I challenged you to prove that Rusty is not (as you assert) a clueless, lying propagandist by simply referencing my "global errors."
Errr... your (as you assert) is misplaced. >.< More proof of what I (not rusty) think are your "global errors." :p
I said that rusty is neither stupid nor clueless.
Wow, do I really need more proof of your
sidestepping and cluelessness? LMAO!
I never claimed that he wasn't [a liar] and I am not claiming that he is [a liar]. I have no interest in doing so and have never expressed any.
That's some good ol' snake oil salesman bulls-i* right there, folks!
"It depends on what your definition of 'is' is. I did not have sex with that woman!"
OK, so your official position is that Rusty is NOT stupid or clueless. Got it. It's complete bulls-i* and many others also know that it is bulls-i*, but let's move forward. You will not take a position on whether he is a liar because you know that you are majorly F!*KED either way. I don't give a crap if you have no "interest in doing so." That's a lame excuse. I wouldn't expect you to be "interested" in incriminating yourself, but you don't have much of a choice (unless you're OK with being known as a spineless coward). Don't worry-I will not stop demanding that you step up to the plate. You might as well just take a position now.