Ed75 here. Here's what's up:

#1 I'm not lacking in smarts and creativity-- that's your department. You're stuck being a scumbag for dumb-asses, and it's been just about your whole life now, so who was smart enough to get out and make some real money for half the work? Me. You couldn't even pass a bar exam.

#2 I wasn't FractureGang. Swing and a miss, mlm.

#3 Cite is falling in love with you.

#4 Three's a crowd, so I'll just set the record straight and let you couple of losers keep stinking up this dead website.

Later, chief! Have fun in the Fortress of Solitude!

I enjoy fiction as much as the next guy, and when it's about me, it's even better. I don't even care who writes it. A fizzled bureaucrat with a 90 IQ? Fine. It's great to get the attention; it's nice to be noticed.

Speaking of, one thing I remember from psych 101 is that people often project their insecurities onto others, and then overcompensate in doing so. Aren't people funny? If I got to the 200 level, I'd be able to explain it better.

Imagine that you're insecure about no one ever noticing the hacky, repetitive, run-on-riddled drivel you're advertising here as if it were gold. You might not ever even get to sign your work with your real name, or see any of the grades you get (maybe that's a good thing). And you need to feel important. So it makes sense that you start pretending that people who couldn't give two ***** about you are stalking you. I'm not sure, but I think that condition might be called delusional paranoia.

But it's not all bad news. I have correctly, I believe, diagnosed myself as having neither a split personality nor amnesia. So, you may rest assured that I am not LawEssay, who, while they make some good points, has their own insecurity issues on display about a certain well-weathered bogeyman, the Yank. This is a chip that I don't have on my shoulder. In fact, I root for the Yanks every spring.

Jeez, your sleuthing skills are the pits, counselor. You should probably stick to hack-work.

It must be embarrassing being confronted with the truth that more than one person can see through his fatuous twaddle.

CIte/noted is judging writing companies based on nationality, and yet still has not provided any clue about

1. Their interest in the industry
2. Where they hail from
3. Where they operate (if anywhere)

And dumbass meathead FW, seeing only an advertising opportunity (and/or possibly also into nationalist stereotyping) jumps on the pile. It's a shameful display.

As to why 2 fouls have not been called-- these are the site's ref's favorite players, and the sandbox's only two current mega-shitposters! How dare anyone join to call them on their BS>

One of the reasons I really want Cite to post this Martin Luther essay is that I wrote a similar one a few years ago (at least from what I can gather from the somewhat incoherent explanation above), and I think he might have been the customer. Cite? You there, buddy?

That was literally five pages with subheadings. Aren't you supposed to be charging premium for that during busy season? And here it is, pro bono.

Well, you must have a soft spot for charlatans. It is busy season, isn't it? My memory is a little fuzzy.

Thanks for the response, but that's some mamby-pamby nonsense up there, Cite, and you know it. Have you come across the idiom "Put up or shut up?" It's time!

This kind of policy is usually favored by overseas scam companies that keep their writers in fealty through QAD fines. They are generally run poorly by criminal charlatans, and produce nothing of value. Kind of like Cite's litany of vague posts, unproven assertions, and insider poses.

I was so inspired by the free 5-page sample FW gave you in another thread, Cite, so here's a little free edit. Your English has improved a lot, so it was mostly just brushing up ("polishing" lol) things like prepositions, S-V agreement, awkward language, compound noun spellings, W/C, etc. etc.

Each bag of garbage that a sanitation worker throws away, regardless of weight and size, should be considered a great accomplishment on their part. It is no easy feat for the sanitation worker to pick up random bags of garbage while also trying to keep moving towards the next collection stop. There are days when these time-sensitive deadlines overlap, but one still manages to remove the unsightly trash as expected for every client on one's list. The greatest project of a sanitation worker, in my heartfelt but nonetheless mamby-pamby and unsolicited opinion, is how s/he has evolved from an amateur afraid of leaky garbage bags to a highly-trained, well-versed professional who sees a bunch of disgusting trash and remains completely unfazed. Rather, s/he sees every bag of garbage as a challenge to be overcome. The greatest project is the highly-polished and well-honed set of skills that the sanitation worker has developed over his/her years of constant, careless, fumbling, anonymous dreck-handling. All of the bags of garbage s/he has handled from the beginning of their career to the present are this sanitation hero's greatest projects. One is neither more important nor more notable than another!

Ah, the internet. Is "delusions of sock-puppets" a symptom of anything besides stupidity? Too much free time, maybe?

I distantly remember the end of busy season, as I sit here sipping martinis standing out of the sunroof of my Benzo, rolling slow down the Vegas Strip, making it rain on every corner. I remember writing 25 pages a day and being too exhausted to type another single word, much less a poorly-worded pamphlet on ES. A toast to you, sir!

This is one example of ESL English sounding different from that of a native speaker. A native speaker has a few choices here, but "This is a factual truth" isn't one of them.

1. This is a fact.
2. This is the truth.
3. This is factual.
4. This is truthful.

Bonus proverb: "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones."