jadenb 2 | 8 Student
Jan 17, 2014 | #1
By presenting someone else's work as their own they would be in breach of any plagiarism policy at any university. The papers might pass a plagiarism scan, but there's always the chance that a tutor will spot the signs of an essay that hasn't been written by its submitter - disparity in writing style, for example.
theguardian
This is the link from the Guardian, which explains why you should write your essay by yourself.
For those potential customers who may be hesitant about whether to place an order with essay-writing companies or any individual writers, please think carefully before making any decisions. (Of course, if you'd like to take the risk, it's totally up to you).This link is absolutely reliable. This is meant to protect potential customers. Of course, I do think there's a slim chance of getting decent writers. If you do find one, please buy Lotto! You're incredibly lucky !
There's a thread about law teacher written by me. Please read it as soon as possible before it's removed. That thread has been closed.
This site is very likely to be crooked. If they had done nothing wrong, who are they so scared of being discussed? After all, I'm not slandering them. I've provided reliable sources to support my idea. For those people who try to argue that the passage by the Guardian is unreliable , they are very likely to be writers who are fraudsters !
It's simple logic. Whose opinion do you tend to trust? The Guardian's or the opinion from someone whom you don't know in the forum?
Of course, I do not agree to the idea of submitting the work without any amendment. You won't learn anything. However, I'm shocked at the quality of essay in which lawteacher or perhaps other companies provide. For example, in order to help you write a 2.1 essay, a decent reference guide should at least consist of
1. cases correctly used
2. all the necessary cases required for essay used
3. all the necessary legislation used
4. include relevant journal articles as opposed to giving you some references which are irrelevant to the sentence being quoted
5. give suggestions as to how to critically analyse the issue (which is the key to a 2.1)
As the essay they provide does not even qualify to be a normal reference guide, their way of doing business is so nasty.
You can have done it yourself.
Even though I know it's old-fashioned to talk about conscience nowadays, I didn't expect the quality is so crappy. It's even worse than the Q&A reference guide from the bookstore. At least correct cases have been used in those Q&A reference books. However, I don't recommend those Q &A books cos they're too descriptive, which makes me place an order with essay-writing company and pay for a FXXking expensive lesson.
Actually, it is not difficult to understand the situation. If writers provide a genuine 2.1 or even a first-class essay, they need to spend so much time on research and amending the draft for a number of times before giving the paper to customers. This can imply they cannot take up multiple jobs at the same time. If they want to make more money, they will focus on the quantity instead of quality. After all, what the market aims at is first-time customers. This kind of strategy fits perfectly for essay-writing companies and writers.
