Writers: What do you say?

WB: again, I don't debate cowards who won't lay their cards on the table. if you'd care to come clean, we can have a discussion. it might be fun-- maybe you'll try to cinch another argument using urbandictionary.com; maybe you'll use wikipedia this time. in any case, it's not going to happen unless you admit what most (including your new toady pheelyks) here already know: you work for ET.


it's nothing to throw a tantrum about. aren't you proud of your job? haha.


going by your number of posts, that's totally possible. but I wouldn't want to call the average customer in this industry a very good judge of my empiricism... would you?

Stop wasting forum space with your useless, cowardly posts. Here are the facts:

1. You have copied an ignorant accusation from previous morons, each of whom failed miserably in proving that accusation

2. I have directly challenged you to prove the accusation. You refuse to do so because you are a little b**-h who's not man enough or smart enough to back-up his claims.

3. I do not work for ET. If you want to continue your propaganda campaign by claiming otherwise, you should at least have the guts to state why it is-EXACTLY-that you have come to that ignorant position. Why is that so difficult for you?

In summary, you are an insignificant, petty being that can't prove its accusations

au contraire, mon frere.


the truth will set you free.

That's what I thought, fairy.

You missed the point entirely. You stated that WB's credibility has been eradicated by her posts. I pointed out that many people still find her (and me) to be very credible sources of information, while the same cannot be said for you. Your empirical abilities suck because you make statements that are clearly refuted by empirical facts.

very ladylike...


fact: WB works for ET. care to refute?

I have never seen anyone post any evidence supporting this assertion. I understand the inference, but this is specifically NOT an empirical fact because it is NOT something that can be demonstrated through direct observation--unless you're aware of something I'm not. And to pre-empt, please do not tell me it's up to me to "prove" that WB doesn't work for ET--that's called proving a negative and it's logically impossible We've been over this before.

You're also ignoring the fact that your previous assertion is plain wrong--I know you think that you "win" arguments by changing the subject whenever you can't even pretend to proceed in a logical manner anymore, but that really isn't the way it works for most people.

I don't position myself in this forum as any sort of provider of services. I was politely ignoring your point (at least you didn't accuse me of not reading it), but if you're going to call me on it, I'm going to call it what it is... moot.

Can you grasp the concept now, editor75 (aka, "Mr. Clueless")?


You have now proven yourself to be both an idiot AND a liar. The main reason why you joined this forum was to put forth some incredibly naive, unrealistic "ideas" for business owners. Obviously, you are-or at least believe that you are-a service provider. I'm not at all surprised that you can't find steady, high-paying work with one of the reputable companies in the industry. Cry me a river.

You do present yourself as a voice of "reason" capable of making objective judgments about others, and claiming that others are not trusted while implying that yourself are. The facts prove you wrong. You might think the fact that your arguments make no sense and aren't based in reality is moot, but I think it's pretty relevant.

well, thanks for chiming in again, pheelyks. here's fact #1-- I wasn't addressing you.

fact #2 (absolutely!)-- WB works for ET.

ergo, fact #3-- WB is a liar.

how's that logic? I don't see where your dog is in this fight, unless you're recognizing WB as your colleague, in which case, the dog would be you-- WB's lap-dog.

Moderator, this has gone on long enough. I have openly challenged this cretin to prove his accusation. He refuses to do so, yet continues to state as fact what is obviously his lame, propagandistic fascination. There's no sense in me or anyone else attempting to rationally debate with this nut. Therefore, I request that you take whatever action necessary to prevent him from posting the propaganda any longer. His comments have no basis in reality, serving only to poison the forum and mislead people who come here seeking reliable, truthful, verifiable information about essay scams, which I have provided since April of 2007.

the mod isn't going to help you, WB. try telling the truth.


they find the biased, subjective, half-crazy, and often racist assumptions of an ET propagandist.

shame on you.

Some of us just like things to make sense. like when you call assertions that have no empirical evidence "facts," it bugs me.

You've made it clear you can't hold up in a real argument, based on actual facts and adhering to the basic rules of logic and rationality. That makes continuing rather pointless.

don't let the door hit you on the way out.

How incredibly apropos

kel merde, comme de coutoume.

Droit!

Spelled incorrectly and useless. How surprising.

Lache-moi la grappe.

Incorrectly used. I don't speak French either, but at least I don't pretend....

pour vous, merde d'or.

Frère Jacques, frère Jacques,
Dormez-vous? Dormez-vous?

insults over what?

Editor75 - well & truly owned by pheelyks right there.

Discovering into this forum could quite possibly wind up being best thing I've done today, it's like reading through your everyday board's flame wars - only so much better. Perfect grammar on the comebacks, along with the incredulous extent to which some posters seem out of their depth, I've definitely had my share of entertainment for the day thanks to all of you.

All that aside, can anyone tell me what writing company your all referring to when talking about ET?? Seems like it's made the cut for legitimacy here, and I've been checking out different sites all day, but can't relate that acronym to any I've come across so far...

I know I know, don't bother pointing out those mistakes - I got to texting while posting that, IT HAPPENS.

Talk about lack of concentration.

I'm pretty sure the reason no one says ET's full name is because you're not supposed to.

hmm... well, admittedly, I don't speak French, but let's see who hasn't been 86ed from the forum, before we go making any (more) assumptions about ownership.

editor75 - little help unmasking ET for me, & possibly John's mom too? I'm still not old enough to get on the private threads, apparently. So over mail, maybe ;) ?

While I find this forum useful, I don't think anyone here wears their membership as a badge of pride.

Do you have something to do with running the forum? Are you one of the moderators?

ET is just a subsidiary, anyway. a more interesting question would be: who owns ET? a lot of people here already know; feel free to email them.

I know (at least I'm pretty sure) what ET stands for, but given that no one else here is saying it I somehow don't think it wise. Maybe it's something to do with the evident bitterness in long-time posters.

It refers to a fanciful image: a sort of small city, wherein the inhabitants would write various model academic papers for all the diligent university students in, presumably, the neighboring municipalities. Kind of like Santa's workshop, except for homework. (And their "Santa" uses a lot more profanity and makes a lot more demands for so-called evidence.)

No, I'm not one of them. I'm barely a day old myself! (I assume your question was directed @ me)

well, going by these responses, I'll just go ahead and drop the issue. Pretty sure as I browse through more & more threads I'll eventually figure out what its all about, soon enough.

I was actually asking editor75 based on a comment he made; you slipped yours in while I was typing, it looks like! :)

the moderators won't let non members see my posts; if I were one, I would change this.

so both WB & pheelyks got banned, huh? From what I've seen going through various threads today I'd figured them to be supermods or something close, but it seems I was wrong!

little person, big internet. or, in pheelyks' case... (it's times like these that I miss them)

It is obvious you have a strong dislike for these two, but why do you keep making these kind of references if they aren't even around anymore? Is there a point?

When they went in on a thread, it came ALIVE. A kind of mad, trolling genius. Like debating taken over the top, but still done with good prose. Not to mention the occasional battles on who would deliver the final, most impressive figure of speech - I've loved reading through these in particular, haha.

In any case, you'll all be glad to know that I've outed the mystical ET. Hurrah for me.

I wish the forum allowed members the freedom to recommend websites to budding writers like myself, however. At this rate it'll be months before I figure out where to try signing up (bad enough that I'm ESL AND Kenyan already, going by what I've seen on the threads so far).

they could barely spell. the only reason I rarely reference them is that I believe they are still reading.