Legitimate Dissertations ... Poor poor customer service.

Excuses. Are you actually telling us that the companies to which you applied, including Legitimate Dissertations, still have not responded? What does that tell you? They don't want to hire your as*! In fact, they won't even humor you with a response!

Funny--you fraud supporters never accuse me of posting statements that are UNTRUE. I wonder why. Perhaps, it's because you ALL know that I will slap you in the face with a big, sloppy piece of EVIDENCE!

I have a nasty habit of pointing out LIARS and sealing the deal with VERIFIABLE PROOF.

I do this whenever the opportunity arises, in ANY thread. This is my 1,000th post (clap clap), of which only a very small percentage have had anything to do with Legitimate Dissertations. By your seriously damaged reasoning, I should just IGNORE all threads that include the word, "Legitimate Dissertations," right? Do you think that if someone is spewing accusations that I am fairly certain are false and/or misleading, I should not post because YOU or other fraud supporters may skew my responses and use them against me to further your baseless campaign against me? Sorry, that's not how I roll. I call 'em like I see 'em. Believe me, I am well aware that some of my posts give you fraud supporters the ONLY means of attack against me by claiming--without evidence of ANY kind--that I own or work for Legitimate Dissertations, but guess what--I don't care. I have the integrity to stick to my guns. If it weren't for me handing you some firepower (albeit baseless), you would have none, because you sure as HELL can't refute any of my fact-based claims with your own evidence or proof of any kind. THE ENTIRETY OF YOUR TIME IN THIS FORUM SEEMS TO REVOLVE AROUND SCRUTINIZING MY POSTS WITH A MICROSCOPE. Get a life and have the guts to actually present evidence that proves my assertions wrong. (I might as well ask you to lasso the moon, beacuse that's equally as impossible. My claims are valid and my evidence is solid. You know it, visitors know it, and your fraud-supporting cohorts sure as hell know it, which is why they spend so much time trying to discredit me with completely fabricated accusations.)

I've quickly put together a couple of posts just to show how utterly incompetent you are in your recent accusation that I have "never defended any company besides Legitimate Dissertations." First of all, I want to make clear that I do not "defend" ANY particular sites. I confront false accusations from ANYONE, on ANY topic, and in ANY thread. I am particularly sensitive to false claims made about American sites that I have used my PERSONAL TIME AND MONEY to investigate and found to employ honest and legal business practices (unlike the vast majority of their foreign counterparts, which I have PROVEN WITH EVIDENCE). If you have a problem with my irrational habit of making people PROVE their accusations, tough s-i*! Plus, I can't control if the person spouting garbage happens to have posted misleading information about Legitimate Dissertations. By your reasoning, I must also own or work for papermasters.com, thepaperexperts.com, fastpapers.com, go-essays.com, and every other AMERICAN site in the industry. (After all, I defend the American research industry all the time, so I must own or work for all of the thousands of sites that it encompasses. "I'm rich, beeeeeitch!")

---------------------------

"I've asked each of these companies if I could turn in the paper for a grade:

Legitimate Dissertations
paper masters
the paper experts
fast papers
go-essays

They all stated, 'No.'"

---------------------------

"Lavinia, your posts make WAY too much sense"

So because YOU state that YOU asked them and THEY said NO that means its TRUE lol OK Post the email they sent in response to your enquiry then we can all see what THEY said, Besides this isn't exactly what I meant by defending as well you know AND you still haven't shown any of US were you have asked another company for their side of the story- perhaps because you NEVER have before.


As pointed out by another poster quite some time ago my research is flawed by disclosing the companies I had submitted applications to. All it takes is for someone such as yourself to highlight to Legitimate Dissertations or any of the other companies that I am conducting such an experiment and they refuse to take on any new writers for the time being. It is obvious that you made Legitimate Dissertation aware of Moneeb's post from the email Moneeb received telling him/her that her essay request was not going to be carried out due to the complaint on here. It does not take an Einstein to work out that you could have told them about my research project since the first email I had asked for a sample of my work and since then I have heard nothing at all- neither a rejection or an acceptance.


I have never endorsed the fraudulent activity of any company. Feel free to scrutinise my posts as I know that I have never endorsed one company over another or tried to excuse fraudulent activity.

What a cowardly crock of s-i*.


Ask them YOURSELF, smartass. Hell, you can wait 6 months or 6 years--you'll get the same answer of "No." All you do is criticize ME, when you don't do sh@t yourself! By the way, you apparently aren't aware that, in this country, people are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. SInce it is you who is making an ACCUSATION about certain companies' fraudulent conduct, it is on YOUR shoulders to PROVE it. I don't even make an accusation unless I know that I can prove it with EVIDENCE! It is NOT my chore to prove to be innocent any person or business.


If you didn't receive a reply or a follow-up, you have been REJECTED! At what point are you going to admit your embarrassing defeat? Two years from now, when they STILL have not responded, are you going to continue claiming that you "haven't been rejected yet"? LMAO!

How convenient that you didn't address this paragraph or answer the ending question. I repeat--COWARD!

Yawn so boring. Are you being sponsored to see how many times you can say COWARD in one post lol. You must be racking up the dollars lol.

What you are failing to get here is I don't give a toss whether I am accepted or rejected. My aim was to see if they would accept an ESL writer but as I have put hardly any effort into this quest I am hardly surprised not to have had a response. If I were seriously interested in writing I would have chased up the application but to be honest short of sending the initial email and an essay written 3 years ago for my course that is the full extent of my communication with any of the companies. And as mentioned above the study itself is flawed in that (as you once pointed out yourself) these companies come on here to browse the comments ergo any company not wishing to be caught out are going to be a little cautious about employing a new writer in case they are part of the experiment.

COWARD, address this paragraph.


I am not "failing to get" a damn thing. I fully understand your little, FAILED experiment. You expressed great excitement when you started. Now, AFTER it fails, you start making excuse after excuse. You have plenty of time to post frequent, lengthy posts in this forum, but you don't have time to send a brief follow-up email to ANY of the American companies who have IGNORED your application? Please stop insulting the intelligence of the members of this forum and admit that your experiment failed. You tried to prove me wrong, and you failed. That's what happens when one challenges EVIDENCE with baseless CONJECTURE.

Hey you forgot to put COWARD in your post tut tut your slipping lol. I haven't posted ANY follow up because as I have said countless times already I haven't FOLLOWED up any of my applications. Yes initially I thought it might be amusing to prove that companies that state they won't hire ESL writers would employ them, however, I find it far more amusing to keep pulling your chain and a lot less effort. Oh how easily you rise to the bait lol. Have a coke and a smile as my uni mate would say lol.

Nice excuses. You lost.

Oh if it makes you feel better lol you can only lose if you were in a competition to win. I did not realise i was in any such competition as it was a personal challenge i set myself not a challenge set by anyone else. I NEVER made any assertions that I would DEFINITELY be able to prove anything I said that I would contact various companies to see if I could persuade them to employ an ESL writer. If I had stated that I could DEFINITELY prove this thesis and then couldn't then yes I guess you could say I lost but since I was only testing a notion then it isn't a case of winning or losing. If you had stated that I couldn't find such a company and I had stated that I DEFINITELY could and then I couldn't then yes you would have won and I would have lost, however this was not the case and I would NEVER have made such an assertion as I was testing the hypothesis which means that I had no idea what the result would be. IF I do get any jobs from my applications whenever I will be sure to tell everyone, but I am not going to lose any sleep trying to chase them.

You are such an easy target lol I guess I must be kind of perverse to get fun out of winding you up lol

Dream on . . . . You're just one more in a long line of fraud-supporting chumps who've thought they could beat me in a debate and proceeded to get OWNED.

lol if that's what floats your boat then dream on wb lol you can't even see when someone is baiting you lol

You challenged my statements. You tried to prove me wrong. You couldn't. Therefore, you lost.

Next.

To be fair, ss did not challenge statements you MADE. She challenged the fact that you DID NOT make statements regarding companies bar Legitimate Dissertations.

Why do you always try and twist what others post to suit your stubborn needs?

To be fair, SS2 (solidsnake), this is what SS1 said:


Clearly false, as demonstrated by the links. I'd remembered the papermasters thread as well as the inquiries regarding the list of companies to demonstrate that they tell students not to turn in papers. She kept pushing it after claiming to have read all of WB's posts.

SS1 was wrong and she refuses to admit it. It's pretty childish.

Lavinia

I then corrected this with what I should have put in the first place which is that WB has NEVER asked the other companies for their side of the story, a fact that CANNOT be refuted since WB has NEVER asled for the other side's story. When I mentioned jumping to the defence I meant by asking for their opinion though I admit to not expressing myself clearly. However, I still stand by the assertion that WB has NEVER stated that she intends to contact the companies that have been slated to ask for their side.


This was the first post I made on this subject which is why I thought it was obvious what I meant by defending other companies

Hello, dear! Why should I bother wasting my time asking for fraudulent companies' "side of the story" when I already know--FOR A FACT--that those companies employ fraud and deception as a cornerstone of their business models? (Should I ask for OJ's side, too?) Have you not bothered to review the MOUNTAIN of verifiable evidence against such companies that I and others have posted in this forum?

I ask, yet again, what--EXACTLY--are you claiming is false that I have typed about any of the companies that I have determined--strictly with verifiable evidence--to be fraudulent? There are three possible scenarios here:

1. you blindly support the fraudulent sites;

2. you have an irrational vendetta against the handful of companies that do not engage in fraudulent business practices, and champion the notion that such companies are "guilty until proven innocent" because of the general reputation of the industry that the fraudulent companies (that all happen to be located outside of North America) have engendered;

3. you have a personal grudge against me.

Any reasonable person will agree that all three are ridiculous.

I don't know if I understand it correctly because I'm still amazed -- but does it mean that legitimate businesses just give out the confidential information about their business practices to strangers who just happen to email them and ask about it? Let me email 10 random companies and see how much information I can gather this way :D.

No, you have it completely wrong. That is not at all what transpired, and I don't see how you could have come to that conclusion if you had actually read this thread.

That's what you said WB. So I can totally understand how stu4 arrived at the conclusion.
Surely Legitimate Dissertations will breach the US version of a Data Protection Act by disclosing any sort of info regarding moneeb's transaction with them to you (someone allegedly not affiliated with Legitimate Dissertations), no?

Or am I missing something here?

Quite simply, you're an idiot, and I will not humor you. Why you are still a member of this forum is beyond me

Moneeb was claiming (from experience) that they had had a bad experience with Legitimate Dissertations, which is only the same as other customers claiming they have been ripped off by other companies. You cannot disprove Moneeb's assertion but yet you attempted to ascertain their version, why bother? Why not let an official from Legitimate Dissertations come on here themselves to defend their reputation? If they feel they have been unjustly treated it is up to them to address this manner just as it is up to the other companies that have been slated. I am questioning YOUR motive for wanting to get their version. It is a simple question which you repeatedly keep dodging stating it is unfair to accuse without proof. This is a case of double standards when there are often accusations made on here without any evidence (except for the word of the topic starter) when no one challenges the person starting the topic. And no one has ever asked for the opinion of the company, though some company reps have come on here to defend themselves.

Dammit, read! I am NOT going to continue answering the same, pointless question over, and over, and over again! Read. Absorb. Comprehend.

"Why should I bother wasting my time asking for fraudulent companies' "side of the story" when I already know--FOR A FACT--that those companies employ fraud and deception as a cornerstone of their business models? (Should I ask for OJ's side, too?) Have you not bothered to review the MOUNTAIN of verifiable evidence against such companies that I and others have posted in this forum?"

I read the thread and my conclusion is how manipulative WB is. Why do you, WB, only "investigate" when someone says something against Legitimate Dissertations and you either ignore or follow up by posting your "proofs" if the site happens to be a direct competitor of Legitimate Dissertations OR is based in Pakistan/India OR you want to THINK they hire ESL writers?

Yes, you posted 1000 messages but they overall make little sense talk about the same old story that 99% of all companies are s-i* because most of them are based outside the US and Legitimate Dissertations and some selective others are great. It's total nonsense and it needs to be considered by the administrators of this site.

It is not YOUR job to defend Legitimate Dissertations ... or is it? Surely Legitimate Dissertations are quite capable of coming on a site like this in order to respond.... they obviously know of its existence from the email they sent to Moneeb rejecting the second order. If they feel they have been wronged it is up to them to respond not for you to poke your nose and get their response. Comments from Moneeb do not affect you personally so why would you feel the need to jump to their defense?

Stu4, you are clearly associated with a fraudulent company and I will not humor by answering inflammatory questions that I have already answered dozens of times.

Post PROOF of your statements, or shut your a**.


Already answered. Learn how to read.

No you haven't answered the question WHY DO YOU DEFEND Legitimate Dissertations WHEN THEY ARE CAPABLE OF DOING THIS THEMSELVES?


Of course anyone that does not agree with you is either an idiot, a coward or works for a fraudulent company lol least you are consistent in your accusations lol

Please read the forum rules:

5. All posters agree to be respectful to each other. EssayScam.org has the right to ban posters who do not abide legal or social norms and regulations.

Why do you post anything that you post? What a freaking' stupid question. You're grasping at straws because you are such an utter FAILURE in trying to win arguments against me.


Your entire introduction to this forum is inflammatory. I knew what you were about after ONE post. So, once again, I respectfully type, "Post PROOF of your accusations, or shut your a**."

And you accuse others of not answering questions asked of them, you are a master at avoiding answering questions with regard to the motive behind your posts.

The more you dodge the issue the more apparent it seems that you must have something to gain by defending them

I already answered the question. If you would learn how to READ, that would be apparent.

No you just keep harping on about how you don't need to ask 'fraudulent' companies their opinion cos you know they are fraudulent. You do not explain WHY you have to ask Legitimate Dissertations. Let them defend themselves if you have no involvement with them or nothing to gain from defending them.

Why do you love me so much?

Cos you have such a warm personality (tongue in cheek) lol

All that shows is that you defended paper masters once by asking them if you could submit a paper as your own wow. does not explain your continual defense of Legitimate Dissertations.

What happened to your incessant claim that I have "never" done so? YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR. (You like how I made you repeat the false accusation over and over before proving you to be a liar? LOL!)

Why don't you claim that I also own or work for paper masters, the paper experts, fast papers, go-essays, and every other AMERICAN site in the industry?

Why don't you explain why I have NEVER attacked CustomPapers (a site that has no verifiable ties to fraudulent activity)?


Please post PROOF of "continual." What evidence can you post that proves that even 5% of my posts have had ANYTHING WHATSOEVER to do with Legitimate Dissertations? If it weren't for you fraud-supporters always making false accusations, I would never even type the word, "Legitimate Dissertations"!

You know full well that I have SEVERAL times posted since, that the question was on whether you had asked other companies for their opinions.


As in every time someone slags off Legitimate Dissertations you respond. Admittedly there aren't many posts slagging off Legitimate Dissertations so you haven't had to defend them often but you invariably have to side with Legitimate Dissertations every time someone says something bad about them ... explain!

Post
the
proof!

Are you even capable?

When are you going to learn that your baseless accusations will NEVER defeat my verifiable evidence?

Proof of when I have ever defended any fraudulent company? Oh there isn't any ..why? because I have no affiliation with any company and therefore no need to defend anyone.

Answer the questions.
(I will NEVER let this go, so you might as well answer the THREE questions now.)

Nice attempt at dodging my challenge to prove I have ever defended any fraudulent companies.

Sorry, but you can't "change" the accusation AFTER I prove you to have LIED! Pathetic.


I never stated that you did support any particular, fraudulent company, lady! However, by incessantly challenging my EVIDENCE against fraudulent companies instead of admitting that my evidence is valid, you are SUPPORTING the fraud.

Learn how to read, if not for yourself, for everyone else!

"I ask, yet again, what--EXACTLY--are you claiming is false that I have typed about any of the companies that I have determined--strictly with verifiable evidence--to be fraudulent? There are three possible scenarios here:

1. you blindly support the fraudulent sites;

2. you have an irrational vendetta against the handful of companies that do not engage in fraudulent business practices, and champion the notion that such companies are "guilty until proven innocent" because of the general reputation of the industry that the fraudulent companies (that all happen to be located outside of North America) have engendered;

3. you have a personal grudge against me.

Any reasonable person will agree that all three are ridiculous."

So I am supposed to take everything you say at face value... yeah right! I have not challenged your assertions on the locations of companies.. what I have challenge is the way in which you constantly have to cite the location of these companies as though that in itself is proof that the writers who work for these companies must be ESL ans substandard writers.


the comment above insinuates that I am a fraud supporter by the very fact it was in response to one of my comments. LIAR lol

one example of your defense of Legitimate Dissertations where you did not tel the us student that recommendations were not allowed see solidsnake's comments lol

By the way I like your quote from 2007 lol


you could have fooled me lol

oh and two more topis were you defended Legitimate Dissertations.

need i continue further you wanted proof so i thought on this one occasion i would oblige lol