In response to your last post on the other thread, I thank you on behalf of all the countries which the US Armed Forces protected from countless dangers throughout the twentieth (and now the 21st) century. Were it not for the US, the world would have been a very different place. Think of WWI and II, Vietnam, Korea, the war against the Axis of Evil (terrorism), etc ... You guys played a major role in keeping my country (UK) a democracy and a nation to be proud of, not to mention your liberation of France.

We owe you, Verb, as we do every member of the US Armed Forces.

Sorry, Verb, the evidence speaks for itself.

As for you, Essay99, I am not talking about MY system. Let's get that straight. Before you venture an opinion, I suggest that you do the following:

1) open an ACAdemon account
2) upload a paper for reselling and leave your first name initial and your last name. See if they leave it as is, or not.

Simple: try it yourself.

Yes, maybe madpapers needs a better editing system but since I am not affiliated with them, can't say. Am speaking on the basis of my very long-term knowledge of the industry.

Why are we even arguing about this amongst ourselves. I think we need to argue the issue with Google - you know - conspiracy against Verb and all that.

Affiliates always remove our names, unless you somehow game the system. You have been around for a long time and know that.

I'm finding it hard to believe that any desperate for FW's endorsements and online support is any different from him. You say you are honest. Okay? But don't birds of a feather flock together?

As such, and until proven otherwise, my comments on post 41 remain as is.

The OP's initial expressions of extreme apprehension, followed by a near-defeaning ringing endorsement of Verb's services reminds one of Charles' client fishing strategies. Remember when he used to pose as somewhat apprehensive Freelancewriter client, only to sing his praises a few posts later? Back in the day when some thought he had integrity, the strategy worked. Unfortunately for Charles/FW, the mods exposed the 'satisfied' clients as none other than Mr Integrity - Charles, aka Freelancewriter.

Question: if you are the most sought-after writer at SNR and have countless private clients (you once wrote that you were booked 2 months in advance), why are you busy angling for clients here (your signature) and on every page of essaychat? "Something's rotten in the state of Denmark," as the great bard would have undoubtedly remarked.

Verbiage: Post #41 is exactly that - verbiage, verbal garbage. As the majority who use these services know (after signing away copyright and all), these affiliates never affix our names or email addys to the Abstract or any part of the paper. ACAdemon, one of the affiliates of the company you say you work for, does not even affix our handle to any part of the papers uploaded, let alone the Abstract. Try another LOGICAL and semi-BELIEVABLE explanation, please.

Again, keep your $250.00.

Please feel free to expose my sites and, more importantly, establish me as a scammer. We have processed over 3,500 papers til now and have only had 4 customers complaints here; one of whom backed down and admitted that she was not scammed. As regards writers, 5 complaints out of a total of 374 writers. I made my position very clear:

1) we do not pay for copy and paste work
2) we do not pay for papers which do not make a modicum of sense
3) as I wrote a zillion times, any who were not paid, or fired because of the quality of their work, may post their unpaid for papers here and allow the forum members to arbitrate between us.

Melissa/Matt: I am too busy to shoot down every rumour you try to propagate. Hence, feel free to say what you will.

PV - both when serious and joking, you are one of a kind :) more posts pls.

Based in Latvia.

You even incited the disgust of a new forum member; one who has brains and is worth a zillion of you.

Thanks for your post, Jess Tesla.

Sheeba is a female :( 20+ usernames to date as she keeps getting booted out.

I guess we are clear now about you feel about hacking and stealing copyrighted material.

Your world must be a very interesting place.

The forum is incorrectly attributing quotes to the innocent, again :(

WB's quote are taken from the sick ramblings of the resident psycho's posts.

Seriously, how can Psycho even claim to know how to hijack into a .gov website, let alone White House's emails? Are we supposed to read this as the criminal's confessions?

Mods: Someone here is getting very excited as the date draws near, and can't seem to keep a lid on it, repercussions be damned :)

I guess we are clear now about you feel about hacking and stealing copyrighted material.

Your world must be a very interesting place.

I see ... an admission of criminality ... hijacking/hacking into WHITE HOUSE email accounts. On that score, I prefer to remain ignorant.

Wastebasket? We are not all 'fingers-up-our-throats.'

As you know, I do carry out my threats. I'll be good and ready for you soon.
Empty? This from the person who was subjected to companies opening threads on this forum and washing thir hands clean of someone like; this from the person who had a site devote a page to disavowing you?

How about you tell all students here how you resell their pspers on ACAdemon; a reputable SNR company which you falsely claimed to be working for as a writer when you were just one of their resellers.

Hint as to one of your slip-ups: advertising your ACAdemon reseller account so students may buy your pre-written papers - papers which you had custom-written for other students/companies and was paid for them. Translation: they were not yours to sell.

6 companies publicly blasted you.

Did yu ever bother to take a good look around about what other sites have had to say about you, Ever took a look at what other have had to say about you, including your former beloved AR. You really came after us when we told you they weren't above board.

As usual, however, you were your usual rude, defensive self. They had some very very unflattering things to say about you - all recorded :)

WB KNOWS WHO YOU ARE. If it makes you feel any better to deny it and, in do doing, fool yourself, that's your call.

I know who you are and so do a few others. You made a few slip-ups. But, your name will not be publicly revealed right now. In time ... in time.

Failed - you'll see soon enough. Give it 2-3 weeks :)

Proof?

How many writers were publicly blasted and disowned by companies? Just one.
How many writers had a site devote a page to discrediting a writer? Just one.

Guess who? Why you, of course. Remember how you hid after that and then came back as Editor? You were outed as Rusty by WB from your very first post.

You don't know it but I, and some others, know you'll go back into hiding soon :) I think you know why.

Good going, JM! Unfortunately, they tend to dismiss posts such as yours as racist ... they've even deluded themselves into believing that native writers are envious of their success. Almost makes one feel sorry for them.

Major, how did they get away with the .gov or even register the extension? Industry players are getting much too inventive, deceitful and lawless. They should be hanged, drawn and quartered.

I apologise for misunderstanding. Truly do.

To clarify - I said that your lack of commercial interest renders your assessments more objective than those made by the rest of us. How does that fit in with your response about your 'outing' me or 'making false claims about your associations'?

That's just my interpretation and not a factual assertion. I assume that if one does not have a commercial interest in a particular industry, they would tend towards greater objectivity than those of us who do.

Want I meant is that WB's criticisms of other sites are not driven by potential monetary gain - wanting the customers for her site or for herself as clients. For example, she's attacked All Answers Ltd on numerous occasions but defended them (even if they weren't around) when they were, obviously, being unfairly accused of having done x, y or z. Another example: a few years back, she really went after academia-research. I was working with them, thought they were good, and entered into a huge argument with her. Not a few months went by and she was proven right and I wrong.

I guess what I am trying to say is that a lack of commercial interest goes a long way towards allowing people to assess companies in a more objective manner.

At the same time, when a company is secure, well-established and does not need to slam others just to gain a couple of clients, it can be an objective and fair industry player, as is the company which owns this forum.

WB is a valued industry observer and her posts are well-worth reading. As she has said, on multiple occasions, she does not write academic papers. Hence, her objectivity.

As for me - well, a few disgruntled writers have called me a scammer :) whether or not that is true, we are not allowed to recommend our services here or via the private messaging system. Steer clear of any who violate this rule as it simply means that they are desperate for clients. This group (majority of forum members) claim that they are very busy and booked for weeks ahead yet, seem to find the time to trawl for clients here :)

Queen Sheeba of the multiple usernames (I think we've exceeded the 20 username mark now), please feel free to attack me. Don't be dissapointed, though, when I don't respond.

Ricky - all I can say is be very very careful. If you are dogging to deal with a private writer, do not pay until they deliver. They can withhold the bibliography list and once you fully check the work, pay and get your bib page(s).

If you are going with a company, place a very very small test order first - your intro, for example. Then continue along that vein until you are absolutely sure that the company is above board.

Having said that, I'd like to assure you that many companies and writers are damn good.

You are sounding more and more deranged by the minute. Are you off your meds?

You are getting to be extremely tedious and terribly boring, so I won't play along and respond to you until the fancy hits me :)

From someone (look through your different usernames' post) who knows, full-well that WB and I had serious disagreements in the past, this

Classy response but, as usual, minus any supporting evidence.

WB always supports her claims. Read and learn ...

Alive and kicking.

Thanks for your interest in the welfare of our chain of sites. We are doing very well but are operating under a different name following several hacking attempts. However, if you search closely enough, you'll find us and, more to the point, you'll see that we clearly state: FORMERLY KNOWN AS OXBRIDGE RESEARCHERS and list the previous name of all our sites. We believe in a stupid little thing called TRANSPARENCY - look it up in the dictionary.

By the way, you are right in my being in Cairo at the moment. I flew in after a two year absence, only to get trapped in this mess. But, I wish to reassure you that I am quite safe and you needed worry about me.

I find it rather telling that you chose QUEEN OF SHEEBA as your handle. The Queen of Sabaa (Yemen) was nothing short of a prostitute. Brush up on your history or, maybe, you already knew that and are declaring yourself the forum prostitute?

Just so you know, I won't be responding to any of your replies. Acknowledging you is beneath anyone here.

I do :(

Thanks for the info.

You think group therapy is in order here?

Lavender - you've listed yourself as a writer. May I be so bold to ask whether you write for students, etc.? If not, what type of writer are you and what are you doing on this forum?

Pity - if WB had been here she'd have put you in your place, after tearing you from limb to limb for your inane advice.

It certainly is FR ...
Fastcustomessays is part of the academia-research/masterpapers' sites, isn't it? Or is it EW?

Thank you for the lesson.

What does plageurism mean? For that matter, what does your post mean? I realise it is an ad of some sort, possible for p**is enlargement? It is certainly not an ad for an academic writing website!

Meo, yours is the only gibberish one can detect here. Reality check: you are simply not qualified to write in English. As for th's comments, there's this little thing called FREEDOM OF SPEECH. As Churchill once told a member of the opposing Labour Party, (paraphrase), "I may disagree with every syllable uttered by my respected colleague but as this is a democracy, I will defend, to death, his right to stupidity and ignorance." he might as well have been talking of you Meo.

I was commenting on nationality and not on your experience with the site. If you recall, I told you that it must have been horrid.

Wrong - WB is American.
BTW - a few Ukranian sites are good and do not lie about country of origin.

Foromregular - I like you :) say it as it is!

Th - how would a 4 day old member know of your earlier complaints? I think that settles the question of identity, don't you?

Meo - FW went crying to the mods and they asked me not to post it here.
What do you mean I came back after the dust settled. Some of us have work to do and are sometimes absent for long periods of time. Last year, Felix was absent for an entire year. So, please, don't jump to erroneous conclusions. You haven't been here long enough to know the ins and outs of the forum. Besides, as per the mods' request, we are taking our dispute elsewhere as in, not on essayscam. So get to know the facts before slinging mud.

Besides, if you really read the posts, you would have come across FW's admission that he was paid more than he was owed. We docked his end of year bonus for reasons he knows and which I won't reveal here.

Against forum rules but I have no probs with your writing to the mods and their telling you. Our sites are now offline because we are redesigning, expanding the range of our activities and culling the bad writers. We have a one mistake and your out policy - of course, that means we've a hell of a lot of enemies :)

Never a truer word but it is difficult to implement, almost impossible :(

Freelanceliar, aka, Charles, don't push it.

Mods - one more attack from him and I'll do what I said I will. The info and all.

Besides, the loon is only here to market himself. Mods, I thought that was against your policy.

As I said, fo know the name but none of your beeswax. Why, simply because I do not trust loons like you and time proved me right.