Not true - the billing company (SWreg) charges $20, irrespective of the sum.

I understand your dilemma but, my point is simple: find another company. You should not passively submit to exploitation and, most definitely, should not be assisting these people in perpetuating their fraud ...

Another thing - why should ANY QUALIFIED WRITER - any educated person - accept the peanuts these people are handing out to their writers? Some orders go for $4 and $5. How is that acceptable? I'm not even going to mention fines ...

Can't even imagine telling our writers that we will deduct the transfer fee from the money they are owed :) Aren't we supposed to cover business expenses?

Their being Ukrainian, Pakistani, etc. is not the problem and never was. The problem is their inherent dishonesty. They lie about:
1) the company's country of origin
2) writers' nationality
3) writers' qualifications
4) number of years in the business
5) having a literate Quality Assurance department
6) checking orders for plagiarism
7) not reselling research

Is any of that either legal or ethical?

Very interesting ...

Learn English pls. I am not an ET advocate and have no ties to the company. ET is my competition, not my company. That does not mean to imply that I would ever attack any legitimate company just because it is competition. I only attack scam sites, such as yours, and illiterate and uneducated writers, such as yourself.

Researcher - you are nothing but a cheap, two-bit, spamming scammer. Your only goal is to make money by ripping students off. Try making an honest living ... an alien concept to you, I'm sure.

I want to be constructive and market my own sites here. Should I pose as a satisfied customer? A curious one looking for reviews? I could always take out a couple of other usernames and respond to the request for reviews ...

Hey ... how about we all do that?

Seriously ...

The problem is online company formations ... Nowadays, anybody can form a company in the UK as long as they've got about £30 to their name. All they need to do is create an account through one of those online formation agencies, pay the fee and, within 24 hours, receive their certificate of incorporation. People who've never been to the UK, have absolutely no ties there and can barely speak the language are, suddenly, the owners of UK limited companies. When you consider that they can get away with not paying taxes, but we can't, that they are not legally accountable for violating SoGA or the Consumer Protection Act (to name but two) but we are, etc ... it is really unfair. I really don't understand the government's attitude towards this ... why are they allowing it to go on?


It's not even that difficult any more ... just go to any online formation agent, pay a bit more, and buy an address in London ... I think London addresses are going to £49.99 at the moment :)

Seriously ... is this either fair or right?

No they won't. They will lie through their teeth!

I'll wave :)

I like it :)

I pass by it on the way to Loughborough :)

A sieve can never be a sponge; you copy but do not learn ...

I said the greater majority of sites (many here know what I mean), not all


No bad experiences ... and, as reviews are not allowed ... no positive ones, either.


Academic integrity and all that.

Infoguy - as this project is important, you have to exercise extreme caution when selecting a company. Furthermore, divide your order up into several smaller ones. Do not just place a 100,000 word order; place small ones and critically assess quality prior to placing the next small order, etc.

Unless they are out to take advantage of you, none here will respond to the following:


If any do, it is in your best interest to ignore them. What you need to know is that many here have a vested interest in promoting certain sites/writers. Generally speaking, the ones who do so are the low-quality writers/site owners. They need to trawl this forum in search of clients as they hardly ever get repeat business or referrals. A great many of them pose as satisfied students/customers. Hence ... it is in your interest to ignore any/all response to your above request.


Unwise.


Supposing that the thesis you receive is, indeed, original and not copy/pasted from all over, you will be safe as far as the originality report is concerned. However, do supervisors simply rely on turnitin reports to determine plagiarism? No. You could get caught during discussions with your supervisor and during your viva (when it becomes evident that you really do not know the study). Another thing to think about - as far as a significant number of sites are concerned, the chances of your receiving 100,000 plagiarism-free words are almost nil.


The writer cannot do that or, at least, should not. You should not be doing that either.

Uxbridge is a real place in Britain :)

BUT ... aren't they supposed to be in London? Long drive from London to Uxbridge :)

Why Saturday? This does not even begin to make sense. Tell them to issue the refund immediately and send you a copy of the refund transaction they subsequently receive from SWreg.


Do not take blackmail lying down. By doing so, you are enabling fraud. Should ANY threaten to report the matter to your university for no other reason than your demanding a refund (owed to you because of shoddy work or non-delivery), simply tell them that you will be reporting them for blackmail:

1) forward the `blackmail' email to their payment processor
2) forward a copy to your local law enforcement
Inform them that you will do so.

Customers:
1) Blackmail is illegal
2) refusal to process of LEGITIMATE REFUND is unethical and illegal

I can't say for sure but, I rather do suspect that they are stored.

How did I miss that one?!

We are witnessing the de-evolution of our species :(

Precisely! You need to cancel all your cards, close your bank account, change your address and, if you really want your money back, change your name and go into a witness protection programme.

For starters, full-stops should be placed at the end of a sentence, never in the middle.


How is this a sentence?


Or this?

Now - to the issue itself.
1) AA made its decision, and as with any company, is at full liberty to accept or reject an application WITHOUT explanations
2) Since AA could not verify your credentials, they acted responsibly when they rejected you
3) As with other companies, they asked you for a test essay and you submitted it. It is part of your application package and does not mean `they took it' are going to `resell it' or that any proof of your ownership of it is required. Obviously, they did not find it acceptable

4) How is AA `abnormal'?

Now - seeing that you are happy that they rejected you, what is the problem?

Does your rejection constitute proof of AA's dishonesty? To the contrary ...

Yes, Turnitin does store a copy in the repository.


That's what they say. The fact is that if you use writecheck and your instructor later scans the same paper through turnitin, it does come up as original. Whether or not the papers are stored or are simply eliminated from the cross-checking, is hard to tell.

The Psycho makes this declaration:


Then goes on to state the following:



Your powers of persuasion are, indeed, amazing. Your arguments are, by all accounts, absolutely unique.

It is difficult for any to counter the remarkable points you've raised :)

He daren't.

Prove us wrong, Kevin, name the sites ... confront us. Are you man enough? I don't believe you are. You are really nothing more than a parasite who preys on innocent students - takes their money and ... well, you know the rest.

Maria - the psychotic scammer's real problem with AA is that they are beating him silly in the UK market.

His problem with WB is simple - he does not want her to reveal the truth about his sites and less than honest operations.


Is this supposed to be a joke? Maria and all students - stay away from these two.

Considering that the owner opted out of being discussed on this forum, the OWNER should not be trying to market his sites through this forum.

Seriously, people, read the psychotic loon's posts and decide whether or not you could actually trust any site he is connected to. BTW - don't just look under Kevin but under all his 14 (banned) usernames.

Kevin - you opened the door here and we can now discuss the sites you have repeatedly recommended. We'll copy you and bend the rules we have, thus far, respected.

Seriously - are you so damn desperate that you need to trawl this forum in search of clients? Pathetic :)

I confine my insults and abuses to you and Researcher. Can't help myself - I'm so envious of the two of you! How can I not envy those who live in their own imaginary worlds? As for the absolutely spotless minds the both of you have ... well, what can I say?! I just turn green :)


So far you have exposed no one and nothing. Why did I ask the mods to ban you? As any mrn knows - it is because you keep recommending your shoddy sites and, in so doing, are attempting to scam students. BTW - this is not a marketing forum ... take the marketing of your sites elsewhere.


As I said ... the boundless joys of living in one's own imaginary world!


It is not libel:
1) it is the truth
2) I can picture you running off to your lawyer, demanding that he sue WRT for insulting MY NAME IS NOW KEVIN :)


I think you already are in tears.

Mods - should we all begin recommending are own sites?! The imbecilic Researcher and the psychotic Kevin have been recommending their own sites for a while now. BAN THEM!

Going against my better judgement here ...
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you have some logical and factual evidence to support your claim. Your posts could, therefore, be of high contributory value. So, please open a new thread and post the evidence which remotely suggests that "American sites are cheats and proven fraudsters."

I'm in a rather expansive mood, so I'll give you another benefit of doubt. You have repeatedly claimed that the exposition of certain sites as fraudulent is motivated by racism. I am assuming that you are aware of the fact that some American sites (less than a handful) were exposed as shoddy, here. That being the case, please explain how and why you arrived at your `racism' conclusion.

Petey ... Petey ... are you in the throes of a psychotic breakdown? Your communication and comprehension skills are getting worse by the minute. You pose as a serious threat to all that is logical and sane. Please seek help before civilisation, as we know it, ends simply because you walk the face of the planet.

Again - seeing that all therapeutic treatment plans have failed, I recommend electrocution as a cure :)

No, Poppy, they won't take money from your bank account. Neither AA nor any entity has the right to withdraw money from your bank account.

Recommending your sites again? You must be terribly desperate ...


Poofster - AA is precisely that - a limited company, owned and operated by Brits. The only reason why you hate them is because they dominate the UK market. Envious little poof of a prat :)

Are you going out of business yet?

too much time on your hands, Poofster? Averaging 25 posts a day :)

Name the companies, please :)

Don't think that because yours are on the Do Not Discuss List you are, in any way, protected.

Were you to run a clean and honest operation, MY NAME IS NOW KEVIN, maybe you wouldn't be so desperate for clients.

Were you to grow a brain, maybe your posts would make a modicum of sense.

Were you to acquire an education, maybe you wouldn't be the laughingstock you currently are.

How many students have you scammed lately? How about writers?

Such as your sites? Customers won't fall for it :)

Everybody - MY NAME IS NOW KEVIN is recommending his sites.

Deny it till you are blue in the face ... we all know.

Now - go back to Whipsnade and consider a career as an Animal Planet reality tv celeb. You will shine :)

Maria,
As WB told you - never ever send a foreign-based site money through WU, MG or wire. Furthermore, when selecting a site, you should always try look for one based in a country which actually protects consumer rights. The problem with many foreign-based sites (and some UK and US ones) is that they are unregistered entities - they are not companies at all. When they send you shoddy/plagiarised work in exchange for your money, you have to go through hoops to get a refund because

1) they are based in countries which do not recognise consumer rights or define them in accordance with international standards
2) you are dealing with an INDIVIDUAL (usually an immature kid who entered the business under the assumption that it is all about getting rich quick) and not a company/trading individual.

Make your selection very carefully and do not accept recommendations from ANYONE. Ignore any who PM you their recommendations (pretending, of course, to be students).

If you knew anything - anything at all - of the English language and had something more than a gnat's brain, you would have understood that:


meant that the company in question is anything but a scam. Actually, the OP's feedback proved me right:


What I did get wrong was the company's affiliation and, upon being corrected, admitted that I was wrong. You see, Poofster, I admit it when I am wrong :)


Exactly :)

In that case, desperation will drive him towards a career as a one-man comedy show (not act, Kevin, but an entire show) :)

my mistake then, thought they were.
Who are they then?

FreelanceWriter - CP is an SNR affiliate. American, through and through. About 10 years in the business. They aren't scammers and, as is clear from the above, the writer responsible for this mess was let go.

Hats off, WB :)

No - not at all. One of the most prominent in the business.

Ultimately, we are all dependant on our writers - whether its xyz.com or abc.com. It happens and what you need to know is that the good companies keep you, the customer appraised of the situation and do their utmost to deliver your work - find a replacement writer, etc. Worst case - they refund you in full. The bad ones just ignore you and your messages are left unanswered. They put you through the wringer before refunding, etc.

Yours is a case of rotten luck - and it could change. So, don't give up.

__________________

Petey the Poof - no, I am not at all affiliated with the company in question. So, keep guessing Poofster :)