I read that your mother is a street walker. Since I "read" it, it must be true. My condolences.

PS: Your site is garbage.

There is more than one type of fraud, you criminal. Plus, the copy on that smut site speaks volumes about the writing and comprehension abilities of EVERYONE associated with it.


There are no borders, either, for online criminals like you.

Sato = brand new member who signed up minutes after my initial comments solely to defend the dishonest site (essaysmaster.com) that he clearly represents

essaysmaster.com = scamming, ESL garbage from India

Narayanan, Abilash
techsoftweb@gmail
Essays Master
Narkala house Parakkala house
Kannur
Kannur, Kerala 682 036
India
+91.9605217475

Abilash Narayanan bought/acquired the domain on or around May 7, 2013. On or around May 11, 2013, he falsified the domain's Whois data:

Name: Josh Anderson
Organization: Essays Master
Street: 537 Hillhaven Drive Los Angeles, CA 90017
City: Los Angeles
State/Province:
Postal Code: B33 8TH
Country: United Kingdom
Phone: +7.87272513
Email: info@ssaysmaster.com

The clueless idiot from India left the state blank and used "United Kingdom" as the country for Los Angeles.

BTW, there is no "Hillhaven Drive" in the city of Los Angeles.

Any member who uses his/her signature to harass another member is the epitome of a stalker.

graphophobius' signature:

Um, no. I posted the evidence to prove your ignorance once, which more than suffices.


You're full of s-i*. You have NOTHING, coward. Once again, I implore you to "detail my misrepresentation of facts and interpretation." Why can't you do it? How about just a small taste?

It took virtually no effort to dispatch you. You're pathetic.

Your hypocrisy is off the charts. Your sole purpose of signing up here was to make false accusations against numerous members. Then, after they finally get pissed and demand that you provide evidence to support your claims (which you have failed to do, of course), you start taking the "victim" stance and using the "ad hominem" escape plan. Gee, I didn't see that coming at all. You are quite unique.


Congratulations on learning to use at least one site's search box. Your research skills are top notch. Why don't you post your sources, troll? Could it be that your sources include my rebuttals that completely defang the idiots' false accusations? Stuck between a rock and hard place, hah?

Yawn. Graphophobius is now competing with queen sheba for the position of "lead stalker."

LMAO! So what you are really saying, now, is that you were simultaneously and contradictorily claiming that the site both is and isn't fraudulent, depending on which way the wind happened to be blowing in relation to the argument that you were having with editor75. Gotcha. Thanks for playing.


Are you one of my parents or my 5th grade teacher? If not, you can go fu*- yourself.

You are either ignorant or intellectually dishonest. ONCE AGAIN, the students did conduct proper research; the term paper site's information/data was merely one of many research sources from which they quoted or consulted. Just because the term paper site source does not support your miserably failed argument that "all paper-buyers have dishonest intentions" does not mean that the term paper site is not a source of research. The students properly quoted/referenced the research papers that they purchased. They did not plagiarize. They did not inappropriately paraphrase. They did not attempt--in any way whatsoever--to hide their use of the term paper sites' material. Unlike you, they had no intention to be ethically bankrupt and intellectually dishonest.

I'm growing tired of whipping you. All of the evidence is on my side. Unless you can muster anything that's actually worthy of debate, stop wasting my time.

At this point, you are proving yourself to be both disingenuous and a liar.

As indicated in FEDERAL COURT records, 6 out of 7 students referenced in the BU case properly cited the term paper site in their bibliographies. Each student used his/her purchased paper exactly as he/she used all of the other research sources listed in his/her bibliography. The purchased papers WERE sources of legitimate research. Each student engaged in precisely ZERO plagiarism.

The more you deny, the more you expose your crookedness.


Well, that's because you are completely incompetent.


Oh, I'm sure that you have plenty os unique information. Tell me--am I supposed to be afraid or intimidated in some way. PLEASE post it. I can't wait.

1. Prior to your admission (after-the-fact) in this thread, when did you make that claim?

2. What other companies/sites that I have outed as scams do you assert are not scams?

Yeah, so this is at least the second time that you've been proven completely incorrect after making an uneducated claim. Again, why are you not still claiming that "all students who buy papers have dishonest intentions"? You were quite adamant about it on multiple occasions. What happened?


FU you. Post the slightest bit of evidence that I have EVER engaged in ANY type of scam. Here, I'll make it easy for you: userinfo&user=8409.


Only a scammer-at-heart could hold such a crooked position.


That is 100% correct. Graphophobius will apparently "say" just about anything to avoid having to admit that he is wrong for claiming that editor75 and I were incorrect about fast-essay.com.

Where's the company's proof? Funny, I don't see it anywhere on their site. Did you not read my previous post carefully?

Sorry, but people who have been here for a while know for a fact that your claim is false. Again, don't blame me because you are too incompetent to find the information with which you are obsessed.

By the way, why don't you address the fact that I have already exposed your ignorance multiple times? Seems to me that YOU are the one who's sidestepping.

What happened to graphophobius' repeated claim that "all students who buy papers have dishonest intentions"? Seems to me that HE is the one who's sidestepping.


You have ZERO credibility. You have done nothing but attack everyone from editor75, major, QS, and me since you arrived. You have also made incredibly inflammatory, blanket statements about the entire forum community. You are a world class piece of s-i*. Take a hike, troll.

I highly suggest that everyone stop humoring him. Just ignore him.

Cry me a river, pissy pants. I'm just more direct than you. I don't like to hit people from behind. You initiated the attacks with a seemingly endless stream of false accusations and ignorant assumptions about anyone and everyone. I looked the other way many times, but I just couldn't take your pompous bulls-i* any more. Clearly, I'm not alone in that regard.


You sure do like to "speak" for others when, so far, I don't recall a single member agreeing with you. You've attacked the full spectrum of members here, some with cause but most without.


First of all, he started it (just like you). Secondly, I no longer have a problem with him, and even when I did have a problem with him, it had absolutely NOTHING to do with his legitimacy as a writer. From what I recall, we hashed it out long ago. So, you can go f yourself, troublemaker.


Hook, line, and sinker . . . . To my knowledge, the only verifiable, substantiated data regarding the ratio of students who buy papers to cheat vs. students who buy papers for legitimate research and reference purposes comes to us from the ]Boston University vs. Term Paper Companies" lawsuit:

"One of the companies named in the suit, a N.J.-based firm called The Paper Store Enterprises, turned over a list of seven [7] BU students who bought papers there and a university investigation found that one of the students tried to pass the work off as his own. The other [6] buyers apparently used the papers properly, as research material."

eschoolnews.com/1999/02/01/internet-term-paper-mills-dodge-a-legal-bullet-from-bu-boston-university-loses-federal-suit-to-stop-term-paper-sales-to-lazy-students/

So, your ignorant, uneducated claim that "every student who buys a model paper is being less than honest" is verifiably false.


How incompetent are you, exactly? Is the search box still too complicated for you?


Ooooooooooooooooh, I see. You're the type of person who believes that one should get to know another before jumping to conclusions and posting false accusations about the other's intentions, values, skills, and integrity? Right. How irresponsible of me.

The "Internet" says otherwise. The domain was registered on 1997-10-06. The first record of a Web site hosted on that domain is from December 5, 1998. I can find nothing on their Web site that substantiates their claims of being in business for "over 42 years." The New Jersey Business Records Service [njportal.com/DOR/businessrecords/Maintenance.aspx] is currently undergoing maintenance, so I am unable to research their corporate records at this time.

You're full of s-i*, smartass. Post the proof. That should be no problem for you, considering that you claim to have seen multiple examples. Put up or shut up.


So, your position is that every, single customer who places an order hands in the paper for academic credit without citing the source? Any proof?


WRONG. I have very clearly and openly stated such on numerous occasions. Do you have a comprehension problem, are are you purely lazy?



You have far more experience trolling and being an irresponsible jackass, that's for damn sure. I was more than willing to be friendly with you, but you've proven to be a world class as*hole who's hellbent on treating everyone here like a villain. For you to pompously suggest that you are being "professional" in relation to anyone else's conduct is absurd. "Professionals" aren't too lazy to do some research and they don't make false accusations against others without having a shred of evidence.

I'm sorry, but now you're beginning to **** me off.

I do not post ANYTHING about a company/site that I can't prove. Like me or hate me, everyone who's been here for a while knows that. If you would bother to READ before making false accusations, you would know that, too. And don't give me the lame excuse that you "don't have time" or "can't be bothered" to read past posts or threads. If that's truly the case, stop being carelessly irresponsible by continually posting what amounts to complete horse s-i*.

YOU need to understand that I have been under constant attack since 2007 because of the evidence that I have posted here against various COMPANIES and SITES. You have absolutely no room (or experience) to judge how I handle that never-ending, monotonous onslaught on any given day.


Negative energy? I would type "FU," but I wouldn't want to be negative. As for "not admitting" why I am here, don't blame me because YOU are too lazy to do some reasearch in the forum. Sorry, but I won't repeat myself every time some smartass like you comes along. If the answer is so important to you, you can muster the ingenuity that it takes to use a search box.

I find it hard to believe that you are wasting your time trying to find out why I--in your uneducated opinion--am supposedly wasting my time.

There is no "fued." I exposed her fraudulent sites long ago, and she's had a mouth-breathing vendetta ever since. She is absolutely meaningless to me. I no longer initiate any interactions with her because she is literally insane. Look at her posting history, and you'll see that 95% of it is directly or indirectly foused on me. She is a stalker.


The "vitriol" comes my way because of the damning evidence that I post. Again, stop being so lazy and look at the many dozens of in-depth investigations that I have posted over the years under my two different usernames.

Everything that I post is POSITIVE in relation to the safety of innocent customers and Web masters around the world. Nothing else matters, including your "curiosity."


Your irresponsible, uneducated opinion is irrelevant.

I don't significantly bother with individual freelancers unless/until they get really out of control. I focus on fraudulent companies/sites.


You're no challenge, and it should be pretty clear at this point where you can put your intentions.

Graphophobius, I'd appreciate it if you would stop painting with such a wide brush. Thanks.

You are neither from Korea nor a professional writer. The manner in which you typed the quoted sentence is a dead giveaway as to your location, which I pretty much knew anyway. That you are a brazen liar comes with the territory, literally and figuratively.

Queen, let me give you a little hint: nobody gives a s-i* about you.

Mentally unstable morons like you find little sense in anything.

Indeed, "Ambitious." Don't let your painfully obvious lack of skill/standards/reasoning stand in your way. The world is your oyster.

Ever heard of an 80's horror movie called "C.H.U.D." (Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers)? Start there.

Check out how the joke (Hassan Almahdi) from fast-essay.com hires his "professional" writers: wanasoko.com%2Flisting%2F93449

Thanks to Google for auto-translating the Swahili gibberish.

fast-essay.com = dishonest, ESL garbage from Kenya

Domain: fast-essay.com
Name: OCHIENG RODGERS
Organization: FAST ESSAY
Street: 254
City: OYUGISS
State/Province: HOMA BAY
Postal Code: 00100
Country: KE
Phone: +254.0727639468
Email: OCHIOKEYROD@GMAIL.COM

Again, buttbag, responding to 3-year-old posts as if they were 1 day old calls out your psychosis better that I ever could.

But what about Antarch's goats?

Those poor, innocent goats . . . .

Please stab yourself. Thank you.

+1

Stop being so "racist"!

Apparently, one is "racist" only if issuing general warnings about Africans (more specifically, Nigerians). You're a painfully hypocritical J-A.

What kind of awkward nonsense is that, anyway? It's an "ESL special," that's for sure.


You are a clueless idiot. The debate starts and ends right there.


Good stuff.

That is absolute nonsense. Sorry.

Um, no, that would be your daddy.


As I explained to graphophobius the other day, that's the main problem with your kind.

For the sake of discussion, it would be great if you could present some proof.


We've already gone over this. Not a single, legit member of this forum has EVER made the claim that "all Nigerians are fraudulent." Work on your comprehension skills. You need to stop misappropriating YOUR confusion and misunderstanding as fact.

You've already proven that you are clueless in other areas, so you should probably stop assuming that your knowledge is a general indicator of reality.

Graphophobius, they're pretty much all the same. They seem to truly believe that their writing is flawless. Plus, lying is as natural to them as breathing.

Antarch has its panties in a bunch because I exposed its ESL inadequacies.

If you are an incompetent, ESL hack who can only get hired by foreign, ripoff outfits, you are correct.


OK, don't "reply his posts."

Thanks for putting your ESL mastery on record yet again.


Perhaps, you can start be sending out mass, indiscriminate emails offering a handsome percentage of your inheritance?

Indeed, they do, but I have never seen an American company/site do so.