this service, research? come on! But guys really, I'm sure you're all fantastically intelligent, go write a book, even get it published! Good for you!!!!! The thing is there's no point me coming back to this forum again because I don't care who's most clever. I am secure in my own academic and intellectual achievements. Make love not spite!!!!!! Oh p.s I think it's lovely so many people discussed hypocrisy in connection with my posting, it made no sense at all, but it was a lovely gesture. xx

esquiva is writing in the past tense stating he/she used to write for paper mills. at the time esquiva started writing he/she might not have known that they were not going to pay properly, that the essays would be submitted as the students own work. I can understand esquiva's iritation with these companies hence the reason I also quit.

When I first applied to become a writer I was told that I would only be writing model answers for Universities. It soon became blatantly obvious that this was not the case and also that the students were submitting the work as their own judging by the requests for minor alterations that a primary school should have been able to accomplish.

I found that I could not condone such blatant cheating and quit writing. I know work as an online tutor as well as part time lecturer and full time barrister.

hypocrisy would be for esquiva to continue writing and taking money from the students as that would show that despite the fact that he/she despises the students that submit the work as their own they are prepared to ignore this just to earn extra money. esquiva states that he/she wrote 3 essays only that is hardly encouraging wide scale cheating and also shows that once esquiva realised that the company was a con and the students were cheats that they decided that their conscience should win over and they should not encourage the chaeting by continuing to write for such companies.

I note that once again you have to resort to insults just because you are challenged on your understanding of the english language. I also find it amusing that you could not resist responding. Julie24963=ignore ha ha and then you go on to insult me in your next post. Hey the phrase 'kettle calling the pot black' comes to mind ha ha didn't you have a go at me when I continued to write when I said I was not going to anymore. Looks like your guilty too!!

Wow, you have quite the knack for writing FICTION, don't you, Julie24963? Esquiva NEVER made such a statement. He/she knew EXACTLY what he/she was doing from the start. He/she admits such:


Basically, esquiva is using his/her shortage of dirty money at the time to justify his/her dabbling in MasterPapers.com filth. Now YOU are posting your usual, twisted conjecture about esquiva's "innocent ignorance" as FACT, simply to avoid me proving you to be a lying, fraud-supporting, lame-brain yet again.

As for your other incredibly ignorant accusation, I NEVER stated that I would not continue writing (unlike you). Quote me, liar!

"Julie24963=ignore"

That means people should ignore your claims, as they are complete gibberish backed by ZERO facts.

Smackdown over.

dream on !! you crack me up ! what a joke you are

Get a life!

you wouldn't know a smackdown if it hit you in the face lol

Ha ha ha you two are a match made in heaven!!!!!!! It's been an education seeing what some people spend their lives arguing over. Ciao.

All gone a bit silent now hasn't it?

I have an excellent life, thank you.

Julie, are you denying that I proved you wrong? Yes or no answer, please.


Esquiva, you may not have noticed, but nobody here cares about your hypocritical *** in the least. Keep typing to yourself.

By the way, "ciao" is usually followed by more than TWO MINUTES before the next post. Pathetic.

eh? i posted 3 academic studies that offered percentages based upon empirical research weeks ago... you know, back when you first promised to send evidence to counter the point...i know you have a tendency to ignore the content of other people's posts but they're still up and shouldn't be that difficult for you to find. i think it's funny that now you claim that the evidence doesn't exist when weeks ago you promised to provide it to counter the studies i cited.


nonresponsive and nonsensical. so i should stop writing books and web content because they may be used by someone to cheat in the oh so distant future? we'd have to ban the written word to prevent all cheaters from acting and even then they would find other ways to cheat, such as by sharing notes in classes and working together on assignments meant to be conducted solo. the solution is better assignments, better detection, and harsher punishments, not demonizing this or any other industry.


you wrote three papers for a fraudulent company and assume that you know all there is to know about this industry's clientele? that is pretty foolhardy. yes, the majority of customers use the products supported by this industry for research and support purposes. tons of folks just use it for editing their pre-written work. to say that all of them cheat, and that all of us writing for them are enabling their cheating, is both insulting and factually inaccurate.

For lack of something better to do. Obviously they don't have any order fulfillments to attend to. So, rather than spinning their wheels, they fight amongst themselves. Similar to sharks in the womb. Ignore their arguements. They were just trying to hijack the thread as they normally tried to do.

I am not in agreement with labeling the students as abusive, insulting, and demanding. I believe that students only become such when they end up with a holier than their and non- cooperative winter such as yourself. Just look at the writing tone and you will know what I mean. Students tend to get mean when they are ignored by the writer. By the time the writer gets around to responding, the student's patience has wither wornthin or run out, hence the mean treatment towards the writer. Maybe the writer should ask himself if he caused the student to treat him that way? Surely there is a shared fault somewhere along the line.