Hey, where is your evidence that higher education DOES NOT contribute to intelligence?


Okay.

How? What was the argument? Isn't it about relationship of education with intelligence?

It is okay that you side with pheelyks, but why distorting the argument?

Schooling is a part of education. Don't know why you do not believe so. That was the title of the article. I wonder you did not read the title, how did you read the content?


Okay. Now you start insulting me for writing skills. You mean education does not affect intelligence but language skills do? LOL!

I think both have their own importance. Believe it or not, a person's behavior and development are influenced by both his/her innate abilities and environmental factors.

You have a long way to go pheeleaks. You did not read the articles, and just rejected to save your face. ;)

You have to first understand the words: Intelligence, education, learning, and knowledge. You can come back and start fighting again, but first you need to get to that level. I can't believe you if you say you know these words and their contexts of use. You have to prove it...quite a hard job, I know.


I was not doing so, I think. The issue is the same, which you can understand if you read my posts.

Did you get it, pheeleaks?

Hahahaha. This is what you say when someone provides EVIDENCE, and you instead of providing your own reject it. I think you have a big problem. Would you like to consult a psychiatrist?

It means the point is debatable. So your "No" reflects your ignorance.


Did you read the article? I don't think so. Or maybe you did not understand what is written in the article. Reading and Comprehension problem? Can't help it then.

Are you saying that higher education and schooling have nothing to do with each other? I wonder why you wasted time in school. wouldn't you have gone to university directly? Hmm..

Lol! I stated:


To make it clear for you, what I meant is education does not make one intelligent, but has impact on one's intelligence.

ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v2n4/GUSTAF/PAPER.PDF - "certain schooling experiences may cause improvements both in general cognitive ability, and in specific abilities"

usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/mentalhealth/story/2011-12-27/IQ-isnt-fixed-at-birth-and-can-increase-with-educ ation/52237552/1 - IQ isn't fixed at birth, can increase with education

By the way, you are both uneducated and unintelligent, and you have a "big a%s" to be kicked. Thanks for proving it!


Huh?
Here is the definition: dictionary.reference.com/browse/intelligence

Just because you say so? Accepting the fact would make you look like a duffer? You are uneducated implies that you are unintelligent, right?


A big no. I am kicking your ass.

Thumbs up!

Education definitely has impact on one's intelligence. Although the latter one is not derived from the former, but education makes one more knowledgeable. Without knowledge, how can one even think to talk on a particular topic? Education not only influences and enhances one's cognitive abilities, but also induces one's personal development. A master's student knows how much he is different from the one enrolled in a bachelor's program. How does studying authentically and professionally for 2 to 3 years more after accomplishing a bachelor's degree not affect a person's capabilities? Secondly, self-study is way different from getting tutored. I believe writing academic papers is more of a self-study. It influences one's talents through practice but writing after getting properly educated is better and more efficient.

PS: Not to forget mentioning that education does not mean acquiring a degree. I am talking in the context of getting educated by achieving knowledge, which ultimately leaves you with a recognizable degree. Pheelyks, at times, insists that degrees are important in choosing a career as an academic writer, and then contradicts his own statements by stating it does not matter at all, when he is pointed out as a poorly educated jug-head.

If LazyCo's advertised for any other writing company, he would be a moronic spammer, and no one else but a company representative. Lol!

Do you have any degree? I think, no!

I am waiting for the evidence~~~

Lol! Good one.

It doesn't mean that.


You are quite stupid, I guess. Don't you know about CFA certification? I am doing CFA in Michigan, and they recognized my Bachelor's degree. Of course, they loved 3.75 CGPA. Isn't it a good news? I think you need some study on that.


Calm down, pheelyk. I am neither stupid nor a liar. You may be called by those names anyway.

You thought I might not have a higher education degree, and others think you are not able to write on different topics on higher academic level with two useless English degrees. I think you shouldn't have any problem accepting the fact.

Why are you getting angry now?

Guess what, pheelyks was trying to insult me for not having a higher education DEGREE.


Proposed requirement for complaints: ORDER NUMBER

By the way, I have a 4-year Bachelor's degree, and have qualified CFA level I and II. This year I will complete level III. I think you will remain poorly educated and unintelligent as always.

If you received it before your deadline, what is the problem now? According to the company's TOS, you can't turn it in the paper, I understand, but, in that case, you should have ordered the paper at least a week before your deadline. Still, someone took your order up and completed it before your deadline.

Another point is: the company should not take the order that its writers cannot complete within the specified deadline.

How did you pay them? Through Paypal? Credit card?

Start a chargeback with that company. Simple!

Cancel your order asap. You will get s-i* otherwise.

Actually, I am a human, but you are a J-A. You have been inconsistent in your arguments throughout the debate. For the evidence, refer to your stupid arguments again. The logic and validity of my arguments is clearly shown by the fact that many people agreed to my opinions, and you...still alone and looking like an ass clown. You have kept ignoring my points for you have no logical argument to present. I pity you, EFL crackpot. Are you really not able to understand American laws (even though they are written in English language.)? Maybe your language skills are at the level of "countless ESL writers" who barely speak English. Lol!

Can't you read? I mean, really?


This is true!


This is also true! (them = students)


You keep ignoring this because you lose here, ignorant fool.

As for your stupid "reasonably should not have known" thing:



Period.

F?*k off, WB. You have lost the debate.

Your quoted text is in no way a counter argument to my post. Can you not read the word ghost writing? Is that only a company research, too?

You are a stupid American **** who is not able to interpret American law. You are ignorant.

Absolutely. Lol!

Silly. No company will be convicted. You associate this factor with copyright transfers, but not with your silly "courtesy period" concept. Companies will never be called in courts when they transfer copyrights, because even if students submit papers bought from them, schools will not institute legal proceedings against them. This is what I meant by providing the concepts of plagiarism. Submitting others' work is plagiarism, not necessarily copyright infringement.

I think I should have started the debate by providing the legal interpretation of copyright. Copyright is basically the right to copy, edit, modify, improve, etc., (plus the right to prevent the reselling of) the thing the customer has bought the copyright of. I provided the explanation of moral rights to make you understand that copyright transfer does not indicate the transfer of authorship. Similarly, the companies having the copyrights of the papers do not own the authorship, which is quite clear by the fact that companies resell the papers under the name of the original writer. You don't understand it does not mean judges don't know it. To make it more clear let's consider this: The customer of a beer does not own the copyright, but the right to USE the product as he/she wants.

Actually your "reasonably should have known" concept applies to ghostwriting where the writer is transferring the authorship to the customer, BUT ghostwriting is not considered as illegal (but unethical) because the original author has right to transfer ANY rights to the customer. The main point is: Copyright is not ALL Rights. Got it now?


I missed a point here. Ghostwriting is not illegal for many works but academic works, by the way. To understand, consider the same "reasonably should not have known" aspect of law. This is how the law works.

Now, shut up, WB!

Huh? I think you are facing THE comprehension problem, and you saying so means you want me to explain it to you over and over again. Please get enrolled in a school, or, maybe you should contact a psychiatrist. ;)

WB, you are actually mixing the definitions of copyright and plagiarism. Would you mind to be "schooled"?

plagiarism checker/plagiarism-vs-copyright.php

"Plagiarism doesn't have to include copyright infringement. For example, William Shakespeare's plays are not copyrighted because they're too old. Even though it would technically be legal to copy from one of those plays for an English assignment, it would still be plagiarism if you didn't give credit to Shakespeare. Your teacher may not be able to take you to court over it, but she can certainly give you an F. You might even get suspended or expelled from school. Even though copying one sentence from a Web site is legal according to United States copyright laws, that may still count as plagiarism in your teacher's book."

I think you are not familiar with what is called "moral rights". Read it.

[tmweb.com/copyright.asp] Moral Rights

Even if an owner sells his copyright to someone else, he still retains what are called "moral rights". This means that no one, including the person who owns the copyright, is allowed to distort, mutilate or otherwise modify your work in any way that is prejudicial to your honour or reputation. Your name must also be associated with the work as its author, if reasonable in the circumstances. In addition, your work may not be used in association with a product, service, cause or institution in a way that is prejudicial to your honour or reputation without your permission."

What you explained is just bulls-i*, and I have no interest in reading that.

What does the "courtesy period" do? Judges are not stupid as you, I guess.

This should be for your own self, WB.



I think this can best address pheeleaks' idiotic concern that companies do not go to school. Lol!

Why not all? Every writing company in the industry is giving that so-called courtesy to its customers.


Actually both are similar issues, but different in one aspect. Both the situations let students commit academic frauds, and by not transferring the copyrights, companies can avail the opportunities of more profits from resale of the papers in future.

This is not true in any case. Companies definitely know that the customer is going to submit their papers, which is why they give them a period of six months (why not a week or two?) before reselling the paper. The terms and conditions mentioned on their websites are just to pretend that they are abiding by law (education). A perfect paper would not be assured by the companies, if they don't know the papers are intentionally bought for submission.

People who are against students who submit others' works under their names must acknowledge that ghostwriting is illegal, too.

Why do you use iPad, in the first place? I doubt you really have it. Maybe you imagine using iPad in Egyptian slum. If you are really rich, why don't you pay your writers?

You are getting the best scamming and spamming here. LMAO!

Yes. I am living in Detroit. Do whatever you want. Scammer don't have a right to threat others.


I know. Maybe around $30. Good Luck!

Oh! Googling... Lol! Go ahead. You can't get me. I challenge you.


So basically, this is why she calls herself halo - you know, a deluxe apartment in the sky. Wow!

Oh! Now I know why you have offered "iPads" to your writers.


iPads run on electricity? I wonder how long your wire is, may be from Egyptian slum to NYC. If this is not the case, I think iPads can be charged in few hours when the electricity is available. :)

Really? You must not be in senses!


You think your arguing with me is on-topic? LMAO!

Well said!

Height of self-praise! I think it should be turned to self-mortification.