EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Posts by rustyironchains / Posting Activity: ☆☆ 158
I am: Unspecified
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Last Post: Nov 29, 2010
Threads: 12
Posts: 696  
Displayed posts: 612 / page 6 of 16
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
rustyironchains   
Mar 22, 2010

'New network of which to beware'? What a clumsy semi-literate title - it reads rather like a Japanese instruction manual! Better in this context to say: 'New network to beware of'

please do not pretend to be an expert in something on which you have a very tenuous grip, like sanity, or English.

want the rest of the world to be as DUMB and illiterate as you

all things being equal among you ninnies, Modmuff does have a point-- it really should be "new network of which to be aware," or "new network-- beware."
rustyironchains   
Mar 20, 2010

most companies exist to act as a middleman between writers and clients, and, as such, will not let you make a deal with the writer directly. I have heard of a few exceptions, but they are rare.
rustyironchains   
Mar 20, 2010
Writing Careers / Writing for Academic Knowledge [160]

wow, Modmuff, you really put the "nation" in "imagination..."

and the "ass" in "assumption!"
rustyironchains   
Mar 20, 2010
Writing Careers / Writing for Academic Knowledge [160]

your bizarre view that people are 'tools'

"tool-" n, colloquial--- in essence, a tool is someone who is owned, and used, regularly.
I should charge you money for expanding your vocab like this, you ******* witless tool. see also: twit, chump.
rustyironchains   
Mar 20, 2010
Writing Careers / Writing for Academic Knowledge [160]

All you do is poke your head in occasionally, take a swipe, and then run away

"why aren't you always under the bridge, waiting, like me?"

You're old and tired

I'm in my early 30s; you?

Believe it or not, not ALL who criticise essay companies are writers of customers or essay site owners.

despite your shrieking volatility and utter absence of manners, I see your point exactly-- not all who criticize companies are writers, customers, or owners. in fact, a lot-- I would guess a fair percentage-- are total poseurs. you know-- disgruntled ex-writers who got fired for various reasons, ex-customers with an axe to grind, former owners... would-bes and has-beens. maybe they quit, or maybe they got fired, but one thing is for sure-- they tend to come off like angry, crazy, asinine tools.
rustyironchains   
Mar 19, 2010
Writing Careers / Writing for Academic Knowledge [160]

I can easily spot rivals posting as disgruntled customers or writers a mile off.

it's like a baited trap. I set them for WB all the time. I'd say something like, "some members of this forum are completely nationalist, and don't say anything constructive," and WB would come in, "how dare you? you coward!" without even having been named.

someone reads a criticism, with no names in it, and if the criticism fits, they get really paranoid and lash out against it-- still without having been named! essentially, they fall into the trap, and out themselves as the target of their own scorn.

wtg, Carly. Modmuff, you are a dupe, a snob, and a total fool. how does it feel to fall into such a simple trap, and still try to pass yourself off as such a cunning font of knowledge? you and your avowed nemesis WB are actually very similar, you know.
rustyironchains   
Mar 17, 2010

Annotated bibliographies should not come for free. they should be extra pages, usu. 3-4 for about 11-15 sources.

the cheapest site I ever worked for was essaywriters.net... not a US site.

Also, stop sending us "grading rubrics,"

I find these useful for making subheadings.

Just use those boxes to tell us that all the necessary information will be sent as a file later.

these are the worst.

also, attn. company administrators--

as you can see above, your customers are 90% idiots-- ignorant, uneducated, inexperienced, nervous...

your writers, if you're in a somewhat legit company, are 90% experienced-- educated, creative, reasonably intelligent...

and yet, 90% of the time, if there is a dispute, there you are, on the side of the moronic customer, defending them to the end, right or wrong...

defending the short money at the expense of the long.

administrators-- in such cases, pray tell, wtf are you thinking?
rustyironchains   
Mar 16, 2010

But ALWAYS a bibliography should come for free and not be part of the word count

unless it's annotated.

Harvard if no other specification is made.

if you're in the UK.

...let's watch out for absolutes.
rustyironchains   
Mar 15, 2010

I've never had a paper returned for a font change, but I believe it's happened. seemingly, there is no end to what these people can't do for themselves. it's enough to make you want to cancel the order and post the paper on the web. if it weren't so snitchy and crybaby, I would do it often.
rustyironchains   
Mar 14, 2010

Now that it is busy-busy, here are some rules some of you "students-clients" in this retarded shadow industry might want to notice, so that we can all save some of our hair.

1. When you request a revision, don't just say "revise it." be detailed. your writer does not have a crystal ball.

Project Revision2. writers aren't going to do your cover-page for you. a cover page consists of your name, your professor's name, the name of the course, the title, and the date, on a blank piece of paper. your writer is not supposed to have this information, anyway... though they might.

3. An annotated bibliography can take 3 or 4 extra pages, on average. when ordering, if you need an annotated bibliography, you need to order extra pages.

4. If the paper doesn't match your specs, change it on your own a little, before you go handing it back for revision. you know, you're not supposed to just hand it in, anyway. often, your professor is going to recognize your "voice"-- or the lack of it.

5. If you are dumb enough to just hand it in (and I know, most of you are), and your professor busts you, don't go crying to your writer, asking them to "change it into my own voice." your writer, and everyone else, is going to be howling with laughter at you at this point, for being such total dumb.

6. Don't be mean, sassy, or aggressive to your writer, even if they are mean and sassy to you. it may be hard to resist, but keep in mind: this is a person who may, depending on the company, have: your phone number, a copy of the paper you are going to try to pass off as your own, your school name, your username and password for your school databases, your name, your address, etc. so, big smiles.

7. Class textbooks are expensive, and nearly impossible to find in your writer's local library. remember, you are not in the same class with your writer. if you have a big, heavy, expensive, obscure class textbook that needs used, you are going to need to scan some pages from it.

8. If your assigned writer emails you a question, don't wait more than 24 hours to answer it. this is not like dropping off laundry. sometimes your writer may have a question, or need clarification on an issue before starting your paper.

That's the tip of the iceberg... thanks for listening.

WB, thanks for being a silent conduit. I was expecting you to wade in, calling me names--what a nice surprise.

right, the reference thing. a lot of customers want 15-25 references crammed into a 3 page paper-- it's ridiculously unrealistic. sometimes I think it's because they don't realize it's a research proposal. a lot of these are UK customers, though-- I think the system is more insane there re: sources. it really steams me when a customer returns an order for revision because it's APA instead of Chicago, or something-- really, you can't change this yourself? when did we learn referencing, junior high?
rustyironchains   
Mar 09, 2010
Writing Careers / Sigma-research.net [13]

"The writers' panel area is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance work due to which you will not be able to access it for the next 6-12 hours. Sorry for the inconvenience."

this has been up for about a week.

the site is showing zero orders.

sketch city.
rustyironchains   
Mar 07, 2010

Spelling Mistakesno one is following you around, egomaniac.

re: writing websites that have spelling mistakes--

sure, it's bad for business. it scares literate customers away, and gives prospective writers pause. but how many customers in this industry are literate? and how many writers care about anything but getting paid? (don't answer, WB-- I'm talking about writers who are actually working in the industry, not lapsed, lazy would-be moralists who used to, maybe).

I work for a couple of sites that have horrible grammar/punctuation/spelling on their sites, and they all seem to be doing OK. in some cases, I think it's that the owners are morons. you don't have to be smart to own a small business-- "I'm a small business owner," in all too many cases, translates into, "I'm dumb as a rock, and unemployable." their giddy pride in having a cash stack makes them think that they should write their own webcopy.

In other cases, I believe that the site's programmers are outsourced from wherev, and don't have authentic native US/UK/OZ English as their top priority. but in any case, I wouldn't go so far as to claim poor website writing as some sort of scam warning-sign-- unless you're paranoid, xenophobic, and/or defending your own interests by attacking others'.
rustyironchains   
Mar 01, 2010
Writing Careers / Sigma-research.net [13]

from the sigma site:

"Our rates are competitive and are in-line with our competitors however; it is our firm belief that hard work shall be rewarded adequately. Our bonus system is unique and offers our writers a great chance to earn highest amount based on the number of positive feedbacks they receive from our customers. We will pay as bonus to our writers the highest amount earned by them in particular month provided they get highest ratings from our customers."

the lack of correct articles; the counting of non-countable nouns; the lack of correct punctuation; the perplexing, and somewhat sinister, use of "however" in the first sentence...

I wouldn't get my hopes up.
rustyironchains   
Mar 01, 2010
Writing Careers / Stop Writing for essaywriters.net [340]

You're a jump-to-conclusions, self-righteous, indignant, don't-know-it-all-but-thinks-she-does accuser

this is really creative. it's a wonder you didn't make it as a writer...
rustyironchains   
Mar 01, 2010
Writing Careers / Stop Writing for essaywriters.net [340]

Sorry, I just noticed a spelling mistake in my previous post

what's that word between "a" and "mistake?"

nice to see the OCD in effect, though.
rustyironchains   
Mar 01, 2010
Writing Careers / Stop Writing for essaywriters.net [340]

If there were only one error in your post

did you check, or just assume? c'mon... where is your OCD? there is only one:

Irf

and it's obviously a typo.
rustyironchains   
Feb 25, 2010

speaking of laywers and agendas, we should be uniting to storm essaywriters.net offices by force. I expect us all to unite in this. WB, you can get behind that and get us spy photos of their houses, too, right? you too, StudentsBeware? you can work on the local arms cache. I have just the idea to ship in at the end, too!
rustyironchains   
Feb 25, 2010

Americans' obsession with lawyers is second only to their obsession with their emotions

I wonder how many Americans you know personally.

I don't consider shouting at someone on the internet to be a personal relationship-- I'm talking about your everyday reality.
rustyironchains   
Feb 15, 2010

you're just digging a deeper hole.

we've already been over the information you stole from me and posted as your own-- it was EW's sudden drop in order prices, about a year and a half ago. and I've already said, it wasn't just me-- it was also EW_Writer. so get off the old news, please.

you didn't know EW's order prices then, and you don't know them now.

that's because you don't have an account there, or at AR.

so, you think a lot of caustic yammering is going to drown that fact out? no chance.
rustyironchains   
Feb 15, 2010

no, I don't think so. even doing something as small as exposing you as a liar with no test accounts, I feel I'm doing something productive here.

I think I'm going to stay here and try to continue to be productive, by posting my experiences as an active writer in this industry.

so, deal with it.
rustyironchains   
Feb 15, 2010

I'm not so into the insults, WB. if you have a mean case of the reds, that's your problem. don't take it out on me.

skimming your reply, I see no orders; just insults. good luck in the future, trying to convince people you know what you're talking about.

"test accounts," my butt.
rustyironchains   
Feb 15, 2010
Writing Careers / Writing for Academic Knowledge [160]

some customers not understanding how they can properly make use of a model answer

wink, wink.
rustyironchains   
Feb 15, 2010

I asked first.

lol. backpedal much?

it's all noise until you post that order, WB.

the question you asked first has already been answered.

here it is again: I say that you're a thief, WB, because you don't seem to have any kind of direct insider experience at these companies. so you take other peoples' comments (only if they are negative) and run with them. you pretend to have their inside experience by simply assimilating the experiences of others, taking them as your own, and posting them as your "personal knowledge" as some kind of industry insider/ watchdog.

now that I've answered your question for a second time, it's time for you to show some of that civilization, and answer mine.

once again, it was: WB, would you do us a favor and post a current order from one of your testing accounts?

no more personal attacks, WB. no more claiming I didn't answer your question. 2 options:

1. put up

2. shut up
rustyironchains   
Feb 14, 2010

I'm not the one bragging about my "testing accounts."

but anyway, in answer to your question, yes, you steal inside information. not just from me; you steal it from anyone who actually works at the places you just capture screenshots of. it seems risky and unreliable to me, especially given your faux-empirical bent. any of these people could be lying, including me...

now, speaking of the truth and lies, how about posting that random order?
rustyironchains   
Feb 14, 2010

Oh, and since you apparently have not noticed, I've been ignoring idiots like you.

till now, right? so, WB, could you do us a favor and log in to one of your accounts and post a random order?

that's what is known as "evidence," btw... it's a word you throw around a lot.

"evidence" isn't

Take a look at the level and breadth of evidence in all of my investigations.

"evidence" is "take a look at this current order I can pull up..."

we'll be waiting.