Blatant spamming technique by the Essay Research Team

Dear all,
I have been amazed to discover tens of thousands of spamming doorway pages of the Essay Research Team company - ET (/subjects.html), and what's even more amazing most of them rank high in Google while the homepage has PageRank 6. Of course, it is a just a matter of time before Google takes this outright violation of Google's rules into account and removes ET from its search engine results.

However, being good citizens that we are we have to make this fraudulent behavior end quicker!
All of those who care, please, report the essay research team here google.com/contact/spamreport.html

WB, being an avid truth-seeker that you are I personally expect you to take an active part in stopping this straightforward and genuine SEO fraud.

I will be further spreading this information on other forums among those who care, so really, there would be little point in removing this thread.

Thank you for your attention!

It is a myth

So, I did some brief checking on investigator's claims, and here are my (admittedly limited) results:

Google searches of "admiralty law" and "abstinence based sex education," two of the terms listed on the ET page investigator provided a link to, show no results linking to ET in the first fifty hits (I stopped looking at 50).

A search for "actinide series elements" has ET as the fifth ranked site. "Actinide elements" returns ET at #15, "actinide series" at 9.

"Aesthetic realism movement" has ET ranked as the third page, but all other hits in the top 20 contain only the phrase "aesthetic realism." A search for this term does not contain a hit for ET in the top 50.

In short, the more specific and less common the search term is, the more likely you are to find ET in the top results. Also, most of the terms listed on this supposedly spam-generating page include the word(s) "essay," "term paper," and "dissertation," meaning that ET is focusing its efforts on people specifically looking for research examples, not general information on the subject, meaning it is well-honed and focused (and rule abiding) SEO.

On a final note, Google's own definition of a doorway page is one that contains "large sets of poor-quality pages where each page is optimized for a specific keyword or phrase. In many cases, doorway pages are written to rank for a particular phrase and then funnel users to a single destination." The fact that there are well over a hundred unrelated phrases on the page you link to (I didn't take the time to count) means that, according to Google's interpretation of its own rules, this page does not fit the criteria of a spamming doorway page.

May I ask what your interest in the matter is?

pheelyks, on the other hand, plz, try "Essay on Admiralty law", "term paper on admiralty law" and so on, well, yeah, I guess that's just what your point was.

However, you should not stick to the link I've provided, forget it! I did not mean that this particular page is spam; what I meant, is that from this particular page you can trace the pattern of the overall spam framework, thousands of nearly identical pages to which this particular page links.

Just check out and compare any two or more pages and their content.

/topics/african_american_folklore_essays_papers.html
/topics/african_american_leadership_essays_papers.html

You will find the standard set of meaningless verbal gibberish followed by an imbedded frame with pre-written term paper samples.
The gibberish looks something like this (the keyword is different on every page)

"For eight years, our African American Leadership thesis experts have assisted students in every country by providing the most extensive, lowest-priced service for African American Leadership research papers and essay writing. Regardless of your deadline, budget, specifications, or academic level, we can provide immediate help for your African American Leadership essay, term paper, book report, research paper, dissertation, thesis, or university writing studies."

The purpose of Essay Research Team on this matter is absolutely clear. Make up as many keywords as you can and build the identical type of a webpage for that keyword. No matter what the user inputs in a search engine he/she will discover that Essay Research Team experts "have assisted" students on the particular research paper topic "for years", moreover, their service on this particular term paper topic has been always "lowest priced" (which is by the way a genuine lie, since Essay Research Team 's service is amongst most expensive on the internet.

Have they ever heard of false advertising? First they lie that their experts have written papers on the particular topic for years (may or may not be true, since nobody really knows, it's just 10,000th keyword on the Essay Research Team 's website); then they lie that their service has been the cheapest.

I don't know about you, but it sounds pretty bad to me. My interest in this matter is rather clear: any service that uses shady, deceitful or unethical methods to attract unsuspecting clientele should be avoided like plague. Good riddance to essay relief! Yet it appears that in many regards Essay Research Team went even further in its deception, whether intended or not.

Seriously-why do all of these fraudsters continue to attack ET constantly?

The base product for sale on every page is different, stu4 sidekick. Literally thousands of companies (in all industries) employ the same type of template-based database to advertise their different products. Would anyone like me to post examples from MAJOR corporations? "Investigator" is anything but, its argument is senseless, and this thread should be closed.

Another threat... another example of how different people operate here and secure their interests..

Please stop maligning the English language.

On a more substantive level, have you noticed how (in)effective WB's requests to the moderator have been? Personally, I am for the completely free flow of ideas, even lies and insults. Let people judge each other for who they really are, and like it or not this forum seems to encourage people to let their freak flag fly.

Exactly!!! Please forward your suggestion to WB and OR too because they always self assume themselves as truth bearers and force their opinions on others...

I felt that way for a long time. Try putting up with it virtually every day for 2 years, as I have, and you might change your position. It is ruining the forum in more ways than one.

WB, that's right there are thousands of companies out there that are lazy (in providing any unique content), deceitful (in providing false or inaccurate information about its products) and greedy.

You've called me a fraudster for no reason; or rather for my effort to protect people from fraud, which clearly exposes you as a person whose agenda here is clear-and-cut.

Fortunately, it is unlikely that you have directs contacts in Google whom I have already contacted with details of this apparent violation. I also urge other individuals here to do the same: isn't it what this forum is for?

One can close the thread, but it is much harder to shut down the truth which will eventually surface.

Just wait and see...

You have been trying hard to post lies and insults here for last 2 years.....


This is what they do here always.. anyone who challenges them or expose them is fraudster and cheat... This is the unwritten rule of this forum.. if you do not comply your thread is removed or even your account is blocked.. I am really amazed as to why not they blocked your account yet

For the 5th time, please quote ONE "lie" that I have posted.

You've already been banned once, and I'm sure that the mod's next banning will prevent you from making new usernames.

You misunderstand. What I mean is, let everyone say whatever they want about companies, writers, customers, and each other, and let everyone else decide for themselves who to believe. Neither you nor WB nor anyone else should want to have someone else's voice squashed just so their point sounds better.


I'm in a quoting mood...

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
-often (mis)attributed to Voltaire (who would have said it in French if he HAD said it)

This is the only way a forum can maintain any integrity. Though it seems paradoxical to ensure that protecting lies actually ensures integrity, this is the way a true democracy has to work. Let people decide for themselves; chacha and EW consistently avoid the real arguments anyway. Discerning readers will know who to trust. Besides, I've always found that less intelligent customers are harder to work for (they don't explain themselves well).

Another threat


This whole forum contains all the lies you have posted.. your each post is pack of lies..

If this is the case, could you please pick one of WB's lies and post it as the proof she requested? It would prove once and for all that you understand English better than your writing suggests.

Again, I apologize for the crankiness.

This is what has been done on this forum. Every voice against WB and OR has been squashed.. If you believe in justice, truth and fairness, you must have the courage to listen to the ideas of others..

Proof of lies
"LOL, and he claims that I am the one who is vulgar and abusive. I would love for him to prove any of these claims against me. Where are the instances of me checking somebody who didn't deserve it?" essayscam.org/forum/es/indian-company-http-buy-dissertation-com-legit-not-1119/

Please have a look at this
"WB on mothers:

WritersBeware:
Your mother is a pathetic failure, having raised such a worthless sack of skin. Rest assured, you will get what you deserve (all 130, dog-eating lbs. of you), in more ways than one. " essayscam.org/forum/es/it-mean-american-company-customers-1121/2 /

"WritersBeware:
Is that your dog that I smell cooking? Is your failed, w*0re of a mother sweating it out behind the grill?

WritersBeware:
Is that supposed to be your mother's gaping mouth?

WritersBeware:
Your mother must be proud of the disgusting pig of a criminal that you became . . . . I'll send my regrets on Mother's Day."

essayscam.org/forum/es/it-mean-american-company-customers-1121/2/

The above contradictory posts clearly indicate who is a lier here?

I believe in these things. I listen to you (or at least read what you type). I also disagree with you and think that you have no business working as a writer of English, and I think any company that hires you for this type of work is necessarily fraudulent.


Yes, WB's venom can get the better of her sometimes, and I am even willing to concede (sorry, WB) that she understates her level of engagement in such verbal mudslinging, but could you please provide us with a verifiable lie of WB's against a company or person in regards to their legitimacy, as is the main point and purpose of this forum?

Can you trust a person who openly lie and claim that she don't?
In first post she throws a challenge to prove that she is vulger and abusive.. Subsequent posts show the kind of language used by her... and you still need a verification?


And company which hires you is legit? I am really sorry but your assumption that a company which hires writers writing good english can not be fraudlent?

I have openly admitted that the combined efforts of multiple fraudsters at once, every day for 2 years, has definitely gotten to me. At the same time, for the sake of the forum, I have gone out of my way to avoid direct communication with the main culprit. As one can see, despite my efforts, the harassment has not stopped (and will never stop), simply because I post verifiable evidence of fraud that certain members do not want exposed.

Chacha, I understood the intent of your original post without your needing to render it explicit. I even already conceded your point, insignificant as it is, in this instance.

In response to your question, I do not think that misperceiving and even misrepresenting your emotional responses to certain situations (such as typing angry insults at someone) necessarily means that one cannot be trusted in matters of objective and verifiable logic and facts.

Therefore, I will ask again, could you please quote a verifiable lie of WB's that has something to do with the true purpose of this forum, i.e. a claim of fraud by a company or writer that was unfounded?

Would you believe in the evidence of a person who post contradictory claims here? Who continousely lie and challenge others to prove her wrong? even in the court of law, you can not be produced as a witness if it is proved that you often lie...

You need to take a course in logic. I mean this seriously, and not as an insult. You are conflating my argument with a different logical meaning. My claim was that a company that claims to hire good English writers, and that also hires you, is by definition fraudulent because you cannot write in English well. A company that hires me COULD be fraudulent, but they aren't NECESSARILY fraudulent because they hire me--seeing as how I can write a grammatically correct sentence.

Before you misinterpret this as an admission of fraud, understand this (here is where a basic logic lesson would really come in handy): you cane never PROVE that any given company is not fraudulent. This constitutes proving a negative, and is one of the most basic logical impossibilities.

True purpose of this forum is to prove everyone as cheat and fraud except sites owned and operated by WB, OR and others..

Please show me the law from which you are getting this information. What are the requirements for proving that someone lies often? And why can;t you perform the simple task asked of you?

I'm going to try sleeping again. Debating chacha is like taking a double dose of dramamine, but gives a greater sense of satisfaction (I'm easily contented).

Have you ever read the basic principles of natural law? Please read the principles of equity from Common Law of England...
In the meantime please answer my simple question:
Would you believe in a person who lie?

Pheelyks, at this point, I think it's probably best that people

Natural law, according to most political philosophers (Locke, Hume, and Rousseau for a start) means the laws of nature--of strength over weakness, and what is actually a state of lawlessness. English Common Law is not only comprised of a vast amount of texts and traditions, but is also unenforceable on its own.

By now, the US and the UK have developed codified laws governing such things as who is allowed to be called as a witness. It is my understanding that anyone who claims to have pertinent information may be called, and the through cross examination any lies may be exposed (and lying under oath comes with its own criminal penalties). If your claim is correct, please point me to the section of US or UK or Indian or Sri Lankan code that defines a liar.


Asked and answered, but to clarify: lying or misrepresenting emotions and logic are two very different things.

He'll just choke on it anyway, WB.

Would you consider following statements as lie or not?

In first statement she claims she is not a vulgar and abusive.. subsequent statements show the kind of language she uses.. so her first statement is a confirmed lie....

A person who lies once will always be a lier..

I request all of you to read following posts by WB and decide yourself who is lying??? who is more credible? What criteria you will use to judge the claims of a lier?

"LOL, and he claims that I am the one who is vulgar and abusive. I would love for him to prove any of these claims against me. Where are the instances of me checking somebody who didn't deserve it?"

Please have a look at this
"WB on mothers:

WritersBeware:
Your mother is a pathetic failure, having raised such a worthless sack of skin. Rest assured, you will get what you deserve (all 130, dog-eating lbs. of you), in more ways than one. "

"WritersBeware:
Is that your dog that I smell cooking? Is your failed, w*0re of a mother sweating it out behind the grill?

WritersBeware:
Is that supposed to be your mother's gaping mouth?

WritersBeware:
Your mother must be proud of the disgusting pig of a criminal that you became . . . . I'll send my regrets on Mother's Day."

The above contradictory posts clearly indicate who is a lier here?


Misrepresentation is a lie too...


All subsequent laws use common law as the source.. one way or other common law is the root of all laws..


She will never do this otherwise her masters may kick her out of job

Yes it certainly does. It indicates that your English is HORRID!

Don't try to hide your inability to argue.... Prove what you have posted here or vanish

prove what??? that you are silly? you have proved that already :)

True. I have already proved you and your friends as cheat and fraud

If you believe so, who am I to argue? Acknowledging your posts certainly does prove that I am an idiot. You need professional help ...

So you finally admitted that you are an idiot

OR, "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert" Charles Darwin :)

You are quoting a person who has been proved as a liar and cheat by many... a person who fabricated evidence to prove his theory

Really?! Hmm.

molwick.com/en/evolution/034-darwinism.html
harunyahya.com/en.m_categorie_76.php

Ok, I know where you're from.........

Ummm....no. Driving laws, computer/internet laws, laws dividing the radio spectrum...these are just a few areas of law that have no roots in common law. Common law also provides little to no protection to women and minorities. And you have yet to cite any passage, from common law or anywhere else, backing up your claim that proven liars cannot be called as witnesses. Is there any proof, or is it just another moronic assertion?


Please follow your own advice. Back up what you have previously said, as I have repeatedly asked you to, or go away.

Chacha, I followed the links you provided that "prove" Darwin was a cheat and a liar. the first takes us to a page full of scientific criticism s of Darwin's theory. Like any scientific theory, it has been adjusted as time goes on--this page actually supports the theory of evolution, merely pointing out some of the areas in which Darwin's own theory was weak or insubstantial. Even Einstein and Newton got some things wrong; this is the way science works.

The second website is devoted to the Islamic faith and its denigration of evolution. Whole there is nothing wrong with the Muslim religion, it does not provide scientifically valid arguments. Neither does any form of Christianity, or Judaism, or Buddhism, Hinduism, etc.--they are all religions and therefore based on faith rather than logic. Like your arguments.