Melissa, or OxbridgeExpert, keep it up. We are loving every moment. Don't fret too much, though. Soon enough, you will find out how and why we all know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that you are Melissa Kelly.

The mods aren't deleting any of this, Melissa :) Write to them and threaten to sue, but they still aren't deleting. Melissa (OxbridgeExpert), ever wondered why they allow you to post after having been caught "borrowing" from this forum?

Keep it up, lassie :)

Thank you for solving the mystery of your identity.

Like it :) I believe that it is the first witty thing you have ever come up with in your life. I really do not mind your calling me that. As I am neither retarded nor a tosser, doesn't bother me.


I am not on a first name basis with you and never consented to your addressing me without prefix! You, Melissa, may only refer to me as the Right Honourable What a Retard Tosser! Don't ever forget yourself again or assume that you are my equal.

No comment :)
Pheelyks ... please take over.


SOS Pheelyks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's not get into the IRA or mention Britain's actions in Ireland. I do not debate history or contentious political issues with those who know nothing.

You have revealed yourself as a thoroughly ugly and horribly mean-spirited person. Go on, make Ted Kennedy your punching bag ... In so doing, you are exposing your utterly twisted and evil personality. You support our release of the Lockerbie bomber (nothing alleged about that)? Figures ...

Isn't it anti-psychotic meds and beddy-bye time? If you want to avoid night terrors, put yourself out of your own mind and focus, instead, on all the lovely characters right here, on this forum. Think of What a Retarded Tosser (affectionately known as WRT), WB, Phleeky, American_writer, TexasMoron, JenniferAA "the resident evil one," Nathraq the Anthrax, etc and it will be Sweet Dreams :) Good night, sleep tight and don't let the bed bugs bite.


WB!!!!!! Help!

I hate run-ons, verbiage and the blatant disregard of basic punctuation rules. Why aren't there any comas? Do comas scare you as much as making sense does?

I am going to sue you on behalf of the English language.

You are something else, you really are.

Mods, edit out that horribly evil and mean comment, please. It is beyond despicable.



Everybody ... proof that OxbridgeExpert isn't Melissa.

As you guessed, I am not worried. Could be a consequence of my idiocy (which you detected) or ... maybe I know something which you don't?

Correction ... maybe most here know volumes more than you do?

Please stick to the topic. You said that in the UK we are allowed to proclaim our support for terrorists and make statements such as "GO OSAMA" on public forums. I replied that we are not and that there are quite a few laws which criminalise such behaviour. Care to counter-argue that point? Care to dispute the fact that our Counter-Terrorist Unit would, if informed of your very vocal support, call you in for questioning and berate you (they won't believe that you are a terrorist but they will teach you a lesson)? Want to bet that the racist coments you have made here could land you in tremendous trouble were any to report you? Britain, US, Australia ... are very cooperative over matters such as this.

Freakish, fiendish, friendless descendant of Black Heart. You may well hold the key to one of the most enduring mysteries in English history. Did your ancestor really murder the princes or was there some truth to the Warbeck and Simnel claims? I am rather partial to the Warbeck claim as Elizabeth of York identified him as her brother? If you let me in on your family secret, I will be nice ...


I think I am falling in love with you, American_writer! Have always been partial to the witty and intelligent ones amongst us :)

You caught me :(


Actually, we can't. The US has the Patriot Act and we have the Terrorism Act of 2000, the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act of 2001, the Prevention of Terrorism Act of 2005, the Terrorism Act of 2006 and the Counter-Terrorism Act of 2008. In fact, our version of the Patriot Act predates the United States as we had this little problem called the IRA.

Think before you type.

Seriously :) Fantastical gibberish, even for you. However, if anyone wants to assume that I am Melissa, feel free. I won't get my panties in a twist. In fact, were I to claim that

Pheelyks was Melissa
WB was Melissa
JenniferAA was Melissa
AsianWriter was Melissa
and so on, none would even bother to defend themselves against that charge.

Question Time OxbridgeExpert:
1) Asif4444 posted on this forum first to attack JenniferAA and then to stalk WB and xx, who has since left the forum
2) Asif4444's account was terminated and the OxbridgeExpert member suddenly appeared - on the spot - and picked up where Asif4444 left off, stalking and attacking just two members

3) When xx left the forum, OxbridgeExpert left
4) After a long period of inactivity, OxbridgeExpert came back when this thread was created

Lesson in IP concealing: Any who run an IP concealer (or false location) software on their computer, tend to overlook the fact that they connected to the software through their ISP. It can, therefore, be tracked back to them. Also, the simplest of tools immediately detect whether or not a poster is using a proxy server. It is, in other words, impossible to hide your net footprints.

And did you not bid us all farewell, adieu?

Some of the wildest theories out there are more believable than then one she's promoting :)

And my blooming history teacher told us that Richard III, Black Heart, had died childless and without progeny!

:)
OxbridgeExpert, Melissa, do you know the penalty for false accusations?

Here's Melissa's story:
xx's jealousy drove her or him to accuse Melissa of "borrowing" her web programming. Consumed with jealousy, xx began to market Melissa's websites, hacked into Melissa's server and uploaded "borrowed" content. Poor Melissa never realised, even though much of what was borrowed has, according to Google caches, been up there for months. That was not enough for xx, so she or he created the OxbridgeExpert username and began to stalk him or herself, and defame his or her own company. All of OxbridgeExpert's first 30+ posts revolved around xx. But, guess what? xx was behind it all. Then, xx hacked into Melissa's emails, all of them, and began sending out emails to all and sundry.

Poor Melissa had to go to the Feds and report xx.

In my opinion, xx is insane.

Isn't it strange that all of Melissa's designers copied all of her websites from other companies? Isn't it strange that she has done this to several companies but is not guilty? Either innocent mistake or that insane devil, xx, is behind it all.

Melissa, OxbridgeExpert, your explanations are more damning than your crimes.

Do you know that even if you use an IP concealer, it still can be traced through your ISP? Have you ever heard of cyber forensics? Are you quite quite sure that you never ever posted once using your own IP ... think back.

Do you know that by accusing xx of hacking, the accusations have to be supported or else you will be in deep trouble?

I am not, by the way, xx. I do, however, know who xx is.

AmericanWriter, you have highlighted the source of the most pressing problem confronting this industry. Individuals with no ties, whatsoever, to the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, etc. can legally claim that they are British/American. This is entirely due to the phenomenon of online company formation agencies. An Indian, Ukrainian, Pakistani (pick any nationality) can log onto any company formation agency, pay something like $50 and, within a few short hours, be a legally registered British/American company. The primary problem is that the owners, Directors or person legally responsible for the company, are almost completely beyond the reach of the law. If you, as the Director, owner, etc., are British, you are obliged to adhere to very strict laws AND pay taxes. Should we engage in blatantly false advertising, fail to provide a service whose quality satisfies the purpose for which it was purchase or does not meet with our advertised quality standards, etc etc., we are in trouble. Should we fail to uphold our guarantees, we are in trouble. Basically, we have to walk the straight and narrow but they do not. Why? Because we are within the reach of the law, they are not. Can we defraud customers and refuse to pay writers their dues? No, we can't. They can, though.

This online company formation thing is a disaster. It has brought a host of scammers into the industry; has given them the right to claim that they are British or American, despite the fact that they are not bound by the law as we are. So what if they get caught and their companies get shut down? They will just reform, using a different name.

If the Ukrainians, etc. want to operate in this industry, so be it. No problem. At the very least, however, they should be forced to register their companies in countries where the directors/owners are legally accountable - Ukraine! Same with everybody else - register in the country where the owner/Director is legally accountable and is a citizen and resident of.

Sorry for going on about this but it really does get to me.

The English is too proper and the demeanour too courteous. Melissa is not capable of either.

Honestly, she should be locked up. She has been caught redhanded and instead of apologising or showing remorse, all she has done is accuse all of jealousy because of her `superior' capabilities. As she really does not understand what she has done wrong and is accusing almost everybody of fabricating evidence, hacking her websites, hacking into her email accounts, several are now taking her to court. Much of what she has done is criminal. There will be criminal charges, therefore. Melissa is going down with a bang which will echo throughout the industry.

Masterpapers, are you people okay with her theft of your name, webcopy and testimonials? Melissa has "borrowed" from you people. Any updates on your front?

Absolutely true. Not to mention the fact that they are not supposed to submit our work as their own.

Anyone care to guess the percentage who submit our work for academic credit? Most deny doing so but can't say I believe them.

No. Confirmed. Profile has been deleted.

Doesn't she realise that it really makes her look even guiltier than she already is and, attempts to `hide' are futile?

Melissa, we know that you are hanging about here, reading all of this. Read your below quoted posts to JenniferAA. As far as we all know, Jennifer did not email OxbridgeExpert and she did not threaten OxbridgeExpert with legal action. She emailed Melissa and threatened the criminal, Melissa. Why is OxbridgeExpert responding? Because she is MELISSA! She read Jennifer's email to Melissa because OxbridgeExpert is Melissa; she took the threat directed at Melissa personally, because she is Melissa. Still want to deny it? Now that we know (we always knew) that you are OxbridgeExpert, care to count the number of people and companies you have libelled here?

Tried that. It gave me a "Profile Does Not Exist" message :)

Yes, good move on WB's part coz guess who deleted her facebook profile?! Melissa does not have a facebook profile anymore :)

Melissa, Oxbridge or whatever, were you really innocent and if you truly had nothing to fear, why go to the extreme lengths of deleting your facebook? Too late for that, though. With her trademark foresight, WB ensured the preservation of your (ugly) pictures.

I once asked you to think before you type. It was good advice but you chose to ignore it. Anyway, please allow me to walk you through this ...

All students use our services to improve their grades. Hence, most (I would say all) will use the model researches we provide "for a grade." Submitting the paper, as is, for academic credit is not, I repeat IS NOT, the sole method of usage for grade. There are others:

1) using the paper as a model for the composition of their own research, is using it for a grade
2) using the paper as a review of all the relevant sources on the topic, is using it for a grade (here the students will use the sources which we included in the research, thereby saving them the time of having to collect the sources themselves)

3) using and studying the paper for exam preparation purposes, is using it for a grade.

Stu4, there are countless ways of legitimately using the model researches we provide, for a grade. Your being completely attuned to the illegitimate and illegal usages, is interesting. That you were completely incapable of identifying the various legitimate ways in which a paper may be used for a grade, speaks volumes about your character and commercial operation.

I want to clarify that by `we' I am referring to writers who serve as managers in this industry.

Stu4, I really want you to understand that our opposition to you and your company has nothing at all with your being Ukrainian. However you try to argue this, the irrelevancy of nationality remains an unchallanged fact.

Why are we opposed to you? Your business practices are not ethical and are harming the reputation of the entire industry.

You have faciliated the entry of absolutely unqualified `writers' into this industry. They are neither educated nor capable of researching and writing in English. These writers are ignorant of the fundamental principles of research, they plagiarise, produce sloppy work and, because of you people, have become the `face' of the industry. Many of the writer applications we reject are from people with top status at ResearchWritingCenter, AllWriting, EssayWriters and Academia-Research. You have debased our profession. Would it really have hurt you to exercise some hiring standards?

You cheat writers. I believe that some of your fines may be justified according to your guidelines but, that is not the issue. Why should you have a fining policy in the first place? Since when do professional writer-researchers make grammatical errors? Since when do they plagiarise? Were you hiring qualified writers, you would not need a fine policy. You, however, do not hire qualified writers but prefer to look for cheap, unqualified ones. Another thing which I seriously do not understand - why are you keeping on the writers who have been caught plagiarising and why, on earth, are you holding onto those who have proven, time after time, that they cannot write English? Again, you are debasing our profession and students, on the receiving end of horrid work, walk away with the impression that all are like you.

You cheat customers. You tell them that you your writers are all academically qualified when, in truth, many are undergrad students. You tell them that all your writers are Native English language speakers when all but a handful are very poor quality ESL. When you guys lie, we are all assumed to be just like you until we prove otherwise.

You lie about your achievements and create fictitious industry awards which you then give yourselves. This is both fraud and unfair competition.

You lie about your date of incorporation.

You lie about your home country.

You lie about the number of writers you have.

You lie about the number of orders you have fulfilled and customers you have served.

You engage in blatantly fraudulent advertising and marketing.

Your dishonesty affects all of us. You have brought the industry down and have played a seminal role in popular perceptions of our services as illegal. Our services are not illegal but because your activities are either in the grey or red areas, people assume that this has to be illegal.

When we oppose and fight you, we are not doing so because you are Ukrainian; when we support any and all efforts to close you down, we are not doing so because we fear competition; we are doing so because your business practices are unethical and directly harm all of us.

When your actions threaten our reputation and our economic interests, we will fight and expose you.

Stu4 - look towards your practices and clean up your act; do not try to present this as an anti-Ukrainian, anti-Asian, anti-competition or anti-ESL writers issue. It is not and you know it is not. Most here, despite your best efforts, know it is not.

I just love those short, sharp one-liners :)

Like that :)


Spoken like a gentleman. Melissa, however, is not a `lady' and, the only thing she needs to be protected from is her own inherently dishonest nature.

I thought it would be. It goes against statements to the effect that we are providing models. Correction time :(


That's it Pheelyks - customers are not (absolutely not) allowed to turn it in as their own. We do not tell them to reference our work properly but, very explicitly warn them against turning it in for academic credit, and clarify that they are only supposed to use it as a guide. However, when we guarantee grades, I believe this contradicts with that which we are warning against.

I could go on and on about how we mean that we are guaranteeing A-quality, etc., rather than the grade the marker would award them, but that would be a load of BS. Reason is that we have not explained that part clearly enough to customers. Thanks to all of you here, I have decided to go with what I feel is right. I will make that part about grades very very clear and plaster it all over the sites in large print.

Am worried about customer reaction, though. It is, however, a risk I feel we should take.

That's one of the things which has always bothered me. Where I work, we guarantee 2:1 quality, A-grade quality, etc. There are two problems with that. First, grading is subjective and I believe that this should be clarified. Second, as writers, aren't we just supposed to do our level-best and produce good work, irrespective of the grade ordered?

Question: were companies to remove the grade option, how would customers react?

Karen, your info is incomplete.
Delivery Deadline
Grade
Academic Level
All these variables factor into the price.

I am not sure whether it is okay to post this info, though. Best to ask WB.

An awfully intelligent, educated and cultured person. All can see that except She of Superior Idiocy and I find it galling, to say the least.

Be my guest, you nitwit. Take legal action on what basis? Here goes - you are Melissa and I am calling you an intellectual property thief, a cheat, liar and plagiariser. Guess what, Melissa? That is not libel because it is the truth. I am calling you a thief, cheat and liar without qualm and will not deny doing so. Should you wish to sue for libel, go ahead. The evidence will be presented and you will discover that, as long as this statement is supported by facts, it is not libel.

I am calling you, OxbridgeExpert, Melissa; I am also calling you Asif4444 and truthprevails. Again, this is not libel because it is a statement of fact. I, and I daresay others, would not be so bold were we not in possession of the necessary undeniable evidence.

Another thing dumbo, supposing you are not Melissa, calling you Melissa is not libel. Guess why? Because this means we do not know who you are and one cannot libel an anonymous person. Our comments and criticisms are directed to you, as Melissa; if you are not, then you have absolutely no grounds for even suggesting that any here libelled you.

You, on the other hand, are guilty of libel and many other crimes. If you know a lawyer, ask him or her, why.

Tw%t, you are adhering to very odd posting hours for a Brit. Could it be because you are Australian?

AsianWriter, as you earlier mentioned, it may be a cultural thing. I understand that in the East - the more conservative cultures - privacy is jealously guarded. Western culture has a comparable respect for privacy but the common good trumps individual rights. The right to privacy (to some degree), takes a back seat to the public good. It is a common, socially responsible, practice to publicise the photos of criminals. The purpose of doing so is both their exposition and the cautioning of those who may come into direct interaction with them. Added to that, it could aid in the more accurate identification of the person in question, and the voluntary provision of important information such as current contact details, other possible criminal activities, etc.

Melissa rescinded her right to privacy upon her engagement in the persistent violation of our rights.

More to the point, the photos are right there on the internet (public domain) and, hence, may be posted.

Realistically speaking, you are absolutely right; day dreaming is sometimes very comforting and pleasant, though :)

An awfully interesting question, Major. The short answer: yes, the custom writing industry will still be around. Ever-increasing demand will (I believe) ensure its survival and continued expansion.

The long answer: As those who have been around from the beginning know, the industry has changed a great deal. The original players (the industry founders) were, by and large, professionals. Fines were unheard of, payment was prompt and we were required to sign real (service-provider) contracts, present proof of our qualifications, nationality and address. By and large, the writers were qualified and company owners and managers ran a good operation.

The realisation that this industry had tremendous room for growth and was, in a way, a money machine, encouraged a great many semi-literate and absolutely unqualified individuals to enter the market. The rise of the Asian and Eastern European companies, changed the industry (for the worse). The foreign entrants are all about the quick buck, cheap writers, quantity over quality and, to put it bluntly, consumer fraud. As Major insinuated, they lie about date of incorporation, experience, writer qualifications, nationality and quality of service.

What I am trying to say is that we have fallen very far from what we once were. The rules of the game have changed on us and we are all being stereotyped as `scammers,' plagiarism-enablers, etc. The real writers, by and large, are being equated with the ignoramuses; the good companies are having to defend themselves against the systematic attacks launched against them by the Asian and Eastern European ones. It has all changed.

In my opinion, the industry will survive and will continue to change. I believe (maybe wishful thinking) that change, this time, will be for the better. I think that the scammers will, eventually, be pushed out, the shoddy writers will be banned and the industry will regain its legitimacy.

And I honestly respect that.

All criminals have their pictures posted as a strategy for warning any who may come into contact with them. What WB did was the socially responsible thing.


Please allow me to bring you up to speed as I have read the post history.
Melissa, an unapologetic and thoroughly devious criminal, has posted on this forum using the following handles:

1) Jennifer199
2) truthprevails (which also happens to be her essayscamalert.com slogan)
3) OxbridgeExpert
4) Asif4444

A few months back, she was accused of the same crimes and was confronted. She responded by attacking each and every one who crossed her path and, actively stalked some members. Melissa did not, however, take down any of the sites which were exposed as copied from others. Instead, she expanded her thieving activities, becoming bolder and bolder, ripping off one site after the other. Melissa repeatedly claimed ownership of sites which had never even heard of her and in countless other cases, association with established companies.

Melissa, using various names, has viciously attacked numerous forum members.

She is on record as having hired programmers to clone sites and their programmes. Hacking?

She has no integrity and believes her actions justifiable. Why? Simply because she is violently allergic to the concept of honesty.

To top it all up, Melissa is a vile racist.

Do not be folled by the fact that she recently took down her sites. She did so because she's afraid of WB. As soon as she assumes that all this has died down, they will be up again and the copies will still be plagiarised.

Is calling you a Melissa a crime, Melissa?


Doesn't bother me at all.

Why are you taking being called Melissa so personally?

I didn't get so hot and bothered when Jennifer199 (Melissa) assumed I was someone she knew and accused me of being jealous of her. It ain't true and doesn't bother me.

I didn't get my panties in a twist when you called me a catamite; ain't true so no skin off my back.

Nathraq didn't even bother to respond to your countless vulgar insults; figments of your imagination so meant nothing.

WB obviously doesn't care about being called a `Wendy.' Not true so why should she respond?

You are the only one, Oxbridge, who goes ballistic when called Melissa. Granted, being called a Melissa is infinitely worse than all of the insults you ever threw our way ...

As I said, Oxbridge, denounce Melissa as a lying, thieving scammer. Go on, denounce Melissa. It is simple enough. When asked to do it, I did. Tell us all about how her thievery, ammorality and deviousness sickens you. Advise everybody not to go anywhere near her scam sites. Go on, Oxbridge, do it. Denounce her with explicit reference to her sites and all her criminal activities as established by the evidence presented.

Naff off, Melissa.

At the very very least, admit that Melissa is horribly ugly. She looks like an ugly schoolboy. Admit that. Tell us all about how much her pictures turned your stomach.

She looks quite crazy, don't you think? Madness is clearly etched across her face and her eyes are quite crazy. Would you agree?


Absolutely true. Cold war era, and its wars-by-proxy, was crazy and we are all paying the price today. Wanted to skirt over that, however, because the morons would hardly understand any of this and could, therefore, fly with it :(

Moderators, do not delete the above post, please. Keep it up there.

You will, Melissa, soon regret the day you were born.

You are too dumb to know what irony is.


Oxbridge, we know you are Melissa. This is not something we suspect but, know. Your denials mean very very little.


Were you British, you'd know all about the Civil Contingencies Bill. You would also know that were any here to report you, you'd be in deep deep trouble. Push Melissa, continue pushing, and I will. Even in Australia, public support of terrorism is illegal - threat to national security and all that.

By the way, those IP masking tools - not very reliable.

A father he never really knew? A father who was never ever educated in the UK but only in Kenya and the US? Please cite your source.


Had you been British, you would not have dared say that. Have you ever heard of Crimes of the British Empire? Do you have any notion of exactly how many we slaughtered during the course of our `benevolent rule'? Let's not even mention our arrogant elimination of countries, displacement of populations, the carving up of countries and the redrawing of historic national boundaries. Have you ever heard of the Kurds? That might be too difficult for you so, how about this: IRELAND! We systematically killed languages, sought the obliteration of a neighbour and the oppression, at the pain of death, of its people. All that which Ireland has suffered is traceable to us. I am quite sure Sands and others would just love to hear your theories on British benevolence. Only a criminal would stand up in defense of the British Empire.


I am sure Gandhi would agree ...

You ignorant, arrogant, racist fool ...

My graduate degree in political economy (amongst the other graduate and post-graduate academic qualifications I hold), says otherwise. In brief, capitalist/liberal market economic systems are self-adjusting. While equilibrium is the ideal, a state of debt and, at other times, of surplus, are the norm. The current crisis has not been brought about by capitalism per se but, because there had occured a state of serious disequilibrium, overevaluation of assets and, of course, the failure of the SCLO system (due to lack of proper oversight). We are now experiencing a state of adjustment, of movement towards equilibrium. This involves the revaluation of the previously overevaluated assets. It may take a couple of years for the results to show but, in the interim, it is necessary to prevent the deepening of the crisis. The strategy for doing so (whether we are ideologically opposed to it, or not) is bailouts. The point, Stu4, is that the crisis cannot be attributed to capitalism, per se but, to mismanagement and, the solution lies in maintaining the integrity of the operational the liberal market system.


Not borrowing but, spending.


Communism is slavery, not capitalism. Besides, if you are ideologically adverse to capitalism, move to North Korea, mainland China, Cuba, etc. Don't live within the bounds of a system which you are opposed to and, at the very least, do not try to exploit it for personal financial gain.


Iraq was a war of choice and unecessary. Afganistan was a war of necessity, a just war.


I sincerely doubt it.

Melissa, you've made yourself a friend! Stu4. Like you, his questionable practices have left him quite friendless. Maybe you two could hook up? You're made for one another.


Is that supposed to make sense?


Have you lost the very last one of your marbles?


Look at it this way, Stu4. Over the past twenty years, the United States has forked over 1.6 billion in aid money to your country. Have you any inkling of its global financial aid figure for 2008? Check it, please. Then, come back here and tell us that it is alright for the US to give Ukraine aid and that it is absolutely fine for it to fork out billions per annum to developing economies,, but it should not use American money to try and save US industries and stem unemployment rates.

Where on earth do you people get your facts from? A public healthcare option makes the US socialist? Well, as it has a strong welfare state tradition, Britain must be socialist too. As for Sandinavia, it appears that this group of countries is fanatically communist.

Please think before you type, Stu4.

Crass, vulgar and vile ignoramus.

Naff off, girlie.

Insane with hunger.