EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Posts by ProfessorVerb / Posting Activity: ☆☆ 192
I am: Freelance Writer - Regular / United States 
Joined: May 27, 2011
Last Post: Dec 09, 2024
Threads: 35
Posts: 829  
- Remember: "I write it right with all my might!"
Displayed posts: 677 / page 7 of 17
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 15, 2016

a very substantial upfront investment?

Alas, this is true, Major, especially if we used paid staff. Based on what I've been reading about establishing a peer-reviewed journal, it can cost between $10,000 and $12,000 minimum for administrative and editorial staff alone each year. The business model I'm envisioning, though, would not use paid staff but would rather rely on volunteers from the association's membership (I'm thinking you'd make a great member/volunteer, Major), at least until such a publication became profitable.

As I say, I'll take care of the formatting, editing and graphic arts for any type of publication, probably for the first year or two depending on article submission levels. The other expenses involved should be negligible but I haven't done much more research so I may be wrong of course. At any rate, if Joseph Normal Lockyear could found Nature in 1869 with the primitive and expensive publication resources available at that time, I'll bet we can do the same today with the Online Journal of the International Association of Freelance Academic Writers, or whatever.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 14, 2016

this forum is developing into such an association

I agree. According to EssayScam: "There are 4 featured and 30 regular writer profiles available." This many writers would make a good start. I'll work up some bylaws in case anyone is interested.

While I was hacking away at the bylaws for the envisioned International Association of Freelance Writers (IAFAW) (coming soon!) that one of the objectives of the association should be publish an online magazine or even a peer-reviewed journal. Association members and students alike could contribute articles on academic writing-related topics of their choice. The association could publish the articles online as they are received and then consolidate them into different issues according to general themes, a practice that has been shown to increase readership. Authors could remain anonymous if they prefer. At some point, it might be possible to sell advertising in the publication to help defray any minimal costs that are involved (I'll take care of the article formatting, editing and graphic art gratis, at least for awhile).

Establishing a professional association and publishing a journal or magazine might help lend some credibility to this industry that is sorely lacking at present. This idea may be completely misguided, but I think it has potential. If anyone's interested in joining such an association (membership will be free for founding members who will collectively approve the bylaws, membership fees/dues [if any], membership categories and qualifications, etc.), please email me through the EssayScam contact feature or you can find my email address in my ad on EssayChat.

While I was hacking away at the bylaws for the envisioned International Association of Freelance Writers (IAFAW)

* . . . it occurred to me that one of the objectives
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 13, 2016

Consarn it. These young whippersnappers and their new-fangled gadgetry. It's the devil's work and nuthin' good will come of it, I tells ya. (I tried this game and don't see what the fuss is all about.)
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 13, 2016

Relative frequency of negative themes in EssayScam.org



Some indication of the types of topics most frequently discussed in this forum can be discerned from a breakdown of the following search terms.

Debating StudentsScam 7,225
Cheat 1,564
Scammer 1,312
Crook 605
Steal 528
Sick 324
Stole 288
Con artist 192
Nasty 129
Thief 104
Thieves 97
Swindler 11

Whole lotta negativity goin' on...

The above results are completely skewed as well because I limited my search terms to these negative words. A search for more positive words shows a fairly equal balance:

Honest 2,390
Great 2,061
Legitimate 2,026
Professional 1567
High quality 649
Friendly 125
Reliable 547
Outstanding 49
Dependable 18

Of course, some of these statistics may be wrong because the term is taken out of context (e.g., ". . . he was not professional" or ". . . he was not reliable," etc.). It is also likely that many of these instances were due to spam which was subsequently identified and criticized for what it was by forum members.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 12, 2016

So you did write the article?

No, I meant I shouldn't have used it in my post.

Many years ago, I proposed a "national association of freelance academic writers" elsewhere in this forum, and I'm thinking an international association of freelance academic writers might be needed today for the same reasons identified in my original post. Membership would be free (or a modest cost) and would provide clients with some assurance that writers had been vetted by the association (the membership committee would consist of several association member volunteers). Membership criteria could be developed by an executive committee. The association could have an official "seal of approval" that writers could display on their web sites if they have them or a link to the association's (free) web site that explained what the seal meant if they don't.

I'm sure there are problems with this idea and that any such association could be exploited by unscrupulous writers but we need to start somewhere and this might be it. Other professions have professional associations and we should too. Any thoughts?
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 11, 2016

rabid badger

"Rabid badger" made me laugh. Dave Barry (my hero) uses this animal to good effect:

PROSECUTOR: Mr. Barry is badgering the witness!

ME (coolly): Your honor, as these documents clearly prove, Rex here is a wolverine.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 11, 2016

it's going to be hard to exceed six figures with most types of freelance writing.)

AND you have to go at it non-stop, full-tilt boogie to earn this much.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 11, 2016

I've seen many good forums destroyed by 'Likes' or 'Votes'.

Unfortunately, Major is absolutely right. As I recall, Silicon Valley's Jared Dunn recently used a so-called "click farm" to do this for Pied Piper's compression platform user rates. I was surprised to learn that these even exist. According to Maffin (2014), click farms pay workers in third world countries low wages to click on advertisements, "like" social media pages or otherwise drive up user activity rates. This may be hunky-dory for the spurious review sites identified by Writers2Beware and others in this forum (and the students who are gullible enough to fall for them), but it sure puts a damper on this idea for legitimate writers and essay companies.

Maffin, T. (2014, February). The 6 biggest mistakes people make with marketing on Facebook: Like any other marketing tool, Facebook requires input and engagement to be successful. Communication World, 31(2), 26-28.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 11, 2016

wild hand gestures

It wasn't easy, but I succeeded in communicating my need for an electrical fuse at 3:00 a.m. in rural Thailand to the compound security guard one eventful morning when our power went out using this method. While it was eventually effective, I'm sure they still tell stories about the crazy American acting out "electrical fuse" in the middle of the night using wild hand gestures, probably to scare their kids into behaving.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 11, 2016

There are plenty of non-academic freelance writers out there making a good living.

I responded to a post several years ago about this same issue. At the time, my research indicated that a minuscule percentage (maybe 5%) of non-academic freelance writers were able to earn a living. Granted, that means there are in fact still "plenty" of non-academic freelance writers making a good living, but there are far, far more who are struggling.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 10, 2016

In many cases, Americans simply talk louder in order to make themselves understood (this doesn't work btw). In the future, we'll likely see the emergence of a specialized English pidgin that will have its own dictionary and thesaurus.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 10, 2016

Most other industries, including academia ("RateMyProfessor) have some type of legitimate review sites available. Is this just an unfilled gap or are there so many ne'er-do-wells involved that it would be impractical?
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 10, 2016

brightest of the herd

Gary Larson would probably argue that this cow should receive that honor:

In reality, though, besides being delicious, most cows are smarter than most people believe. //off-topic links and quotes removed

These findings suggest that at some point in the foreseeable future, cows will be able to vaccinate themselves, grow their own feed and then turn themselves into steaks and Big Macs when the time comes. In fact, work is already underway to develop cow-tools for these purposes.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 10, 2016

building up a huge portfolio of work, usually completed for free.

Academicians are faced with this very same problem in their publish-or-perish climate. For-profit journals benefit from their free work year after year while the authors accept this unfair situation in hopes of accumulating a sufficient portfolio to allow them to charge for their work at some unknown point in the future. Except perhaps for show business and fashion modeling, few other professions require this type of sacrifice.

Over the past 20 years, I've reviewed countless books, Web sites and articles about how to make money as a freelance writer, and the rates paid by most customers in these cases are abysmally low, too low in fact to justify doing the work unless you're trying to build a customer base -- but who wants a base of low-paying customers? In other words, the non-academic work is out there, but 99% of it is on the level of Mechanical Turk.

p.s. re:

At the age of 32

I have problems older than that...
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

Is 2100 a guess

It's an "informed prediction" :-)

Us English speakers generally have it easy in terms of language

Interestingly, the [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_as_a_lingua_franca] Wikipedia entry for this topic ("English as lingua franca" or ELF) indicates the native English speakers may have problems communicating with non-native ELF speakers: "In ELF interactions, the importance lies on communication strategies other than nativeness, which can lead to communicative situations where those English native speakers who are not familiar with ELF and/or intercultural communication are at a disadvantage because they do not know how to use English appropriately in these situations."

This suggests that the meaning of American and English idioms that are commonly understood between native speakers will be partially or completely lost on non-native ELF speakers, with a corresponding increase in the number of opportunities for misunderstandings. In some cases, these will be hilarious: For instance, if an American male told a fellow male non-native ELF co-worker, "A little bird told me that you were the apple of someone's eye but you'd better jump on the bandwagon and make a pass at her or you'll be back to square one," it is likely that he would receive a blank stare.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

rely on word of mouth

You're right about that for sure. Probably one-third of my business over the years has come from referrals. Even here, though, many clients may be reluctant to divulge the fact that they have relied on these services and word-of-mouth only works with the closest and most trusted friends and colleagues, further limiting the potential pool of clients. Clearly, the industry is between a rock and a hard place on this one.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

you guys are proposing a standardized referencing method using Esperanto.

Yikes! I didn't mean to conflate these two issues (you may not, of course, be serious). Citations are trouble enough without adding this requirement. I believe the Esperanto example was used by steall1984 to illustrate the difficulties that are associated with developing a universal anything. There may be one area that achieves this lofty status by century's end though. While Esperanto may be a failed experiment, I believe that English will become the lingua franca of the entire business world by 2100. It's difficult to image how the Chinese can even compete with their current languages and keyboards.



There are other constraints to using Mandarin as a lingua franca. For instance, according to Steve Kaufman, "The Chinese government is promoting the teaching of Mandarin around the world, through its Confucius Institute network, in order to establish Chinese as the new international language. Yet the difficulty of writing Chinese characters, and the tonal nature of the language, make it unlikely the Chinese will become a preferred language of exchange for people who are not native speakers of Chinese."

Moreover, as of 2008, all airline pilots and air traffic controllers were required to use English only and other signs indicate that the use of English will become even more commonplace in the future, especially in the business world. Let's keep it for referencing too...
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

The following is your post above in Esperanto. I think I see why I didn't catch on either ...

Mi konsentas elkore . Por la kialo vi deklaras , ke ĝi neniam flugi tamen. Plie , la plimulto de provoj enkonduki ' universale akceptebla ' io malsukcesas. Rigardu Esperanton . Grandan ideon en principo , sed simple ne funkciis en realo . Evidente tio estas multe pli granda ideo ol sola referencanta stilo kvankam ; ) Sur flanka noto , Mi havas multajn amikojn kiuj estas universitataj profesoroj aŭ instruistoj , kaj ne unu el ili kontrolas citaĵojn . Do , mi meti vetas sur la propono ke multaj homoj ne eĉ ĝenas uzante la ĝustaj por ŝpari tempon . Kvankam , kiam mi estis en jurstudo , mi havis tre elektema profesoro pri familio leĝo kiu povus ofte esti trovita en la leĝo biblioteko kontrolanta hazarda citaĵoj , tial ĝi faras okazi.

I think I see why I didn't catch on either

How Freudian ... *it didn't catch on either

I think I see why I didn't catch on either

How Freudian ...

*it didn't catch on either
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

I completely agree that transparency in operations and open communications between essay companies, clients and writers are needed for a legitimate company, but your original post stated you were hired as a freelance writer to "provide help to the students on various topics" and there was no mention of Java programming (it may be that this is the focus of the Locus Rags site but I didn't bother to check). If a student failed because your code didn't work, that's an entirely different matter from a research paper that is graded subjectively. Not to put too sharp a point on this, but your original post made it clear that although you may be a stellar programmer, you are not a professional academic writer (at least in English) and all I'm saying is that your complaints about this company may be ill-founded.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 09, 2016

one source of traffic

I tried to "Ask Jeeves," but that didn't work. Billboards are probably out (although I've seriously considered them) and even cable television and radio are probably prohibitively expensive assuming you could find one that would accept advertising from our industry. Likewise, even Rolling Stone magazine is probably unavailable for this type of advertising now and the Goodyear blimp of course is right out.

Maybe a block party ...
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 08, 2016

I will advice the other freelancers to be aware of this and deal with them very carefully as at the end they may end up in eating always your heard earned money.

This made me smile at least. You mean, "They devise," "I will advise" and "hard-earned money," of course, and while it is unreasonable to link payment with the grade a student receives (it's virtually impossible to verify this), it is also unreasonable to expect any company to provide you with a client's phone number. The obvious mistakes above indicate that the problems you've experienced with this company may be based on factors other than those you cite.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 08, 2016

Good grief, this is an alarming trend because most students probably do what I do when I perform a Google search and just review the top matches (I thought Google was refusing paid ads for academic research and writing services). I'm wondering if rebranding our services as educational consultation or some such would be in our best interests at this point.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 08, 2016

I quickly transitioned from a page count to word count formula several years ago after receiving a few orders for 1.5 or single-spaced pages.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

I suppose the Ukrainian government has more pressing issues what with Putin rattling his sabers and all, but based on what you're saying above, it seems that there is nothing short of engaging in the same type of illegal practices that can help legitimate sites compete more effectively, but I'd hate to think that's the case. We should, at least, go down fighting.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

Ukrainian companies have been so aggressive in their SEO efforts

The essay industry has come a long way since we could only advertise in Rolling Stone but at least then we could describe precisely what we offer instead of trying to couch our services in sufficiently vague terms to pass Google muster.

I'm not even going to pretend to understand the current state of SEO, with my only experience being trying to optimize a Web site 10 years ago or so with little success. I'm wondering what the Ukrainians are doing that Western sites are not. I understand that Google penalizes sites for deceptive SEO tactics so it would seem to me that Ukrainian sites that didn't play by the rules would soon fall by the wayside. Clearly, this is not happening, though, which begs the question, "How can legitimate essay sites ramp up their SEO efforts to compete more effectively?"
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

Although I don't know the precise relationship between EssayScam and EssayChat (and don't want to), the friendly admin at EssayChat has been great whenever I've asked questions or made requests for several years now. They've even added some games (more games please!) and a survey feature at my suggestion. Although it is the Wild West version of EssayScam, I've had good results with my ads on EssayChat and I don't feel that the requirement to contribute to this forum on a regular basis to maintain this privilege is unreasonable.

Whatever algorithm is used to calculate points, I think it should be made clear to people who see these ratings that they are not based on client feedback but rather the frequency and relevance of postings in this forum only (I'll probably change my mind about this policy if/when I reach four stars).

At present, it seems I am Major General Verb, but I'm closing in on lieutenant general:



Interestingly, brigadier generals are so named because in times of war, they command a brigade. It is also noteworthy that even though the five-star general ranks in all branches of service were retired in 1981 following General of the Army Omar Bradley's death*, the U.S. Department of the Defense still keeps 268 sets of these insignia in stock "just in case."

____________________

*My mother-in-law met him when my father-in-law was assigned to Germany. She described him as "old."

I'm closing in on lieutenant general:

No need to salute, troops.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

I was missing something that other writers were doing

The simple (but ugly) answer might be that there are just more freelance academic writers now than there were a few years ago. This is not to say there are more good writers now, only that there may be far more of us.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

It is my understanding that recent changes in EssayScam policy require daily (or almost daily) postings by members who are regular freelance writers in order to maintain their ad-posting privileges at EssayChat.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 07, 2016

While I'm sure there's rhyme and reason to it, I'm still trying to figure out the rating system works.

The following is most information I've been able to find on this issue: "The EssayScam Rating / Popularity is a score (re-calculated every full hour) that ranks a forum member's participation in discussions. Posters who have high and regular level of engagement in relevant topics will accumulate a higher Rating score. Prolonged posting inactivity will reduce the Rating score."

The term "relevant topics," though, remains somewhat nebulous and subjective.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 06, 2016

Now we have members' ratings, and what's more?

While I'm sure there's rhyme and reason to it, I'm still trying to figure out the rating system works. The only place I usually advertise is EssayChat (the price is right!) so I want to keep these ads active and I will therefore contribute to this forum in any way I can. In some cases, though, I've seen my rating actually decline (modestly) after making a post. Is this some kind of automated techno-criticism? Likewise, although the word counts of posts may be included in the calculations, the number of words would not reflect anything about the quality of the content which would be subjective in any event. Anyone have a clue?


ProfessorVerb   
Jul 06, 2016

Anyone can help me how to retrieve the paper ID on turnitin.

I'm not certain this will help you, but the directions provided at TurnItIn state: "Click Go to assignment inbox to view the list of current student submissions, or click Submit another file to continue submitting as a student." In addition, the "Viewing Papers" feature might help: "Every text or image-based submission made to an assignment can be viewed online. To view a paper through the Turnitin website, simply click title of the paper in title column of the Assignment Inbox; this will open the paper in the Document Viewer." These features might give you the missing ID you need.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 05, 2016

Although he was criticized for it at the time, the use of humor (at least in the title) appears to have worked for Gamow since this study is still being discussed nearly 70 years later. According to Hauptman (2007), "George Gamow, a prominent physicist who led a parallel life as a cartoonist, light versifier, and author of children's books, evidently possessed an impish sense of humor" (p. 168). It was apparently this "impish sense of humor" that compelled Gamow to include Bethe's name just so the study could be called "the Alpher Bethe Gamow paper" which is also commonly referred to as "the alpha, beta, gamma paper" (Hauptman, 2007, p. 168). The Wikipedia entry for this paper indicates that another collaborator, R. C. Herman, "stubbornly refused to change his name to Delter." Now THAT would have been a knee-slapper.

___________________________

References

Hauptman, D. (2007, May). When I hear the word 'culture,' I reach for my pun! Word Ways, 40(2), 168-171.
ProfessorVerb   
Jul 04, 2016

Many academicians seem to be part of a stodgy group that lacks a sense of humor, especially when it comes to academic writing. For instance, according to Jacobs (2014), "For academics, scaling mountains of social research papers can be an exhausting, dry undertaking. The sober jargon and conceptual leaps often fall flat, and there's rarely an entertaining or revelatory moment in the long trajectory from thesis to conclusion."

Funny WritersThese observations suggest that academic papers are crying out for humor, but as Jacobs points out, "[W]hile humor is often seen as a useful variable for analysis, academics generally shy away from employing it in their own research. According to a new paper (aptly titled 'A Sociologist Walks Into a Bar...') in Sociology that puts up an epic argument for comedy's important role in social science [and that] sociologists that do wade into more amusing territory 'may find themselves dismissed as lightweight and trivial.'"

Indeed, a study by Sagi and Yechiam found that peer-reviewed journal articles that even had humorous titles were cited 30% less frequently than others: "Articles with highly amusing titles received fewer citations. The negative association between amusing titles and subsequent citations cannot be attributed to differences in the title length and pleasantness, number of authors, year of publication, and article type (regular article vs comment)."

Being a natural-born smartass, I've wanted to write something funny in research papers (when appropriate) as a freelance writer on many occasions but have largely resisted the temptation due to the above factors. When I was writing my own research papers in college, though, I'd use humor all the time to good effect but I knew my professors and they knew me so they weren't surprised and some of them even told me (albeit privately) how much they enjoyed reading them.

Moreover, all humans (even teachers == despite their stodgy reputation) appear to be hard-wired for humor. A study by Fry concluded that, "No person or group of persons has been found to be without a sense of humor, except on a temporary basis due to a dire personal or national tragedy which for the time being has caused an eclipse of humor. . . . This demonstrated ubiquity of humor is compatible with the contemporary view of how deeply humor is bred into human existence."

Certainly, there is no place for humor in academic papers about serious topics such as global warming, terrorism or abortion, but some topics readily lend themselves to humor. On the one hand, the temptation is real but the outcome remains uncertain in academia. On the other hand, there are always openings in Burbank..