EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Forum / Writing Careers   % width   340 posts

Stop Writing for essaywriters.net



rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 21, 2007 | #121
You keep calling me "Amy" to make it seem that only one person disagrees with you.

Because to date, you have acted exactly as her in the manner you argue your point and the trickory you try to employ to discredit me... the only thing that is missing, and at times this makes me think you are someone else, are the lack of racist, hateful and mean-spirited comments she'd make. You need to understand that I am an unbiased person as far as any of these companies go... I'm only seeking and exposing the truth when false or misleading statements are made. As for arguing so much with you and her... well, you're a writer... have you ever backed down from a war of words with anyone before? Believe me, it isn't personal... I truly have nothing against you, just your actions in that one post... You had another reply in a post today that I completely agreed with. If it makes you feel better I'll post my agreement with you but I didn't see the need, you don't strike me as a person with confidence issues.

If you're not her, great. My only issue with you is the way and manner you posted that allegation against that one site. You seem intelligent which suggests you know the source of that information is less than credible and yet you posted the information in a manner that implied "this is real and true"... I'm not saying it is true and I'm not saying it isn't true... all I'm saying is to either post it as rumor or post it with FACTS that support the claim and a discussion board from another site isn't proof. A more responsible way to have titled that post would've been to say "I found this on (whatever site it was), they claim so and so does this". That way you are in no way coming across as trying to present something factual.

** to all: please forgive my redundancy issues today... I'm working on a treatment while I'm trying to debate this with WritersBeware and my thoughts aren't completely on topic which is why from time to time I tend to repeat topic points in the same post.
Dylan  - | 125  
Apr 21, 2007 | #122
You keep calling me "Amy" to make it seem that only one person disagrees with you.

I wondered if you were one and the same person too. Simply because you arrived as she vanished and you seem awfully keen to defend her - posting 27 times in only two days of being a member.

I hope that you aren't the same person. I was hoping that the forum might become more a more civilized place for discussion :)
WritersBeware  
Apr 21, 2007 | #123
YOu think 27 posts in 2 days is a lot? I;ve posted hundreds of times in a single day in other places. That's enough to accuse me of being someone else?
Dylan  - | 125  
Apr 21, 2007 | #124
I said "I wondered if you were one and the same person too". Where is my accusation?

Without wishing to be unduly personal, you do appear more than a little paranoid in this thread.
WritersBeware  
Apr 21, 2007 | #125
I;m paranoid because I'm defending myself against false assertions about my personali identity? OK...
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 21, 2007 | #126
I've already brought one of you down... I'll have no compunction with doing the same to you... You have no idea the resources I have....

You've made a mega major slip....

The average reader can now categorically see that you are a well-funded arm of a demolition scheme out to aggressively carry out a counter-propaganda to all the damages wrought by the successive and protracted complaints by essayscam forum posters against the writing site(s) of your financier(s).
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 21, 2007 | #127
LOL. You would think that. Why? You are paranoid! Are you one of the ones that are targeted or will be targeted? Why do you care? If you're nobody in the scheme of things you would think that you would want these "scam-prevention" sites to be fair and balanced so that members could trust the content. Why wouldn't you want it that way? Would that make it harder to bash legal competition? Why are you so concerned with what I'm doing or who I'm doing it for, if I'm doing it for someone at all... content never lies...

I have said both good and bad about essaywriters.net - True.
I have investigated claims by members that above company was a sham -True.
I have concluded through evidence that they are not a sham - True.
I have also said that I don't like the way they do business - True.
I have also said that my feelings have no bearing on whether they're legal or not - True.

How, in any way, shape or form have I championed the cause for my "financier (s)". If I were as you claim wouldn't I have better access to information to assist me in defending them? Would all of my claims not be positive toward them? WOULDN'T I HAVE ALSO LOOKED INTO OTHER COMPANIES RELATED TO essaywriters.net SO I COULD "CLEAR" THEM TOO? You make no sense with your claims... again, taking something out of context to help mislead the reader into thinking you are right and I am wrong... and you wonder why some of us think you are Amy!

I asked a simple thing of you; post opinion as opinion, facts as facts and rumors as rumors. A person with no vested interest would've said "oh, I understand how what I posted could be misread, I'll do better next time..." and moved on. Instead you keep arguing with me. Amy lost the last one and odds are you'll lose this one too... it's just a matter of time... and every post you make that comes at me from a different angle makes me look more right about you and your motives than what they make me look wrong... because my subject matter and theme have been the same and straight forward all along. A "mega major slip"? I think not... but you're free to twist it any way you need to... I'll be sure to correct you every time you step out of line with my quotes.

Oh, sorry essayer, I didn't look at the name of who posted that... uh.. all those "you's" were directed at you... pardon my brain-fart.
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 21, 2007 | #128
its funny how beth disappears from this site after people REALLY start complaining..

i miss beth. well at least, she's who she says she is.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 21, 2007 | #129
Oh, sorry essayer, I didn't look at the name of who posted that... uh.. all those "you's" were directed at you... pardon my brain-fart.

Yeah... uh, I can write... duh. um... please toss in "weren't" in place of "were".... now if you'll excuse me I've got something to write on the chalkboard 500 times.

i miss beth. well at least, she's who she says she is.

Yeah, I was surprised she didn't jump in more often last week. BETH, WHERE ARE YOU?
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 21, 2007 | #130
QWS, it's been two days. what's the status there with you? as for me, no payment transfer made yet.
WritersBeware  
Apr 21, 2007 | #131
If essaywriters.net[DND*] is consistently paying you late or not at all, report them to the US Department of Labor compliance center at dol.gov/cgi-bin/compliance_contactus.asp. Let the USDOL take care of them.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 21, 2007 | #132
That is an excellent piece of advice WB! I sincerly mean that. All who felt they have been taken advantage of or "scammed" should do this... that's what their there for and the legit way to handle it... they have data bases you can search too if you have questions about companies... the more complaints, the larger the list.

You can also file a complaint against any company that you feel has wronged you in the state that the company holds its LLC or other corporate fillings in. It will take a little work hunting down which state they are filed in but when you do, a good place to start is with that state's State Department... they'll point you in the right direction... There's also the BBB (Better Business Bureau) if you're a consumer. I know the nature of your dealings with these companies is moraly questionable and against the rules of universities but you should be able to word your complaint without stating that you were buying essay papers.
workfromhomemom  - | 22  
Apr 22, 2007 | #133
Make sure you guys make copies of all your correspondences with them.

Correspondences with support reps have been deleted in my account too, probably to prevent us writers from using these against EssayWriters in the future. They deleted all of their posts including those of the customers' in the messaging system and all that was left were my messages in triplicates! This action makes them all the more a very suspicious entity described in essayscam and essayfraud.

they canceled my account because I was not "loyal" to them

If you are wondering whether or not essaywriters.net monitors this site, you bet they do.

So someone here is trying to figure out who among essaywriters' writers are posting on these boards, complaining, and exposing their annoying business practices and thus causing them really bad publicity... how else could they tell who QWS and essayer were and dub them "disloyal" without getting them into a trap to get their identities?

Hey Beth, how about shedding light on this issue?
QWS  - | 4  
Apr 22, 2007 | #134
I, too, am objective. I did get the bulk of my earnings the day after I was terminated. There is only a small balance to be transferred on Tuesday. If I don't receive it, I will forge ahead with the suit. If I do receive it, I won't be able to. The funny thing is, it would have been easier for them to pay me correctly the first two times. I didn't use any kind of nickname when posting because I wasn't hiding anything. What I wrote was true. They didn't pay me at all during my first earnings period, and they did not pay me correctly during the second earnings period. I don't care about the termination because I had been burned twice, and I wasn't about to write another word for them. Believe me, Beth did not disappear. Someone is still monitoring this site. If you plan to continue with essaywriters.net, be careful not to give away info that might identify you. As for me, well, I have two more class periods, then I graduate. My husband and I decided we will still take that vacation, but we'll use a little from our savings. This experience with essaywriters.net was definitely not worth the trouble.

I don't know how hard they are working to identify the writers, but it would have taken little more than a third grade education to identify me. I identifed Margie as the rep who was "trying to help me." One call to Margie about a whiner whose name started with the letter Q, and that's that. As well, the e-mail address I gave you guys to contact me is the same e-mail address the company uses to contact me. As I said, I hadn't written for them since I suspected I wouldn't be fairly paid, and I wouldn't have ever written for them again, so my termination was laughable. The point is that there was no need to disguise myself, so i didn't. As for rat289, my university has a policy against buying papers, and I have never done that. It is not illegal, however, for me to assist in writing papers for other people, edit, or write for companies. For example, I wrote a paper about improving the first aid plan for a city. I have a bachelor's degree in English, and more that a decade of experience in medicine. I was highly qualified to write the paper. The city official was very pleased with it. There was nothing illegal, or immoral, about it.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #135
As for rat289, my university has a policy against buying papers, and I have never done that.

This isn't meant to be mean or anything QWS but... you ever have one of those pet-peeve things... every time you see it you go nutty? Just drives you up a tree? I'm sure I have a thing or two that bugs you... but after reading your reply I noticed something...

"It is not illegal, however, for me to assist in writing papers for other people, edit, or write for companies."

Should be:

"It is not illegal; however, for me to assist in writing papers for other people, edit, or write for companies."

I'm sorry... it just drives me crazy... please don't take offense.

If I understand you correctly the paper you wrote was for someone not attending school. You're right; there wouldn't be anything wrong with that.
WritersBeware  
Apr 22, 2007 | #136
Should be:"It is not illegal; however, for me to assist in writing papers for other people, edit, or write for companies."

QWS' version is the correct one. There are no independent clauses involved. There's only one thought. It's the same scenario if she were to write, "However, it is not illegal for me to assist in writing papers for other people, edit, or write for companies."
Beth  - | 4  
Apr 22, 2007 | #137
Dear Writers!

This is Beth again, an HR representative from the essaywriters.net Team.

I was carefully following your comments regarding our company's work. I was also helping those writers who turned to me directly with their inquiries. I was doing my best to resolve the conflict of interests between some writers and the essaywriters.net Team.

And still I can see that some writers continue to post their negative comments on this forum even after their cases were individually investigated and their particular issues were successfully resolved. These writers seem to feel comfortable speaking out negatively about the essaywriters.net Team and at the same time working for the Company. The essaywriters.net however does not force any writer to cooperate with the Company. Every single writer enjoys the freedom of a flexible schedule and a personal choice to work or quit the Company.

We, the essaywriters.net Team, have recently put a lot of effort into significantly improving the system of cooperation with writers. First, we have offered our writers to speak their minds in the survey. The results of this survey were promptly analyzed. New staff was welcome to work out a new cooperation policy with our writers. As a result, we have updated our System and Writing Guide to assist our new and present writers with their writing, researching and time managing. We have introduced many new options in the system of taking projects and now it is the most efficient system online, and our writers can choose quickly what they like best. We have created a new system of professional upgrade and financial recognition through bonuses. We have improved the free access to paid libraries online to help our writers with effective topical research. Our instant messaging system is also improved, and every writer is treated individually. All the disputable cases, especially regarding salary, quality and plagiarism issues, are considered individually. Seems like this is not considered by the writers posting here, though it was made for their convenience.

I really wish that our most prominent and loyal writers also have find in their busy writing schedules to visit this forum and prove my words. Recently, we have received thank-you messages from our writers, who appreciate both system and communication improvements in the Company.

I also provided my contact information. Every writer is welcome to address me directly with his/her issue. I promise that we will take an individual approach to everyone.

We have also worked out our Terms and Conditions for every new writer who registers with us. We have done so to avoid possible future misunderstanding. We seek transparent and direct communication with our writers. In these Terms and Conditions we preserve the right to terminate the cooperation with the writer who is no longer eligible or who frequently violates the Company's quality policy.

This forum can be really a nice place for communication among writers, who come here to share their experiences, writing tips, etc. To our great disappointment some writers use this forum to compromise the reputation of our Company. We welcome these writers to speak to us directly.

We are hopeful that the writers who post their defamatory comments here do not cooperate with the Company at the moment. Believe me it is really very unpleasant to realize that some of these writers can be working with us and speaking nasty things about us behind our backs.

We are always striving to take a fair side in any conflict between the customer and the writer, as well as between the writer and the Company. We are ready to guide our writers, to help those writers who are less experienced to grow with the Company.

We have no intention to delete your correspondence or any other signs of your activity in the system. Please write me an e-mail, give me the order numbers where the correspondence was "hidden" from you and we'll investigate the case.

We are living in the world where everybody can speak his/her mind.
I have spoken mine on behalf of the Company.
I wish professional success and creative inspiration to every writer who worked, works, and will work with us. It is really a pleasure to cooperate with each of you on the global fast-pacing level.

My best regards,
Beth
bethhalf@gmail
Essay Writers
Dylan  - | 125  
Apr 22, 2007 | #138
I agree with WB. The original version is correct.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #139
QWS' version is the correct one.

Really? I was always taught that "however" must always be preceded by a semicolon and followed by a comma. Oh well, I suppose perfect people like me make mistakes too... hehehehehe
Dylan  - | 125  
Apr 22, 2007 | #140
When "however" is used as a conjunctive adverb, and it appears exactly at that point where two independent clauses come together (or are separated, depending on your point of view), it will invariably be accompanied by a semicolon. There are many other occasions, however, (and this is a good case in point) where this is not true, where the word "however" is a parenthetical element in the middle of a clause and does not deserve or want a semicolon.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #141
Thanks Dylan. Like I said, I remember from school the teacher saying that but then again when I was in school "aint" wasn't a word yet... my recall could be flawed... I stand corrected.
lex  2 | 31  
Apr 22, 2007 | #142
this is not a grammar class.. we are supposed to catch essay scammers here..
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #143
Well you can't catch'em without good grammar! Didn't you know that?
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 22, 2007 | #144
And still I can see that some writers continue to post their negative comments on this forum even after their cases were individually investigated and their particular issues were successfully resolved.

i don't know about the "successfully resolved" thing there because up until my "account termination" you have yet to make the transfer for my last earnings due over a month ago.

anyway, let me just kindly remind you of your communication (Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:35:14 +0300) re my "account termination":

You will receive all of your dues in next three days the latest, regardless the payroll date.

Best regards,

EssayWriters.net HR Dept

today is the 3rd day since and i'm still waiting....

I wish professional success and creative inspiration to every writer who worked, works, and will work with us.

thank you,

and i'll wait for the transfer till today....
WritersBeware  
Apr 22, 2007 | #145
-duplicate post to delete

this is not a grammar class.. we are supposed to catch essay scammers here..

Maybe if writers used sound grammer in all of the papers that they write, essaywriters.net would have one less reason or excuse to deny payment.
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #146
ARE YOU CALLING MY GRAMMAR BAD!!!!!! hehehehehe
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 22, 2007 | #147
why? are you one of essaywriters.net's writers????????????

didn't you repeatedly and vehemently deny having any affiliation with that company?
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 22, 2007 | #148
Nope... was just playin around but I should point out that I did apply and was accepted by essaywriters the other week when I started checking them out... or did ya forget that part? But hey... lighten up... have some fun.... it's warm and sunny outside and the birds are chirping... and I'm still stuck behind this computer... grrrrrrrrrrrrr
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 23, 2007 | #149
your latest clincher slip sure is amusing. it really gave me a prolonged good laugh rat.

imagine, through a succession of mega and clincher slips, you gave yourself away. your affiliation with essaywriters.net used to be hypothetical "what if's". now, it's a closer-to-the-truth story of being an essaywriters newbie writer with "no compunction" to bring us down.

Furthermore, I'm confident that the average person can see the attempts to frame me as a company rep are nothing more than last ditch efforts to discredit me and the truth.

your sudden show in this forum has been suspect from the start but now, the average reader knows for certain that your supposed "fair, balanced and truthful" statements emanate from your conviction as an essaywriters.net agent.

of course, that's not the complete picture of your affiliation with my old company. with the "resources" you so loudly boasted of, you cannot just be a newbie writer with essaywriters.

but at least, you admitted to it. you should have really told us so from the start! there is absolutely nothing wrong with being essaywriters.net's rep. we actually welcome you here so you can give the company's side, possibly clear any misunderstanding between writers and the company and most importantly, facilitate the payment of earnings long delayed.

oh rat, i'm finding your presence here incredible but truly amusing. :)
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 23, 2007 | #150
oh rat, i'm finding your presence here incredible but truly amusing. :)

You're really reaching here essayer. The problem with your claims against me is that I have said BOTH good and bad about essaywriters.net. When I came to the site and got into that long debate with Amy I made it clear to all that I had applied and WAS accepted as a contract writer for essaywriters.net. I also stated that I would take a couple of jobs with them and gauge how quickly I got paid. I also said I would report back on my findings. Here are my two posts that support what I just said...

My appearance here is the result of something you should've done before doing any work for them. I came across the site yesterday and applied to it. I received the "approval" email this morning.

I would like to point out where I say I was accepted by them and where I stated I came across the site yesterday. So I have to ask you... at what point and where have I been misleading? The day I joined this site was the day I was accepted by them which happened to be the day AFTER my friend linked me to the site and asked me to check it out. My "checking" them out lead me to here... Do you see how I would join the site just a week or so ago? Before the day I applied to write for essaywriters.net I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THIS SITE OR essaywriters.net.

If you wish to verify this essayer, message me and I will give you my user name and password there... the user name is the same as it is here... the same user name I use everywhere I can... the same user name I've had for over 5 years (not on essaywriters, on the web)... I have nothing to hide... attempt to back up your claims against me... I'm not afraid of the light like most rats are.

That aside, I have to ask you... what would be my motive for hiding the alleged fact that I'm an agent? How have I pitched the site? Have I not done anything but dispel false and misleading information? Have I not said negative things about them? Why would I have to do anything to gain any sort of credibility in this matter when the FACTS I presented support themselves on their own?

As I said, you're really reaching and you seem very determined to soil the facts and arguments I've made... all of my debates were an effort to make this site a fair and balanced forum so that members such as YOU can rely on the information on it... I have to ask you why are you and other likeminded members so against that? To what end are you working toward here? WHAT ARE YOUR MOTIVES FOR PREVENTING SOMETHING THAT COULD HELP YOU IF YOU ARE WHO YOU CLAIM TO BE - JUST A WRITER!

I don't know about anybody else but my theory is... if you're against fair and balanced you must be with a company out to discredit its competitors... it's the only theory that makes sense. Uh... WritersBeware... I draw your attention to the word "theory"... that means opinion based on limited or no evidence, just on action and common sense... sorry, I couldn't resist the shot... don't get upset...

which brings me to my last point... the grammar comments I made were nothing but jokes about a grammar gaff I made by correcting a member about a semicolon... I was incorrect and I was making light of it... Had I known that essayer was so desperate in finding some way to "bring me down" I wouldn't have tried to be funny... Too bad you take your work so seriously that you can't kick back and have some fun once in a while.

Oh and my quoted posts in the above posts are located in this thread around page 4 or so...
nom_de_plume  - | 40  
Apr 23, 2007 | #151
I have been writing for Essaywriters for quite sometime now. When I started writing for the company, I came across this message forum. The messages posted here created fear and agitation. This notwithstanding, I continued writing for the company and followed its policies. I enjoyed writing for the company's clients and tried my very best to understand the writing guide and their system. And with all the trust and good faith, I delivered and complied.

Until one day during the early part of contractual employment, an issue arose due to a miscommunication. It was no one's fault. Ordinarily with me, such a situation would have been met with understanding and patience BUT due to the gnawing fear that build up and was generated because of reading the messages here-of collective outcry of scam and bogus-it pushed me a bit over the edge-and I started doubting. But my doubts did not affect the level of professionalism I have in delivering the pending outputs. After delivering my last output for that time, I took several steps back to embark on my quest for the truth behind these messages.

Long after I found the truth, I can truly say that my opinion now of this company is based on solid facts and experiences. It was a blessing that I decided to stay on and be a part of its continuous growth. There are hundreds of us working as writers for this company. Some of us write, not for a living but for the learning experiences we get from interacting with clients, the company's support staff, and the varied and interesting topics we research and write about.

We are deeply saddened, hurt and some are even enraged by what we read. Maybe a few of us wrote the company requesting it to weed out those who are 'unhappy and disgruntled' and for 'cause' because of constant bickering and never ending dissatisfaction in the posts-some of which are part of the grand conspiracy to pull and drag the company down.

I believe in freedom of speech and of posting your opinions here but I also believe in exercising that freedom with due regard and respect to the rights of others.

It is claimed somewhere in the message thread that essaywriters have hundreds of orders but these are empty and are not actual orders. I would disagree because I clicked on many and found each to be in order. Maybe when you have logged in, the system was down. I experienced both. I logged in and the orders were empty. I logged in after 2 hours, the orders are posted.

The page that appears when one logs on to the website 'account suspended' is a technical failure as I have experienced that in the past. The company has notified the writers in their notices page immediately after- that the system was down a couple of times due to the fact that the company has increased connection 4 times. The explanation to issues raised here is all contained in the notices page in the administrative zone.

The company now has provided an email address of Ms Beth to assure that the sentiments and complaints of writers can be properly and immediately conveyed to management. Personally, I would want to avail of that mode when it becomes necessary rather than bring it elsewhere.

No organization is perfect as there would be mistakes, miscommunication and delays. I would meet those shortcomings with patience, understanding and professionalism. I have seen efforts of the company to improve and better serve not only its clients but the writers as well. The system was upgraded several times, means of effective communication between the writers and the company; the writers and the clients; between the clients and the company have been provided and improved; detailed policies that cover problem areas with clear penalties for every infraction.

My issue on revision has been resolved FAIRLY and QUIETLY using the company's established procedure and so it works.
There are instances when compensation was delayed but this delay was due to banking institutions or intermediaries. As long as the company sends the compensation on the date it is supposed to; based on its written policy; any delay caused which is attributable to these intermediaries should not be blamed on the company. This is based on the sound principle of fairness. The company should have stopped there but I have experienced the efforts to exhaust ways and means to shorten delays not attributable to it and expedite the remittances of compensation.

It is my opinion that the company is under no obligation to respond to the posts here for it has established already a mode for that purpose. It has regularly and faithfully responded to the silent majority (hundreds) of writers' concerns every single day through the established mode and in the same manner it has responded and obliged to a handful of writers who went public in this message forum. The company has exemplified the highest degree of professionalism in reaching out to everyone.

Whatever concerns which a handful of writers may have against the company; these are matters personal to you and the company. There are hundreds of us who silently do our jobs with much content and loyalty. We work for this institution because it has showed integrity and professionalism.

I would no longer visit these pages. I know that this post may fall on some people's sphere of doubts and paranoia. It is your decision to choose to waddle in your own pool of discontent. But always keep in mind that there are hundreds of us who rally behind this company and when the proper time comes and in the proper place if and when it decides to vindicate its rights, you will all read our individual written statements under oath. This message forum is not the appropriate medium for the majority.

I will all leave you with this:
A German philosopher , Georg Hegel once said, "The learner always begins by finding fault, but the scholar sees the positive merit in everything."
WritersBeware  
Apr 23, 2007 | #152
There are so many different things in yoru post that tell me you are a shill for essaywriters. I'm not into long posts, so I'll just mention one. You say that the "account suspended" message is a "technical problem." That's bogus. Isn't that the same untruth that Beth told? That warning only appears when essaywriters.net has violated the TOS of the Web host or failed to make timely payments for hosting. The ony person who would make up bogus excuses for the disciplinary action of the Web host is someone who has a vested interest in keeping essaywriters' infractions quiet.

WritersBeware once said, "The learner always begins by finding obvious fault, but the scholar sees the hidden deception in anything."
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 23, 2007 | #153
WritersBeware once said, "The learner always begins by finding obvious fault, but the scholar sees the hidden deception in anything."

Not to mix it up with you again but you forgot another saying...

The innocent will concede when their facts are proven wrong, but the deceitful will keep arguing with false and twisted evidence.

Some of you guys here just keep arguing by presenting the same evidence that has just been redressed.

However, I do have to agree with you that the post by nom_de_plume does seem a bit fishy. Of course this is OUR (yours and mine) opinion and there is a chance WE (you and I) could be wrong about nom_de_plume. WE say that WritersBeware because we really have no evidence to support our suspicions.
nom_de_plume  - | 40  
Apr 23, 2007 | #154
oh dear me, Hegel must be turning in his grave!

Let us find out what Thomas Jefferson has to say, "Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both."

Goodluck to you, WritersBeware--your name sounds spooky! Boo! Goodbye and enjoy your waddle in your warm pool :-)
WritersBeware  
Apr 23, 2007 | #155
Wasn't it Beth who actually said that she was begging writers to post positive comments here?
rat289  1 | 142  
Apr 23, 2007 | #156
Goodluck to you, WritersBeware--your name sounds spooky! Boo! Goodbye and enjoy your waddle in your warm pool :-)

You see, this is a good example of what the actions of posting false information as fact nets you. nom_de_plume could very well be legit, but because as members we don't hold to a higher standard of proof for the things that are posted here he/she immediately falls under suspicion because nobody knows what to believe. Are you people beginning to see why truth, fairness and balance mean so much to me and to the credibility of this site?

I'm not trying to say holding a higher standard would prevent companies from doing things like this BUT if all that was posted here were real facts, why would they have to? And if they do... Let's say for demonstrative purposes that essaywriters turned out to be a scam, all we'd have to reply to his/her post of blessings would be a very short and direct "We're glad it's working out for you but based on the facts, we believe this company to be a scam". If they insist on arguing with you, all you would need to do is refer them to the threads that contain the proof.

The way things are here at this time, we don't know who to believe... is that why you came here? If so, then you're part of the problem, if not, perhaps it's time to take action and fix it. By demanding that all information about ANY company posted here is true and backed up with evidence when needed or noted as opinion when evidence can't be found, you turn this forum into a powerful tool for those who have questions about a company than the advertising board it currently is for companies looking to sway customers and writers from their competitors.

Wasn't it Beth who actually said that she was begging writers to post positive comments here?

Yes, I believe so, however, I don't believe she meant it in a deceitful way... it's just a feeling I have about here... I could be wrong.
nom_de_plume  - | 40  
Apr 23, 2007 | #157
I will further oblige with a final post WritersBeware:

Wasn't it Beth who actually said that she was begging writers to post positive comments here?

Non sequitur! I am just in a quandary as to why you can't handle truth. One disappears --then one resurfaces on the 19 April? boy, your specie multiplies fast--reminds me of the gremlin movie. You do not even sound like a writer to me.

Since we are on your spooky page: ". . .bigotry and prejudice, ghosts though they are, cling tenaciously to life; they are shades armed with tooth and claw. They must be grappled with unceasingly, for it is a fateful part of human destiny that it is condemned to wage perpetual war against ghosts. A shade is not easily taken by the throat and destroyed."

Oh I just love French drama! That is Victor Hugo for you--I am sure with your magnificent brilliance, you would remember that, wouldn't you?

Bonne journée ! And don't try to get up, you look fantastic in that warm pool.
WritersBeware  
Apr 23, 2007 | #158
Please take your nonsense elsewhere.
essayer  - | 118  
Apr 23, 2007 | #159
i agree writers beware. so many infiltrators with loooong convoluted posts here.
workfromhomemom  - | 22  
Apr 23, 2007 | #160
There are hundreds of us working as writers for this company. Some of us write, not for a living but for the learning experiences we get from interacting with clients, the company's support staff, and the varied and interesting topics we research and write about.

How would you know that you hold the same sentiments as your "fellow writers"? How would you know that they too are "deeply saddened, etc." by the posts of individual writers here? Most writers at essaywriters don't know a thing about each other so how can you speak on their behalf -- the "hundreds" of other writers working for the company? I know a three or four others working there -- BUT A HUNDRED?! LOL Unless you're the employer...

Would freelance writers actually go to the extent of asking essaywriters' admin to "weed out unhappy and disgruntled" writers of the company? I still don't think so. Like the opinions of others here,

the post by nom_de_plume does seem a bit fishy

I have seen efforts of the company to improve and better serve not only its clients but the writers as well.

You've seen these changes recently had it not been for the posts here, honey. I think that prior to most of the complaints posted here, essaywriters wasn't doing anything :-)




Forum / Writing Careers / Stop Writing for essaywriters.net