Hahaha. I think it's well known who this guy actually is. I wonder why this guy isn't tired of creating so many new names. What does s/he actually mean to accomplish?

I think the guy is trying to translate some of his native language expression into English (in the most literal sense). I guess this person EssayHood (who actually is either Heremeout, Muny, and/or Mukherjee) is trying to say the "persuasive argument/talk". Lolz.

I certainly may have looked over the correct use of the two phrases; however, I am always open to criticism and ready to further my understanding of English and other skills.

Thanks for putting your time.


Haha. You know it.


I am not doing so. Secondly, it should not offend anyone in any way because I am just an ESL writer contributing to the countless ongoing themes on this forum. This world is big enough to have people like me. Mutual tolerance is very important.

When I don't want to offend anyone, no one should presumably get offended for nothing. Instead, Rusty, it's going to be a lot more constructive if you could do something useful

I am afraid not. If you click any of these threads, you'll also find that these posts have been marked as spams. Mods of the forum delete them in due course.

Wish you had read something beforehand on the use of a dot and an exclamation.

I wonder you're asking a question that needs measurement of some qualitative variable. You've tried to answer it already. I guess worst is still to come.

It's not very difficult to do so. You can inquire of the per page price from a reputable company to see the standard market p/p compensation.

Usually the most important instructions are given in the document provided by the tutor/lecturer. After that comes the role of "how" the client wishes the writeup to go. Next is the confusions faced by the writer in between the 2 of these things; so a clarification from the writer and your feedback to it makes it very convincing for both the parties. The rest can be covered if the writer shares page by page (or topic) writeup with the client. In my experience, this process leads to a very satisfactory product.

Wish you could also have read a bit on linguistic deviations. Secondly, I have always tried to learn from all the sources from all the people. That is I am at this level.


I have already stated that I don't pay serious attention while posting on this forum; however, I've also said that this is the other way around while I am writing a paper for which I am paid.


I am sorry but you cannot pass this verdict; you don't have the authority, or do you?


You need to understand that also.


Redundant!


Once again, you're issuing verdicts only to assure your (superior) mind that NNS are not equal to a NS. Wish you could have read a bit on 2nd language acquisition (SLA - the term used in the research discourse).

I have many and many a time said that English is my 2nd language; nowhere do I claim to have NS-command. However, every time you communicate with me (and Rusty), you remind me of the same thing. This simply tells me you're not ready to create room for me in the industry. It doesn't really convince you NNSs can also earn money.

In all honesty, I find it quite appropriate to share with you that my NS clients (who clearly know my background) find my work quite promising and they're very happy. I just emailed a paper to one of my recent NS clients, and, you know what, he deposited USD50 as a bonus.

Therefore, I'm in a position to say that my research skills (plus my present language skills) are up to a level where I can earn my livelihood, notwithstanding the fact that I am a NNS.


Here, you needed to be a bit braver than you're trying to be here.
I'd interpret this sentence as:
"Usually I review my posts to remove the slips and errors that may prevail in the first writing so that I can show to people I am perfect". I am sorry but every SINGLE writer in the world leaves errors and slips in their first draft. Would you not agree to it?


You're here to pick up a fight only. You make such posts as can invite opposition, resistance, and rudeness.
You have made very few constructive posts (I am sorry). This fact is as visible to every visitor to this forum as the rising sun.

I am never resistant to correcting my mistakes (not errors); this is what I have always tried to communicate with you and EW.

Now, you should also review your beliefs and knowledge regarding these concepts in SLA (not just in the regular dictionary sense): linguistic deviation, idiolect, SLA, NS model of language, error, mistake, prescriptive vs descriptive use of a language. I'd share some more with you two when you've gone through these. Let me know when you have.

Inasmuch as my affinity with WB and P is concerned; I have already explained it over and over. Wonder what makes you guys repeat the same things over and over?

Can we NOT move forward to contribute something positive to this forum?

Have a look at the traffic analysis reports for each company.

• 
  bestessaysDOTcom
  
• 
  Custom-essay-writing-service.org
  

I don't understand how come your bank plus PayPal didn't find any room to help. The transaction went scamming. Wish you could have googled EA some beforehand. Anyways, you can now show all your cards to the company. Tell them openly you're going to report them to the law enforcement agencies and show them all the proof of your transaction with them. Say to them you will post reviews, complaints, etc.

Then wait some and if no response, you can start an iBattle against them. Think of so many potential customers to be scammed in the future. Perhaps, a little time you spend can benefit many.

I am thinking the EA guys (compulsive criminals) won't give a heed to your warnings. Thus, it'd be useful you start a campaign against them. Send each and every link to them you post to expose their dishonestly.

I am sure it'll work. Give it a try. Don't just sit mourning.

Wow.

Thanks for the advice. Whom is the precious advice for anyway?

glasseater
If a company is legit, it'll sure consider the writing level of your requirement.

Lolz! I am smiling at your pointers. This is very certain from the post these are typos and slips. I don't really care for such slips to happen; they maybe numerous, but here on this forum. When I know I am paid to do some writing, it's my first and foremost job to review the final product carefully to make sure no such errors and/or slips remain.

You know very well MSWord detects them easily. I hope this answers your question.


And here you're simply objecting to a deviation from the linguistic norm you may follow in your sociolinguistic context. I am free to show such deviations, and others like it, because I don't interact only with people from your sociolinguistic context.

This is what also tells others I am a non-native writer; which I already have stated so many times. I hope it makes you happy.


I am sure you were quick enough to arrive at the meaning you implied from my actual sentence. That was perfectly alright.
You need to read my sentence carefully and... cool-mindedly. :)


Yours is certainly the approach known in applied linguistic research as "prescriptive approach". I'd suggest you go and read something on it.

FYI: This approach was abandoned decades ago. You will find my response when you something on PA. Cheers.


I am sure the basic reason that made you go mad aleck at me is NOT the slips my posts show; it's only because you didn't imagine I'd post something regarding my knowledge of SPSS. I wonder if you ever heard Eviews.

So anyone can learn SPSS; ESL writers like me too. Or you think learning it is the right of native speakers ONLY?


You can see - your post is EDITED!!! None of my posts in this thread is edited. I hope you understand what I am trying to convey :-).

Keep searching and you will get some good ones too.

I must tell you that serious members will not help you the way you want. It's not very difficult to find out a few good companies after some research on the forum. Perhaps, you don't want to do that.

It's a very good description indeed. You have explained everything with great simplicity and precision.

Stats and SPSS are not as complex as they seem in the first place.


That was a slip because I was too occupied by my current paper. I don't think other (including you) haven't had such slips.

Hahaha

If you search a bit here on this forum, I am sure you'll get what you're looking for.

This is some valuable discussion, indeed. It's true that many writers (word smart) do not have a flare for statistics and vice versa.
I'd like to add that it solely depends on the research paradigm a study is situated in. Naturalistic research tends to focus on processes; however, the positivistic standpoint looks at stats. These days growing insight into research suggest we look at both processes and stats. This way more and more credibility is being attached to studies that can bring both the elements. At least descriptive stats aligned with qualitative methods.

FYI: I am also quite proficient in SPSS and EViews.

I am just wondering what this thread and your one-liner mean....

Would you mind excusing us from reading your miserable (de)attachment with Aca? See, it's no use carrying on the centuries old rants. I hope you learn some forbearance or else you'd let the general visitor to this forum think you're a victim of self-pity.


Above I (not Pheelyks) asked you to define marketing. However, your knowledge is commendable. Thanks dude. Thanks for increasing our knowledge. But is SEO really marketing? :-p

Once the text data is in, processed, it's stored. However, it depends on the sensitivity of the software application and its access to the archives.

In your case, I don't think your school's plagiarism checker will detect your paper as plagiarized; however, if it does, then it will match your paper with the same copy you submitted to the other scanner.

In this case, you can show the plagiarism report to your tutor with date, time, and summary. I hope it helps.

I have already, many a time, cleared my position but you keep on repeating this point. In fact, I must say you have only two things to say over and over in every single thread and all the posts you make in a thread: (i) You lost your AK acc.; (ii) WB and P are your rivals.

Is that only it? C'mon man, get a life.


Huh...?

You have given me the most precious knowledge!

And, what does marketing mean? Mind elaborating? :-(


Excuse me? The answer to it is: hahaha

Please mind your language. If you cannot argue with clear and meaningful language, you're making no sense to me.

Please note that you're picking up on me without any reasons now. Am I supposed to think that you're cyber-stalking me? I think so. This is not a good idea. Your argument (and rants about your lost account with AK) is between you and WB. Don't pick up on me for nothing.

Secondly, why should I tell you what this concept is about and how that person's use of it is flawed?

The only thing I can tell (so that your little mind can contain it for now) is that SEO stands for search engine optimization.

Next lesson, next week. Don't forget to memorize this lesson.

I wonder if websites can be sent, can they...? Just wonder how it is possible. I think compressed files of websites with weight in bits can be sent. But then I don't think any websites have this little weight these days...!

Why would someone "inbox" you?

You've stated this concept but it sounds technically flawed seen from SEO standpoint. Get some knowledge of how SEO really works before spamming the forum with your nonsense.

I don't really understand your point. You want to quit, stay on, or what? Search this forum for the company you're working for; moreover, google your company a bit to get to the bottom line.

You might find other posts by people stung by this company and the go ahead. However, remember doing a bit of research before doing any business over the www is a wise thing. This is what people here on this forum have been telling people.

As Freelancewriter has stated above, this forum is enriched with loads of information on numerous kinds of scams, legit companies, and countless experiences shared by different customers and writers. However, to reach to the needle, you need to put some efforts.

Thanks for the joke - I really needed a hilarious one.

We'll be waiting (im)patiently!

In fact, what T has stated above doesn't clearly tell us what actually happened except the fact that he (unethically) turned in the same paper which should have been avoided. @Titi - you seemed to have been well informed of the essay writing industry; however, I wonder why you weren't aware of the fact that turning in the same paper is unlawful.

This is another Brownie for your breakfast. It seems that it's not you cannot research anything; it's that you do NOT want to put any efforts. Spare us for any query you're going to make in the future.

There is always a problem with the mindset people carry along with them. This is what you have demonstrated - you have a mindset that's failed you see you're making no sense on this forum. First, your statement above is simply way too overgeneralized. Secondly, You've failed to substantiate anything you posted here with evidence. Finally, you have NOT made even a single post that is aligned with the central theme of this forum.