Bloody hell. Do stu4, cybermediaboy and dearbpk all work for customwritings.com or something?

For once, I have to agree with WB. Seems like you 3 are clutching at straws right now.

oooh sounding more and more like WB everyday ss.

Yeah i'm sure you're going to get responses by the truckloads!!

Besides, what is the point of this?

seconded

I'm sure all your papers are CRAP. Do the world a favour. Never write for anyone again.

maybe you should do your own work next time you lazy git

struggling it's obvious that michael32 is probably is aka muntazir and thus trying to gloss over his crap work. Quite laughable that a writer will justify his poor work by claiming another person was the author.

I think you're the one in desperate need of reading lessons. Read my question carefully again. I did not ask whether you got a response.

You stupid fool. That was a relevant point. Just because you do not have a valid justification for your earlier post you try your hardest to twist the story. You really are a fool.

Surely Legitimate Dissertation will breach the US version of a Data Protection Act by disclosing any sort of info regarding moneeb's transaction with them to you (someone allegedly not affiliated with Legitimate Dissertations), no?

SIMPLE QUESTION. NEEDS A SIMPLE YES OR NO ANSWER.

That's what you said WB. So I can totally understand how stu4 arrived at the conclusion.
Surely Legitimate Dissertations will breach the US version of a Data Protection Act by disclosing any sort of info regarding moneeb's transaction with them to you (someone allegedly not affiliated with Legitimate Dissertations), no?

Or am I missing something here?

To be fair, ss did not challenge statements you MADE. She challenged the fact that you DID NOT make statements regarding companies bar Legitimate Dissertations.

Why do you always try and twist what others post to suit your stubborn needs?

You know full well i cant quote the post as the thread has been DELETED

It was the thread where i made my first post. Forgotten already? Very convenient.

well you were wrong when you accused me...........

Oh come on, lighten up!!! No need for the harsh bold highlighted writing. Oh, and how many times have you accused other members of being ESL writers? 15...16...36 times?


And where did I admit a violation??? This is a false accusation. You know its against the rules, dont you?

It's cos she works for Legitimate Dissertations. It's Essayscams's worst kept secret for crying out loud. (oops. I guess this post will be deleted soon)

How will you achieve that?

Fair point. To be fair I didnt even bother reading past the first few words.


Didn't realise SS was a 'he'. His/her posts seem rather girly. No offense.

I assume you speak of America-haters who write for US companies, no?
I am not a writer. Plus dont actually hate the country.

...but yet you do feel like trolling through her post and actually counting every word. lol somebody is bored during the dry season me thinks

WB, i think Frosticles refers the US as 'you'.
Just my opinion. Not planning on starting a pro/con US argument

[quote=WritersBeware]Moderator, need I elaborate on why propel's baseless posts--and this entire thread--should be deleted?[/quote]

Oh please. Moderator please let WB take control of this site. She clearly needs to have some sort of power trip to fulfil her essay-writing life lol.

To be fair, I think sarcasm was clearly obvious from WBs pov.

YAWN...YAWn...YAwn...Yawn...yawn...ZZZ...ZZz...zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Classic ss. You gotta love her.

You haven't seen anyting yet. Youtube a show called Bottom. Pure comedy genius. Eat your heart out Friends and Seinfeld.

No please continue. A bit of light-hearted banter is always good especially when Frostat and Serene come across as so mind numbingly stupid.

Lavinia the more you post the more I find you actually quite funny.

Gotta say frostat and serene are like two peas in a pod.
Pathetic ESL members no doubt.

Well seeing as how SS's intentions are pretty much public property now, I wouldn't be surprised if the companies' PR folk who lurk this site (PeterParker et al) strongly suggest to their respective company's recruitment team not to hire anyone potentially ESL. SS unfortunatley your tests will probably be flawed. It's a shame as i'm sure nearly all would have accepted cheap ESL labour.

No doubt WB has already warned her boss at ********* against hiring anyone fishy (joke!)

I beleive what ss is trying to do is a form of quota sampling where she non-randomly selects a variety of companies (ie ones known to employ ESL and ones less so) and bases a conclusion upon her findings. The advantage is this is the quickest and easiest way to gain a plausible insight. Obviously no one can prove beyond doubt that ALL sites employ ESL writers regardless of the number of tests.

That's not the thread Lavinia.

The entire thread was removed. I wonder why...

If you say so.

There's no such thing as freedom of speech unless your name is WB of course.

If the writer has a firm grasp of the topic then research Is NOT as important than if the writer has No prior knowledge.

What's funny serene? Research skills are obviously less important if the writer already has a firm grasp of the topic. Totally agree with Lavinia.

A little consistency is all that's required.

Besided, my beef is mostly with the fact an entire thread got removed for reasons unknown.

Yes but why is it when theusstudent's post included ****** did you not resond with your customary "you may NOT ask for recommendations here"?

SIMPLE QUESTION:

WB can you justify not telling theusstudent that recommendations are not allowed on this site? Especially after there have been numerous occasions where you have stated "you may NOT ask for recommendations here"?

ss there must be a causal link here. I feel the formula is criticise + ****** = whole thread removed.

Do you think WB works for ******? Who knows, WB may even own ******? This essayscam site may belong to ******?

Probably just my own conspiracy theories.


I sincerely wish that thread can go up once more so everyone can see how you lie through your teeth. How can you say WRONG? What have I said which is incorrect?

WB can you justify not telling theusstudent that recommendations are not allowed on this site? Especially after there have been numerous occasions where you have stated "you may NOT ask for recommendations here"?

What on earth did i post which was unproven. After 'theusstudent' asked for a recommendation and slated ******, you did not say your usual "recommendations are NOT allowed". Instead you told theusstudent to read through the thread again to highlight ****** should not have been crticised. Thats what you did. FACT.

Fair enough previous threads where i may have gone OTT were rightfully removed. However there was no way in hell that ****** thread should have been removed. I'm quite shocked that it has.

I've a feeling WB tells the moderator which threads should be deleted and the moderator duly obliges.