Do they pay you as much as their "top" writers from Pakistan? Do you get $5.00 per 225 words posted in this forum? LOL!
This is the second time you have accused me of that and the nth time you have accused posters who post opinions and facts within their personal knowledge and an nth time to display your utter lack of 'matter up there.'
Such utter stupidity-'lay your predicate' first. Consult a lawyer-I am sure you do not know what that means.
Facts and opinions which work for the identified bashed sites and hurt your group's 'designed plan' --you try in vain to 'discredit' by maligning the character of the poster. For the intelligent readers-we call it something else.
One of the posters and message thread starter here posted a message to the effect that you should not write AGAIN for essaywriters. Then surprisingly-the message thread and the message posted were deleted.
What were you doing writing for essaywriters.net-to check their business practices, Amy resurrected? You are just one big filthy lie.
For the second time, I can excuse your SENILITY--I will reply to your question--I am not serving at the whim of anybody-and I am not being paid for posting my free and true thoughts. I wish I could say the same thing about you.
Why is it that you perceive that anyone who states true facts but in favor of the identified bashed sites-you readily boss them around, label them, ridicule them, maliciously impute that the poster is a shill for the bashed site? Such profanity . . .such lack of manners, such pathetic lack of good education, such lack of decency!
Readers are saturated and are sick already of your 'name calling' and the over run lines. Do this forum a favor!
FU.
Your mouth is like an infected wound-with pus oozing-and you stink like a rat at an advanced stage of decomposition.when you take the bait, you swallow the hook!
"Self-deception is nature; hypocrisy is art." The easiest person to deceive is oneself.
And I gotta tell you something about Latin--I didn't particularly care for it for the two years it was required in my Jesuit high school, and even less in law school.
Obfuscate is NOT 'to screw up' But 'to confuse.' As you have admitted you didn't pay attention when the rules of logical reasoning in Latin were taught-so it is not my fault that you are confused. . I was hoping you 'paid particular attention to the academics of it " before so that perhaps you would be able to understand what I was saying.
Simple logic.
By the way, you blew the answer.
I do not think so, do not assume. "The only ways of enquiry that lead to knowledge ... the one way assuming that being is and that it is impossible for it not to be, is the trustworthy path, for truth attends it. The Other, that non-being is and that it necessarily is, I call a wholly incredible course, since thou canst not recognize not-being ... nor couldst thou speak of it, for though and being are the same things."
-let me post the previous reply
You said,
"But, you will make my point for me. How? You will answer your own question--believe me, every good lawyer can do that. "
I replied:
"I do not agree with your second premise and therefore your conclusion, as well. Any good lawyer worthy of his profession does not make it easy for the opposing counsel by laying it 'on a silver platter.' ;-) "
It is parties in interest and not 'of.'
As we all know, "you can be a dog on the Internet"
Maybe not.
After reading your last two posts, I know how crucial it is for you to apply 'clarity'Here I am, pitching a ***** about essaywriters on a board they obviously monitor--or participate in, eh, Name of Pen?
"To uphold the honor and dignity of the legal profession . . . The lawyer's conduct toward other lawyers should be characterized by courtesy"
In retrospect, I was not talking to you. In your second post, you addressed me with your questions and your condescending sarcasm-I merely obliged to respond out of courtesy to the profession.
Borrowing your own words, you can
'screw up'everything I said, but what would that reduce you to? Like the few notorious posters here.
Auf Wiedersehen.
On withholding of writers' fees:I do not see it as a scam. There was no 'scam' in withholding of writers' fees. No deception-there was notice given by the company as early as 30 May that all the written work of all the writers will be subjected to quality verification-performance evaluation and appraisal. Writers whose work did not have 'issues to be resolved' were paid. Holding in abeyance subject to a period is different from forfeiture of the fees.
Forfeiture of fees due to an alleged violation of company policy, should it happen later on, may or may not be arbitrary. If a writer feels that the forfeiture of fees is arbitrary-then dispute and contest it. The company is merely implementing its policies. These written company policies are deemed to have been accepted by a writer who continues to write for the company. Writers must comply with it. There is no compulsion-if some writers are not agreeable with the policies-then do not write for the company-there is a de-activation button at the web page. Those writers who "copied and pasted, "I am sure your accounts have been terminated like Ps2? Ps, that is why you are so bitter and 'sour graping.'
nota bene: To those who sent emails-my gratitude for all the support! At least I know that the biased and negative remarks here are not a reflection of the larger and greater thinking audience. I shall no longer revisit this forum; some posts have been reduced into such a shameful tirade of sorts.
