:D I can help you with a website.

Indeed it is and so is arrogance.

You could do the same and when asked for evidence make silly excuses, "I will not waste my time."
I just shared my opinion once on this forum, and admitted that it was my opinion. I have no proof to support it. I don't even say it any more. You just keep accusing me of being an incompetent writer without giving any factual evidence.

Should I pay you .25 cents per word to give evidence to support your baseless accusations against me?

EW_writer: I did not. She did it herself.

WB: I am really sorry. Please forgive me :D

LOL
I was offended at that baseless accusation. You only made fun of yourself by pointing out that one can not get offended at things.

When there is an argument it is better to quote a third party that is neutral.
I wish you had Googled before telling me that I could not get offended at something.


Why wrongly? Source?
Don't want to waste time?
Oh yea you won't get paid for it.

I have given you the source that explains the usage of 'offend' with different prepositions. You may be a native speaker, you are definitively not an authority on English Linguistics.

Offended by - has a notion of getting annoyed.
Offended at - has a notion of displeasure.

You can get offended at things. There is nothing wrong in it. It was absolutely correct in the sense I used.

"I suggest that we cease this useless spat."

You have the time to do this?

There is nothing wrong with "Offended at". You have the guts to argue back when you are totally wrong and have no evidence to support your claim.

WB you are not good at this. Investigate frauds!
Age qoud agis!

joneszr could you message me the details?

Swine did you get my message?

WB

FYI There is a subtle difference between the usage of 'offended at' and 'offended by'. I do not have the time to teach you English, you may refer to page 107 of "The Correct Preposition - How to Use It a Complete Alphabetic List" By Josephine Truck Baker

Published by READ BOOKS, 2008 ISBN 1443729671, 9781443729673

Limited preview of the book is also available at Google Books.

Since you have simply failed to list even a single common mistake by native speakers of Urdu/Hindi. Here are a few:

1) Confusion between the usage of have/has, which/that, like/such as, and so on.
2) Using past tense verb with did.

It is very likely that native speakers of other languages may also make to these mistakes.

If you choose a website, read the terms and conditions twice. Most companies resell/reuse papers.

I am offended at this baseless accusation.

WritersBeware:
I was able to immediately recognize the ESL nature of your writing; specifically, your writing includes mistakes that are common to native speakers of Hindi and Urdu.

Even if you said this based on your experience, the statement is not backed by facts. You have failed to list even a single IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZABLE mistake that is made by native speakers of Urdu/Hindi. You have wasted days because you simply do not know and Google would not help you. It only takes a few seconds to list an IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZABLE mistake from ones experience.


True. I am not a news caster. I have no pronunciation problems I can communicate well.

One in 5 American's do not speak English at home. It is a fact. I never said you claimed such a thing.
I can academically and legally challenge you that my writing skills are better than many native speakers of English.

Even the legit companies do not ask what language one speaks at home. They only look at the writing skills and verify location. I can bet there must be writers working with legit companies who do not speak English as their first language. Every person who does not speak English as first language DOES NOT necessarily write garbage or anything academically inferior.

I only ask you to let everyone know one such mistake, if not few. I am not asking you to point out in my posts. The reason I am so confidently asking you to bring evidence is because there is no credible study in my knowledge that deals with the subject. So you must have made that statement on the basis of your experience.

The point is you made false accusations against me too. I did not challenge your statement about my nationality. I challenge your statement that I make IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZABLE mistakes that are common to people from this region. You also without any proof claim that I am a native speaker Urdu/Hindi. It is dumb to assume that every American speaks and writes English as first language when a sizable population of the United States does not even understand functional English.

So did they give you the order details?

They should have already deleted all information related to the order. I believe they do not falsely advertise that, "We delete all order information after emailing our product to the customer."


Legally yes. Slander was not appropriate there.

You did not provide any proof! You just made a sweeping statement based on the limited knowledge that you have regarding my person, which I myself provided.

I am still waiting for a single IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZABLE mistake that speakers of Hindi/Urdu make.

And they reuse/resell papers as well. Read the terms and conditions twice before you order.

Start working on it yourself. If you need help feel free to ask me here, or through pm.

The fact remains. You were simply unable to back your statement with any sort of evidence.
This following statement was slander. If you think otherwise please provide evidence.

"Privacy Policy

We do not save or store customer information.

We delete all order information after emailing our product to the customer."


I never claimed such a thing.

Had I not disclosed my location and nationality, there was absolutely no way for you to find out.


You can immediately recognize (LOL) so there is no need to search and waste time. I would give you more space. Just list the common writing mistakes that an ESL writer of Pakistani decent would make. You would be wasting time only if you try to find those mistakes in my posts, If in the first place you are able to list those immediately recognizable mistakes.

You need to decide which paper has problems. In one post you said the first and second have no problem and in another you said the second and third have no problem.


[qoute=WritersBeware]The first paper is very questionable. However, there are no significant problems whatsoever with the second and third papers. You need to get your false accusations in check.[/quote]
The facts are:
1)The 2nd papers lacks a a list of references at the end. There are references to Poetics and Republic in the text. There should have been full citations at the end.

2)As claimed by the customer 4 sources were requested.
3) I confirmed if the he/she forgot to paste the references here and here is the response.

WB you may have always been right but you just lost here. Now stop whining and move on!

3) I confirmed if the he/she forgot to paste the references and here is the response.
humble:
(made a typo :P)

can u list those common mistakes


Take your time and find out what such common mistakes are. Then point out wherever you find them in my posts. Let every one see your 'fact based evidence'.

Happy Hunting!

You have a comprehension problem there. I did not learn English as a second language. And you were wrong because I grew up with British English and not Pakistani.

The second paper is without citations. A paper that does not give credit or lacks proper citations is plagiarized be it intentional or unintentional.

Do you have his phone number?
How did you pay him?

Jeffery,
Personal and legitimate uses only

The Google SOAP Search API service is made available to you for your personal, non-commercial use only (at home or at work). You may only create a single account and must provide accurate identification, contact, and other information required as part of the registration process. You may not create any script or other automated tool that attempts to create multiple Google Google SOAP Search API accounts. And you may not use the search results provided by the Google SOAP Search API service with an existing product or service that competes with products or services offered by Google.

(code.google.com/apis/soapsearch/api_terms.html)

I once used such an application and frequently came across the following warning:

"Google Error We're sorry...but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.

We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been infected, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that your systems are free of viruses and other spurious software.

If you're continually receiving this error, you may be able to resolve the problem by deleting your Google cookie and revisiting Google. For browser-specific instructions, please consult your browser's online support center.

If your entire network is affected, more information is available in the Google Web Search Help Center.
We apologize for the inconvenience, and hope we'll see you again on Google."

You know what whenever something comes up that hints at a possible relationship between you and SRE or its affiliates, you overreact.


I just questioned your logic. I was not taught an ESL form of English. I also graduated from an American university. My works have been excepted by American and British clients. I am not here to promote myself or any organization that I work for.

Why do you have an issue if someone has a negative opinion about a certain company? or if someone violates Copyrights.

Time to hit the bed you can get back to work in the morning :)

I attended a school that has British English as medium of instruction.


May be you work for SRE and your primary job is to create this USP (Legit American) for College Editor. This is because they have loaded terms. They can resell the papers, they will retain the copyrights, the purchaser has to delete the paper. The purchaser can only read and cite the paper if any part of it is used in any form. May be CP is owned by SRE or is an affiliate of SRE so you could defend them as well.

There is a probability! and there definitely is.

Guesswork!
What made you wonder I was taught an ESL form of English?

And that expression is poor :D

It is obvious that you are paid by someone to promote and defend College Editor here.

If you do not agree with any of our terms and conditions, or intend to commit any form of academic fraud by not properly citing our service as a reference, you may NOT do business with our company.

5. Copyright Notice: All Materials are protected by copyright law and by international treaties. Aside from a reasonable number of copies for personal use, you may not otherwise reproduce, distribute, publicly perform, publicly display, or create derivative works of this material, unless authorized by Custom College Editor and/or its affiliates/partners.

Is there a legit company that would actually sell the material with copyrights?

Sparks post more details about the outlines I will help you.

A bad expression does not mean it is grammatically incorrect.

I will ask one of my linguist friends to comment on it :)

Dissay do it yourself. Yahoo answers is a good place, very helping people.

Major my eyes are hurting so I cant read all of them. Just a quick skim revealed several instances of poor usage, poor sentence structure and grammatical errors.

"Philosophy is built on disagreement and the careful and skeptical analysis of other viewpoints, and most of civilization's greatest philosophers find themselves in disagreement with other leading thinkers quite often, if not absolutely every time they advance a theory."

this is from the middle one. It is an example of pathetic expression. Too many points squeezed into one sentence. This is definitely not by a native speaker. Well it could be.

LOL

Don't worry I took prints of the web page before it was censored :D

Philosophy is built on disagreement and the careful and skeptical analysis of other viewpoints, and most of civilization's greatest philosophers find themselves in disagreement with other leading thinkers quite often, if not absolutely every time they advance a theory.

Philosophy indeed! :D

Korrupshun: The writer could be a native speaker and may be made these mistakes in a rush. Writers are prone to mistakes that is why proofreaders exist. Nevertheless, the paper is of poor quality. But you can not do anything. You agree to get screwed. A fraudulent company would do that without telling you, however a legit company would take your consent first.

LMAO

hmmm the middle one has no citations at the end? did you forget to paste here or was it sent to you without citations?

:D that is so subtle.

Sparks I am not good at Chemistry. I will help you with outlines. Post more details about the requirements.

It would create a mess and then we would need a message board for those who would get scammed by some crooks on this forum :D

I understood your analogy. Was just trying to clarify that legit companies can also do fraud.
:D and I know it hurts

YES I am 100% sure about the information I provided. The company still exists because it is undergoing liquidation. The name is now Enron Creditors Recovery Corp.

It is American and was found guilty not by me but by a court. And the audit firm that was partner in the fraudulent activities is also American. I am not aware of its present status but heard it was bought by some other entity.

yes :D

Reason: It usually takes about a few hours for regular members to respond. And if someone asks about a random service provider the chances of a loyal customer finding this thread somehow, joining the forum and posting a positive experience are extremely low. (I wonder if a post is indexed on Google in an hour).

Make it look realistic post and then wait for a day or a week before responding :D

Enron is not like Ukranian fraudsters. Enron was and still is a legitimate American company that was found guilty of fraud and deception. It was listed at NYSE.

"Enron is an energy company based in Houston, Texas that deals with the energy trade on an international and domestic basis. It was formed in 1985 when Houston Natural Gas merged with InterNorth. After several years of international and domestic expansion involving complicated deals and contracts, Enron was billions of dollars into debt. All of this debt was concealed from shareholders through partnerships with other companies, fraudulent accounting, and illegal loans. Listed below are a few of the partnerships that allowed Enron to hide debt:" (LawyerShop)